Jump to content

Forbes: 10 Future Clunkers to Avoid


Recommended Posts

That article blew. Here's why:

 

From what I can tell, they are gauging the depreciation value of the vehicles as a harbinger to what goes on the list.

Forbes is throwing the term "clunkers" around because these vehicles also are gas guzzlers.

The fuel cost was another major determinate, which kind of goes hand in hand considering these are fuel-thirsty vehicles.

 

The end result, in reality, is a list that had a very bad headline to get internet play on the Cash for Clunkers program. A disconnected hack job nonetheless. Not all journalists can crank out winners all the time.

 

Note that journalists get judged not by their overall stream of work, but the material the public reads. In this case, though, it appears Hannah Elliott handles automotive content as one of her beats.

More from the author: http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=+site:w...b1c6ebfff7f9103

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...