Jump to content

Confused Possible New Fusion Owner


Bruno1453

Recommended Posts

I am looking the the AWD SEL Fusion as a possible new car for my family. I live in Colorado so not only does the altitude take away power, but the AWD system does also. I was really (I mean REALLY) hoping to see the 3.5 liter in the 2008 model, but according to stuff I have read on this site (specifically the ordering guide for the 2008) it will NOT be happening. But I am reading about the "3L PIP", which sounds like the 3.0 liter will be modifided to 240 HP. The ordering guide does not talk about this change. Is this something that has happened for 2008? Should I just get the 2007 AWD SEL? Any idea on the price increases for 2008? My local retailer won't tell me a thing. :censored:

 

Thanks for any help you guys can provide!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am looking the the AWD SEL Fusion as a possible new car for my family. I live in Colorado so not only does the altitude take away power, but the AWD system does also. I was really (I mean REALLY) hoping to see the 3.5 liter in the 2008 model, but according to stuff I have read on this site (specifically the ordering guide for the 2008) it will NOT be happening. But I am reading about the "3L PIP", which sounds like the 3.0 liter will be modifided to 240 HP. The ordering guide does not talk about this change. Is this something that has happened for 2008? Should I just get the 2007 AWD SEL? Any idea on the price increases for 2008? My local retailer won't tell me a thing. :censored:

 

Thanks for any help you guys can provide!

 

Why not jump to the AWD MKZ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the PIP 3.0 is due in the Fusion for '08, and mid-cycle in the '08 Escape also if I recall correctly. It's the turbo 4 cyl that won't show up until '09.

 

Milan is also rumored to be getting the 3.5 for '08, so you may want to look there also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruno

If mileage is important to you, check the numbers. Although I have no first hand knowledge, there are some posts on the forum that lead me to believe the 3.5 AWD gets significantly less MPG than the 3.0 AWD. And the AWD in general seems to be quite a bit more thirsty than the FWD,

Like I said, I dont know first hand, just my impression from reading some of the posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruno

If mileage is important to you, check the numbers. Although I have no first hand knowledge, there are some posts on the forum that lead me to believe the 3.5 AWD gets significantly less MPG than the 3.0 AWD. And the AWD in general seems to be quite a bit more thirsty than the FWD,

Like I said, I dont know first hand, just my impression from reading some of the posts

 

If by significantly you mean 1-2 MPG less, you may be right. It's kind of comparing apples to oranges though. The MKZ is a bit heavier a car than the Fusion due to all the extra goodies and sound deadening. The same powertrain in the Fusion would likely get about the same milage that the 3.0 does. Main difference will probably be the inclination to lay on the "go" pedal a bit more with the 3.5. Weeeeeee!! :happy feet:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not jump to the AWD MKZ?

 

akirby, I can give you a $10,000 answer right there.

 

Bruno -> Prices might actually be in the 2008 Fusion model guide posted by ice-capades. Search for what that user has posted, or maybe someone can put up a link if they remember where it is within this forum.

 

How about an AWD Taurus for consideration?

Edited by Roadrunner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are probably right, I just remember reading that one poster that is getting like 13 MPG in around town driving in his MKZ and I definately couldent handle that.

But, like I said, its all hear-say (is that the right word?)

 

Wow - because I'm getting 22-24 around town. Lighter traffic, yeah, but still pretty good.

 

Right now I'm getting 27.8 mpg(!) because I drive at night and use cruise control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are probably right, I just remember reading that one poster that is getting like 13 MPG in around town driving in his MKZ and I definately couldent handle that.

But, like I said, its all hear-say (is that the right word?)

 

Yeesh, my Cobra doesn't even get fuel economy that bad. :hysterical:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If by significantly you mean 1-2 MPG less, you may be right. It's kind of comparing apples to oranges though. The MKZ is a bit heavier a car than the Fusion due to all the extra goodies and sound deadening. The same powertrain in the Fusion would likely get about the same milage that the 3.0 does. Main difference will probably be the inclination to lay on the "go" pedal a bit more with the 3.5. Weeeeeee!! :happy feet:

 

Wow. Here we go again with the "MKZ gets a little worse milage because it's heavier" argument.

 

B.S.

 

The MKZ is only around 160 lbs. heavier. There is no logical "weight hurts it's MPG" argument. The 3.5L would definitely NOT get the same MPG as the current 3.0 if available in the Fusion. That's ridiculous. If the 3.5L gets 19MPG/City in the MKZ V6 AWD, how on earth can anyone assume it will get any better in a car that's only 160lbs lighter?

 

BTW: No where is the actual curb weight published for the SEL AWD V6 Fusion. Me thinks Ford is scared to admit the obese numbers and how close they are to the $10,000 pricier MKZ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Here we go again with the "MKZ gets a little worse milage because it's heavier" argument.

 

B.S.

 

The MKZ is only around 160 lbs. heavier. There is no logical "weight hurts it's MPG" argument. The 3.5L would definitely NOT get the same MPG as the current 3.0 if available in the Fusion. That's ridiculous. If the 3.5L gets 19MPG/City in the MKZ V6 AWD, how on earth can anyone assume it will get any better in a car that's only 160lbs lighter?

 

BTW: No where is the actual curb weight published for the SEL AWD V6 Fusion. Me thinks Ford is scared to admit the obese numbers and how close they are to the $10,000 pricier MKZ.

 

Did you read to the end of what I wrote? Published numbers are only 1-2 MPG different. I attributed most of the difference in real world to people simply having a heavier foot with the more powerful engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since two people have mentioned the new Taurus (Ford 500), has anyone actually driven one? And is the new Taurus really any different than the Five Hundred?

 

I definatley like the "go" pedal, but I also like a car that can handle the curves. If the Mazdaspeed 6 was slightly bigger in the back seat, that car would be perfect!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

akirby, I can give you a $10,000 answer right there.

 

Bruno -> Prices might actually be in the 2008 Fusion model guide posted by ice-capades. Search for what that user has posted, or maybe someone can put up a link if they remember where it is within this forum.

 

How about an AWD Taurus for consideration?

 

The MKZ is not $10K more expensive than a SEL V6 Fusion. Maybe $5K but you do get more features.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since two people have mentioned the new Taurus (Ford 500), has anyone actually driven one? And is the new Taurus really any different than the Five Hundred?

 

I definatley like the "go" pedal, but I also like a car that can handle the curves. If the Mazdaspeed 6 was slightly bigger in the back seat, that car would be perfect!

 

Apparently the entire front subframe was redesigned for the Taurus and put on isolation bushings. Along with it they more than likely tweaked the suspension settings a bit. Apparently it cut down a lot on NVH. Not really sure of any other major changes (aside from the engine of course).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the entire front subframe was redesigned for the Taurus and put on isolation bushings. Along with it they more than likely tweaked the suspension settings a bit. Apparently it cut down a lot on NVH. Not really sure of any other major changes (aside from the engine of course).

 

Thanks for all the information guys! I just found this site the other day and it has been a great resource!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The MKZ is not $10K more expensive than a SEL V6 Fusion. Maybe $5K but you do get more features.

 

Fusion SEL V6 - $22,735

Lincoln MKZ FWD - $29,950

Difference - $7,215

 

Conclusion: The Fusion SEL V6 is indeed around $10k more expensive than the MKZ.

 

So, what unique "features" do you get for that extra $7,215?

  • 0.5 liters of engine displacement
  • 42 horsepower
  • 44 ft/lbs. of torque
  • THX II stereo
  • Speed-sensitive wipers
  • HID headlamps
  • LED taillamps
  • Keyless entry
  • Garage door opener
  • Two additional cupholders
  • Six additional speakers
  • Traction Control

Hmm... Doesn't really seem like that great of a deal... :reading:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fusion SEL V6 - $22,735

Lincoln MKZ FWD - $29,950

Difference - $7,215

 

Conclusion: The Fusion SEL V6 is indeed around $10k more expensive than the MKZ.

 

So, what unique "features" do you get for that extra $7,215?

  • 0.5 liters of engine displacement
  • 42 horsepower
  • 44 ft/lbs. of torque
  • THX II stereo
  • Speed-sensitive wipers
  • HID headlamps
  • LED taillamps
  • Keyless entry
  • Garage door opener
  • Two additional cupholders
  • Six additional speakers
  • Traction Control

Hmm... Doesn't really seem like that great of a deal... :reading:

 

 

You left out:

  • MKZ interior that puts the Fusion's to absolute frickin' shame
  • Increased sound deadening
  • Longer warranty
  • Lincoln-Mercury dealer service which includes complimentary loaners if needed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You left out:
  • MKZ interior that puts the Fusion's to absolute frickin' shame
  • Increased sound deadening
  • Longer warranty
  • Lincoln-Mercury dealer service which includes complimentary loaners if needed

 

The base SEL v6 Fusion also does not come with:

  • ABS Brakes standard
  • Power Seats with Memory (Standard on MKZ and not available on the Fusion)
  • Dual Zone Climate Control (Standard on MKZ and not available on the Fusion)
  • Genuine Wood (Standard on MKZ and not available on the Fusion)
  • Genuine Wood Accents on steering wheel (Standard on MKZ and not available on the Fusion)
     
  • There's also heated and cooled seats (Optional on MKZ not available on the Fusion)
  • One correction on your list though, the MKZ has optional HID lights not standard.

Edited by shllshck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The base SEL v6 Fusion also does not come with:
  • ABS Brakes standard
  • Power Seats with Memory (Standard on MKZ and not available on the Fusion)
  • Dual Zone Climate Control (Standard on MKZ and not available on the Fusion)
  • Genuine Wood (Standard on MKZ and not available on the Fusion)
  • Genuine Wood Accents on steering wheel (Standard on MKZ and not available on the Fusion)
     
  • There's also heated and cooled seats (Optional on MKZ not available on the Fusion)
  • One correction on your list though, the MKZ has optional HID lights not standard.

 

Exactly - you can't compare a BASE Fusion SEL V6 with a MKZ. Comparably equipped the price difference is closer to $5K. I researched this before I bought my 06 SEL V6 Fusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...