mountaineerwv

No, it should be "Mountaineer, you're an idiot".

Do you know how stupid this all sounds? If we won, you do not surrender. You surrender when you lose. A satellite of the US? That is complete lunacy. And you wonder why after 8 years of this stuff we as a nation are so despised. "It if costs 1000 casualties a year, it is worth it." So, who in your family is sacrificing? I want to give Iraq back to the Iraqis and their elected government and get the hell out of a sovereign country. You and IMAWHORE are not worth anymore discussion as you both are complete, raving right-wing nuts.

So, you are saying that we have won in Iraq? So, when can we start to pull the troops out? We will have a military presence in the Middle East for decades? That sure will make the locals love us even more. Who is the enemy? It sure wasn't Iraq. Was it the Sunnis that we are now paying $10 a day? I assumed the enemy was Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. So, why haven't we gone after Al Qaeda and Osama in Afghanistan instead of this misguided war in Iraq?

Mr. Trimdingman, You never answered one of my many questions: "When will we know that we have WON in Iraq? I hear conservatives talk about wining. What does it mean?" For extra credit: "It has now been 5 years. How much longer? 100 years?" And, I want your answer, not one of your conservative brethren.

You're pathetic. Utterly pathetic. I have never read just bloviating BS. Tell me, what book(s) have you written on the subject? My quess - 0, since you have nothing but blathering lunacy. This is why most people would have given up on you a long time ago, but I made the mistake thinking I was debating with someone who had a modicum of knowledge. My mistake.

Yep, I was thinking of you when I used that from the conservative playbook.

So a young man or woman who just sits back and collects their dividends and income from their unearned trust funds should not be taxed? And, if it is, at a lower rate than their gardner, or their chauffeur or their maid or their nanny? Comparing unearned income to gambling winnings is a bit of a stretch don't you think? Just curious, how did you develop these theories? Have you read something? Have you heard somebody? What or who planted these ideas?

Is this fair? I know, pointing out such unfairness is engaging in class warfare. Right?

Links are spin? A link to the GAO is spin? Who knew? Telling us that the links we posted were spin is itself spinning.

So, you think unearned income should either not be taxed or taxed at a lower rate than earned income? Talk about class warfare!!!!!!!

15% tax rate on eligible dividends and capital gains. Top marginal income tax rate: 35% So, a secretary's income is taxed at a higher rate than his/her bosses' unearned income. Sounds fair to me, if you are a conservative!!!!

And how are we going to get out of this hole? By lowering the tax rates? By cutting taxes again for the rich few, hoping it will "trickle down"? Spending cuts? Where? So many questions, so few answers. Or, only hard answers at this point because Bush has only made those choices more painful. I know what supply-siders would say - Lower the taxes and the revenue will just flow like wine.

Like I am WAITING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! for the answer to my question. hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe he

Let's see if I can double up your childish tactics: hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe

So tell us Mr. CON guy, which is higher ----------------> trade deficit, or the budget deficit?