Jump to content

Front Drive Designs Almost Became the Mustang


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

In the dark ages of the early 80's, Car & Driver was constantly saying "As soon as Detroit switches to all FWD..." and going on and on about it. They even thought that K cars having only 4 bangers in 1981 was 'spot on'. But then they didn't give German lux makes grief for building "gas hogs".

 

By the late 80's they finally stopped preaching "FWD for all".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those really were the dark ages. I remember reading a story as a kid in 1980 or 1981 in the German car magazine "Auto, Motor und Sport" about the future of American cars according to General Motors. GM announced that all cars were going to be FWD and no more V8 engines. I was very disappointed. Those were the days before the world wide web, so informations on American cars were hard to get in Germany. I remember being reliefed when they showed the 1983 Mustang 5.0 GT in another issue of "Auto, Motor und Sport" in January of 1983.

In 1982 GM introduced the 3rd generation of the Camaro in Germany and called it Z28 E, the "E" stood for Europe. I was there for the introduction at an Opel dealership in Nuremberg that also sold American GM-cars. A salesman told me that it was delivered to them without an engine, so they installed a 4-cylinder Opel Kadett engine. Bad times, indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Chevy Beretta was supposed to be the 'all new Camaro' to compete with the 'Probe-stang'. Dodge had the K car based Daytona, so it looked like things were moving to all FWD.

 

However, mainstream Import makes were sticking with some RWD cars, such as the Supra and Z, so that also could have effected desicion to keep RWD Stang and F body.

 

BTW, some said the article was 'old news', and yeah, we know about the 1988 Probe. But new info to me was that Ford was still looking into FWD Mustangs for 1993-94 run, based on the Escort. Then, they swtiched to revamping the Fox chassis into SN95.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the dark ages of the early 80's, Car & Driver was constantly saying "As soon as Detroit switches to all FWD..." and going on and on about it. They even thought that K cars having only 4 bangers in 1981 was 'spot on'. But then they didn't give German lux makes grief for building "gas hogs".

 

By the late 80's they finally stopped preaching "FWD for all".

 

I still remember the Car and Driver cover blurb for the introduction of the Dodge Daytona (the 1984 K-car based Daytona, not the 1969 version based on the Dodge Charger that is worth a small fortune today):

 

"What the Camaro and Firebird could have been."

 

Not quite...

Edited by grbeck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still remember the Car and Driver cover blurb for the introduction of the Dodge Daytona (the 1984 K-car based Daytona, not the 1969 version based on the Dodge Charger that is worth a small fortune today):

 

"What the Camaro and Firebird could have been."

 

Not quite...

I got rear-ended in stopped traffic by a Daytona when I was in the old '93 Taurus. The Daytona didn't fare too well -- the whole front clip was gone. The Taurus had a couple scrapes and it set off the fuel inertia switch. :rockon:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that all of the Probes and (most) MX6es were built by AutoAlliance Int'l at Flat Rock. Ford deserves at least as much credit as Mazda.

Mazda owed the plant fully when mine was built. It did not become Auto Alliance until a year later. Also, the manufacturers plate says built by Mazda Motors, not Auto Alliance and not by Ford. Ford only gets credit for design input, but not construction and assembly except for the 3.0 liter U code V6 engine.

 

wqmk.jpg

Edited by StangBang
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st gens had turbo issues with about 100/120K on the engine. 2ed gens were the distributors and plug wires with the V6 (Spark plugs are a PITA to change) The bad thing with them was typical Ford Decontenting in the 90's. The First Year (89, 93) had the most features/options then as the years went by things like the EQ, and glovebox lights got removed.

 

Cougar like all CDW127 were horrid in reliability. (Mondeo, Contour, Mystique, Cougar, X-type)

 

I had an 89 probe GT, I traded it in with 166k miles never had any problems with the engine. I beat on it hard too. The rest of the car started going. Heater fan, windows, headlights all inoperable. Still ran great. I had it in Germany for 2 years and remember driving to Munich with the cruse set at 100mph with the a/c on. The boost would peg on every hill and I would pass everyone. LOL that was fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a 91 Probe with a 5 speed. Loved that car but it had plenty of issues. Had the head replaced and the starter within 1 year of owning it.

 

Loved the car otherwise, loved the way it drove and was super comfy. Always got plenty of compliments. I actually bought it after getting rid of one my Mustangs. The ride was amazingly better and was much easier to drive long distances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sales were pretty good... remember back then Fords common practice was to leave cars to wither on the vine and by 1995 it was already said the car would be killed off. Supposedly Ford wasn't ready to reinvest much on the car because new fed regulations would have required passenger vehicles to come with standard dual airbags, etc. Aerostar and Tbird also killed the same year.

 

Model year

1993 119,754

1994 85,502

1995 59,261

1996 30,079

1997 16,777

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got rear-ended in stopped traffic by a Daytona when I was in the old '93 Taurus. :rockon:

 

 

 

 

HOLY CRAP. I got rear-ended in stopped traffic by a Daytona when I was in an '88 Taurus.

 

 

So what you're saying is don't stop in front of a Daytona while driving a Taurus, got it ...... lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Or an old Taurus for that matter....

 

I still drive a 97 Taurus with 195K miles on it. A couple years ago I got rear ended by a Honda Civic. The Civic was totaled and I had a scratched bumper and a bent tailpipe. I drove home. The guy in the Civic was amazed at the damage disparity and asked me what kind of car I was driving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something about Civics and Accord-ians I've noticed is that even in the smallest rear end accidents, thry crumple up like an accordian and are easily a total lose.

 

How true. Back in 1985, I had a 1983 Lynx RS. On the Harbor Freeway in downtown Los Angeles, a Cadillac Cimarron rear-ended a Honda Accord which rear ended me (thank you 5 mph bumpers). No damage at all to my car or the Cimarron. The Accord's rear quarter panels were buckled outwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...