Jump to content

J-150

Member
  • Posts

    5,873
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by J-150

  1. 4 hours ago, T-dubz said:


    I’m guessing it has some sort alternate method of controlling it. A lot of automakers are now using knobs/pads to control the infotainment so they can place the screen higher up so it’s easier to see.

     

    Ford did this with the 2008-11 Focus. The display was up on top if the dash with knobs below.

  2. On 11/18/2019 at 10:19 PM, AGR said:

    On the other hand, Peter Delorenzo has sour grapes:   http://www.autoextremist.com/

    He's an ex-GM executive, and of course the Chevrolet Bolt is bland and boring.

    He is also a hydrogen/fuel cell advocate, and hydrogen lost.

    I don't think Pete said anything that hasn't been said here.

     

    Additionally, I dont think he's being hard on Ford at all. There's a large degree of truth in what he said.

  3. 8 hours ago, akirby said:

    I'm surprised the driving dynamics weren't better in the Explorer.   Is it really not that good or is this more media bias?

     

    In my experience, Kia's have a bouncier rear axle than Fords. The driver feels bumps being absorbed. Rear passengers just feel carsick. But just the rear. Front axles are stiff. Strange way to tune a suspension.

     

    So if that's their definition of a better ride... yeah there's  some bias. 

     

    As far as performance, any Kia 8ve driven has an extremely sensitive throttle. A light touch just launched the vehicle, for a false sense of power. Once you get the pedal down halfway, there is no more. But that's in my experience. I haven't tried a Telluride yet, but I'm sure it follows the same corporate formula.

  4. 12 hours ago, silvrsvt said:

     

    Yes, if your not applying the accelerator-your getting regenerative braking from the motor slowing the car down. 

    Graph showing Typical DC Motor / DC Gearmotor Performance Characteristics (The 108-104 DC Motor)

     

    Going by the graph above, applying less power will make the motor less efficient.  

    100% or nothing. Got it.

     

    But given the level of tech available in the auto industry alone, not including tech available elsewhere, i dont believe for one minute it cant be done.

  5. 3 hours ago, silvrsvt said:

     

    That's because they have transmissions and tuning that can affect them. 

     

    BEVs for the most part are direct drive and don't act like ICE-1 RPM gives you full torque output on a electric motor vs a gas engine

     

    So the throttle is all-go or no-go? That's what you're suggesting. 100% torque all the time. That just isn't true. The throttle can be programmed with limits  such as max 50% torque output in Eco mode.

     

    DC electric subway trains have have adjustable throttles since 19th century. It can be done.

  6. On 10/6/2019 at 1:32 AM, fuzzymoomoo said:

    I believe that eventually we will stop seeing as many performance oriented BEVs and more that are focused on range. Right now with where battery technology is at you can't really have it both ways and there's still a certain stigma among the public that electric cars are slow. So once this slew of performance BEVs have entered the market (notice only GM has an electric car that doesn't tout its performance capabilities at the moment) then we will start seeing the longer range/fast charging models.

     

    I dont see why it can't be both.

     

    Many gasses have the "eco", "normal", and "sport" modes. You can do the same with electric. Eco for range and Sport for increased power output. Normal for a halfway point.

     

    Just like a 3 way light or a dimmer switch.

  7. 8 hours ago, probowler said:

    Yeah, a quick release wire harness/connector for locks/windows seems like a pretty easy solution nowadays.

    Even a quick release door should be doable with the right engineering. I haven't messed with a jeep up close before so I don't know what their design is like.

    The biggest hurdle would be something like airbags, which ford possibly has found a solution for.

    Dont even need wires. A contact on the door and a contact on the door frame

  8. 50 minutes ago, Bob Rosadini said:

    J- you missed my point-I'm saying the driver to do this will be the International dealers-unless you are too young to remember the International Scout-unfortunately I'm not in that boat?

     

    I do remember them. 2 door and pickups are what I remember most. I also remember Jeep Wagoneers. That said, I dont see how Navistar is equipped to sell and service. Their partner GM on the other hand...

  9. 56 minutes ago, Bob Rosadini said:

    As to the "Scout" question, now that Navistar is in bed with GM building GM's class 4,5 and 6 trucks, could be a matter of time before the Navistar dealers say..."hey we want some of that pie-how about a Chevy Blazer (ugh!) we can sell as an International Scout."

    If GM wanted to refresh their plans for a retro off roader, you just nailed it. I think an IH Scout sold through GM dealers would be a hit. More than a retro Blazer/Trailblazer.

     

    Especially since the Hummer brand has been tainted.

  10. 3 hours ago, grbeck said:

    A big change is that for decades GM management would talk tough, and then essentially roll over and give the UAW most of what it wanted (and white-collar employees approved, as that meant more pay and benefits for them, too).

     

    Whatever one can say about Mary Barra, I do not get the impression she is going to follow that playbook. She realizes that it's not 1965 anymore, and GM cannot afford to cave and try to pass along higher costs to customers.

     

    You think this is payback from Barra? A contract she disapproved of was forced on her when she was head of HR. Not shes correcting it.

×
×
  • Create New...