jpd80 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 (edited) The comments of those that have driven the FPV vehicles suggest that NVH is still an issue, and the Territory is a fair bit heavier than the Mustang (isn't it like 4200lbs or so?)---move that to another platform and you can share a lot between the Falcon & Mustang. The FPVs are unabashed sports vehicles with stiff suspension and strong "engine character". The G6E Turbo is far more refined and more to American's taste in NVH - it's silky smooth and quiet, it's the one Kuzak and Mulally drove and have great affection for. It would pass muster as a US Ford. Whilst the Territory is associate with the E8 Falcon, it is on a different platform E265 where the parts carryover is around 45%, the floor pan and suspension while similar in design are different. I agree with you, a smaller Falcon could share much more with Mustang and perhaps Lincoln. In order to protect product individuality, a base architecture could be developed in common and separate teams used to develop regional cars, that way we would maintain the current vehicles' best traits but now on common architecture. I'm just curious how Ford will find a way through this, I understand that a small market like Australia at barely 2% of Ford's global sales cannot hold sway over major product decisions but where there is a need for a market niche that is being met, I'm sure that everyone from Bill Ford down would bend over backwards to help a small market like Australia, for that we're truly grateful. I hope the guys do tick the RWD box next year as it is a truly unique opportunity to show the world how RWD car can be done without bankrupting the company and adding that well known Ford character. Edited January 12, 2010 by jpd80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherminator98 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 So I go and google that quote to see if there's some expression I haven't heard before... and google's already indexed it from "14 minutes ago". Horse-Mustang Yank Penny-Lincoln Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atvman Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I agree with what is being said here, a midsize Falcon makes a lot more sense for Ford than a fullsize Falcon. Realistically, the Mustang is going to need a new chassis eventually, and I doubt Ford is wanting to go any bigger than the current car. It would make sense for Ford to build the Mustang and Falcon on the same size platform and share parts. Ford could also build a Mercury or Lincoln variant of both the sedan and coupe versions of the platform, which would maximize the volume for profitability. It would also make it possible for the Mustang to make its way down to Australia, I'm sure the Aussies wouldn't mind that. Ford Mustang (Coupe) - 3.7L V6 base, 5.0L V8 GT, 5.0L TT GT500 Ford Falcon (Sedan) - 2.0L EB base, 3.5L EB ST, 5.0L V8 GT Mercury Cougar (Coupe) - 2.0L EB base, 3.5L EB XR6 Lincoln MKR (Coupe and Sedan) - 3.7L base, 3.5L EB optional, 5.0L TT in performance spec. The Ford and Lincoln models could be globally available, while the Merury Cougar would be U.S. only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue II Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 http://brisbanetimes.drive.com.au/motor-ne...00112-m334.html Might as well buy a Camry then... You're absolutely certain? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92merc Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I agree with you, a smaller Falcon could share much more with Mustang and perhaps Lincoln.In order to protect product individuality, a base architecture could be developed in common and separate teams used to develop regional cars, that way we would maintain the current vehicles' best traits but now on common architecture. I just don't see that happening. Not that I disagree with you. It just ain't happening. Look at the Focus. It's a volume model. It could afford some regional changes. But they didn't. Even the door unlocks are on the center stacks ala Europe. So Alan won't be allowing that much of a difference in cars. If it's good for one, it has to be good for all. One Ring to Rule them All... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I agree with what is being said here, a midsize Falcon makes a lot more sense for Ford than a fullsize Falcon. Realistically, the Mustang is going to need a new chassis eventually, and I doubt Ford is wanting to go any bigger than the current car. It would make sense for Ford to build the Mustang and Falcon on the same size platform and share parts. Ford could also build a Mercury or Lincoln variant of both the sedan and coupe versions of the platform, which would maximize the volume for profitability. It would also make it possible for the Mustang to make its way down to Australia, I'm sure the Aussies wouldn't mind that. Ford Aust is really busy this year with the release of the series II FG Falcon by July, the engines have to comply to Euro 4 which means changes to the I-6, a new 5.0 V8 and Liquid Injection LPG for fleet engines. On top of that the Ecoboost I-4 Falcon and Territory with new top hat and diesel engine is released later this year or early 2011. FoA can't begin to look at the next product cycle until they get all of those products delivered so no wonder the decision has been left until next year. I'm sure they will present a good business case for a vehicles to fill Australia's changing needs, Falcon still out sells Mondeo by about 6:1 so RWD is still popular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherminator98 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I'm sure they will present a good business case for a vehiclesto fill Australia's changing needs, Falcon still out sells Mondeo by about 6:1 so RWD is still popular. But also the top selling vehicles in Australia are FWD, many Toyotas....so why doesn't the Mondeo sell better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I just don't see that happening. Not that I disagree with you. It just ain't happening. Look at the Focus. It's a volume model. It could afford some regional changes. But they didn't. Even the door unlocks are on the center stacks ala Europe. So Alan won't be allowing that much of a difference in cars. If it's good for one, it has to be good for all. One Ring to Rule them All... That rule does not apply to niche and regional vehicles, there's still some "wiggle room" under One Ford. RWD vehicles are no longer considered volume product in the same respect as Focus and Fusion so they play by slightly different rules. Currently, FNA is dividing up work on the next Gen Fusion and Mondeo between itself and other regions, I can see this situation happening with a future RWD used for Falcon, Mustang - the top hats and floor pans are so different that you really need to assign two development teams. The real benefits from common architecture come at the supplier level, not at the manufacturing floor, so provided a future Falcon/Mustang used common power trains, electrials and suspensions, that's all that really needs to be done to secure scales of economy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 But also the top selling vehicles in Australia are FWD, many Toyotas....so why doesn't the Mondeo sell better? Yaris/Corrola/Camry flog shit out of Fiesta/Focus/Mondeo, buyers in that zone are very price sensitive and I sense Ford is very volume and product restricted until Thailand manufacturing comes on stream. Government fleets are moving away from Falcon and Commodore to Corolla and Camry, again price Falcon sells well in it large vehicle sector, it's just that the Fiesta/Focus/Mondeo do very poorly. Ford Australia are very worried about swapping Falcon for Taurus, they don't want to go 4 for 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2b2 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I agree with what is being said here, a midsize Falcon makes a lot more sense for Ford than a fullsize Falcon. Realistically, the Mustang is going to need a new chassis eventually, and I doubt Ford is wanting to go any bigger than the current car. It would make sense for Ford to build the Mustang and Falcon on the same size platform and share parts. Ford could also build a Mercury or Lincoln variant of both the sedan and coupe versions of the platform, which would maximize the volume for profitability. It would also make it possible for the Mustang to make its way down to Australia, I'm sure the Aussies wouldn't mind that. Ford Mustang (Coupe) - 3.7L V6 base, 5.0L V8 GT, 5.0L TT GT500 Ford Falcon (Sedan) - 2.0L EB base, 3.5L EB ST, 5.0L V8 GT Mercury Cougar (Coupe) - 2.0L EB base, 3.5L EB XR6 Lincoln MKR (Coupe and Sedan) - 3.7L base, 3.5L EB optional, 5.0L TT in performance spec. The Ford and Lincoln models could be globally available, while the Merury Cougar would be U.S. only. otoh if the COUGAR was a 2-door Falcon, they could both be global Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 (edited) It's funny how articles predicting the demise of the Falcon come out the day before articles heralding the possible return of Commodore to the USA as a Chevrolet. What happens is that Ford gives the journalists no confirmation on Falcon's future while GM blurts out pie in the sky plans for Zeta RWDs only to shelve them later....... It's really quite funny and predictable that the pro GM sites start spreading disinformation to try to distract people from Ford's ever increasing success and the launch of the Focus. Edited January 12, 2010 by jpd80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deanh Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 It's funny how articles predicting the demise of the Falcon come out the day beforearticles heralding the possible return of Commodore to the USA as a Chevrolet. What happens is that Ford gives the journalists no confirmation on Falcon's future while GM blurts out pie in the sky plans for Zeta RWDs only to shelve them later....... It's really quite funny and predictable that the pro GM sites start spreading disinformation to try to distract people from Ford's ever increasing success and the launch of the Focus. I think this thread should be altered from Adios Falcon to Coming soon, a more modern, better performing UPDATED Falcon....and maybe spice it up with....get ready, its worth waiting for,,,,,GRWD is coming I say...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I think this thread should be altered from Adios Falcon to Coming soon, a more modern, better performing UPDATED Falcon....and maybe spice it up with....get ready, its worth waiting for,,,,,GRWD is coming I say...... Would be nice! I want a RWD midsize Lincoln!!!! :-D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I think this thread should be altered from Adios Falcon to Coming soon, a more modern, better performing UPDATED Falcon....and maybe spice it up with....get ready, its worth waiting for,,,,,GRWD is coming I say...... Last month Jim Farley answered a direct question on the Falcon from similar Aussie journalists regarding whether it was being discontinued, his reply was, "No way!" The "rumor" is that the next Falcon in July will have a different body and if that's the case, you watch those same journalists turn right around and gush all over the new bird of prey...... A while back, Ford discovered that the corporate v6 doesn't fit under the Falcon's hood, it's too tall. That would mean the Hood and waist line would have to be raised to accommodate US V6 engines, changing the whole look of the vehicle. Perfect timing for planning alternative sheet metal..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deanh Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Would be nice! I want a RWD midsize Lincoln!!!! :-D a few little "slips" by some whom seem/we know to have inside info, leads me to beleive that IS the case.....and the timeframe suits a Mustang refresh as well......2 Falcons one stone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twintornados Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 ....so why doesn't the Mondeo sell better? Because it's a Mondeo....just ask Jelly..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2b2 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 (edited) I just don't see that happening. Not that I disagree with you. It just ain't happening. Look at the Focus. It's a volume model. It could afford some regional changes. But they didn't. Even the door unlocks are on the center stacks ala Europe. So Alan won't be allowing that much of a difference in cars. If it's good for one, it has to be good for all. One Ring to Rule them All... with the Focus, Ford could be doing a strict proof-of-concept of the OneFord dictum and After that, be a bit more flexible about it & "Ash Lincoln durbatulúk, ash Mercury gimbatul, ash Ford thrakatulûk agh luune-burzum-ishi krimpatul; mi Dearbornien man merka-rokko nornoro" :D Ford Aust is really busy this year with the release of the series II FG Falcon by July, the engines have tocomply to Euro 4 which means changes to the I-6, a new 5.0 V8 and Liquid Injection LPG for fleet engines. On top of that the Ecoboost I-4 Falcon and Territory with new top hat and diesel engine is released later this year or early 2011. what a Perfectly WONDERFUL time to visit Australia!!! ,,,,GRWD is coming I say...... ME TOO!!!! (tho I wouldn't exactly claim to have a firm grasp on reality...) Would be nice! I want a RWD midsize Lincoln!!!! :-D with an EB-inline-6!!!!!! ...A while back, Ford discovered that the corporate v6 doesn't fit under the Falcon's hood, it's too tall.That would mean the Hood and waist line would have to be raised to accommodate US V6 engines, changing the whole look of the vehicle... this I have trouble believing Edited January 13, 2010 by 2b2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2b2 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 (edited) oops Edited January 13, 2010 by 2b2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moosetang Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 On a related Note Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueblood Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 You're absolutely certain? Well that's what Mulally said.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMSA-XJR9 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Falc'man posted the following on TMS . . . Video http://au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/sunrise/vide...edded-video-top Ford has quickly hosed-down the latest speculation that tried to spell the end of the local Falcon. The 'One Ford' program announced by Ford's American chief, Alan Mulally at the Detroit Auto show aims to simplify the company's global model lineup - less different nameplates and platforms sold in more countries means lower development and production costs. Ford says, rather than beginning the end of the Falcon, this means future Falcons will be integrated into the global scheme. The logical replacement for the Falcon as Ford's large car in Australia would be the front-wheel-drive Taurus. 'Not so' says Ford - the hot-selling, iconic Mustang coupe is rear-wheel-drive, so the company will continue to develop rear-wheel-drive platforms and the next Falcon could share that platform with the Mustang. According to Ford Australia, with the current FG generation Falcon scheduled to run - with several upgrades and facelifts in the pipeline - for another four years and the Territory SUV slated for production until 2016, the company's future is already being mapped out and is bright. A key plank in that future is the current $230 million investment in new powertrain technologies for the Falcon - including a fuel-efficient four-cylinder engine. Rather than the first chapter in a eulogy for the Falcon, Ford's 'One Ford' program could deliver Australian buyers a new global perspective on design and a platform shared with the Mustang - that would seem to be good news for the Falcon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 (edited) This from Australian Ford Forums: Originally Posted by JPFS1 I've seen documentation with our local program and Mustang on under the same code name. It's been in the works for a while I believe, it's now surfacing and I'm sure it's very close to the truth. Very interesting...... Edited January 13, 2010 by jpd80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OHV 16V Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Can't help but wonder if a mid-size RWD Falcon, sharing both parts and a platform with the Stang in the future, has a much better chance of actually making it stateside. Please Ford, PLEASE!.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falcman Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Well that's what Mulally said.... That's what the stupid bogan Aussie press said that he said. I think this thread should be altered from Adios Falcon to Coming soon, a more modern, better performing UPDATED Falcon....and maybe spice it up with....get ready, its worth waiting for,,,,,GRWD is coming I say......+1 Someone change this title. We were given the inside info LAST WEEK (or was the week before?) regarding this matter, by Blue II and wescoent, Re Falcon & Lincoln. I am appalled by our media here (and just about any media for that matter). Complete ignorance - and in the context of what Ford's agenda was at NAIAS - and bordering on disrespect. Stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Let's hope the US media pick up the real story and Ford comes out and confirms it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.