PREMiERdrum Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 From what I've heard, the Navigator will in fact share the wheelbase of the longer Expedition, but will have a shorter overall length thanks to a dramatically shorter rear overhang. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 (edited) So if Ford does not shrink the Navigator for its LWB concept proportions, does that open the door for another 3-row Utility below it? It seems a little strange, sorry can't get my head around 2 x WBs for Expedition and only one for Navigator... Edited March 29, 2016 by jpd80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREMiERdrum Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 So if Ford does not shrink the Navigator for its LWB concept proportions, does that open the door for another 3-row Utility below it? It seems a little strange, sorry can't get my head around 2 x WBs for Expedition and only one for Navigator... There will absolutely be an Aviator slotting in below it. Remember that the 2nd wheelbase option for Navigator only came about because of Expedition having to stretch out to replace the Excursion. This new Gator isn't just trying to be a direct Escalade and ESV alternative... they have a very different mission this time around and a LWB/short overhang configuration is going to give them the exact look and capability they're looking for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BORG Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 (edited) I find it highly improbably that the Expedition/Navigator program is big enough to support 3 different wheelbase lengths - Expedition SWB, Expedition LWB, and a Navigator that splits the difference. I'm sure the Navigator will just be LWB if reports that it will only be available with only 1 size is true. I also stand by my observation earlier that I believe the concept is a preview for LWB (only?) version and not the SWB. The Navigator concept looks to be based on the shorter wheelbase but with a notably longer overhang than the current vehicles (or the Expedition mules). I think we still have just 2 wheelbase configurations coming and the Navigator will be riding on the shorter variant but will feature a longer body (which people seem to think is the L but ignore that the wheelbase and door cut outs reference the shorter configuration). The Navigator L largely exists because it's an Expedition, not because it's a vehicle they need for the next-generation which they are now free to design on their own. Considering the significance of the proportions on the concept and how close to production those concepts are, I think this gives us a pretty good hint at how different this vehicle is from the anticipated Expedition layout. Lincoln doesn't need to design two different Navigators when their customers only need one that is the right size...splitting hairs gets unsustainably expensive...Lincoln isn't selling a truck this time and their customers are different than Ford's. It would be one thing if Navigator had a huge customer base, but it doesn't so they are not obligated to follow the previous formula. Edited March 30, 2016 by BORG 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 The Expedition concept looks to be based on the shorter wheelbase but with a notably longer overhang than the current vehicles (or the Expedition mules). I think we still have just 2 wheelbase configurations coming and the Navigator will be riding on the shorter variant but will feature a longer body (which people seem to think is the L but ignore that the wheelbase and door cut outs reference the shorter configuration). The Navigator L largely exists because it's an Expedition, not because it's a vehicle they need for the next-generation which they are now free to design on their own. Considering the significance of the proportions on the concept and how close to production those concepts are, I think this gives us a pretty good hint at how different this vehicle is from the anticipated Expedition layout. Lincoln doesn't need to design two different Navigators when their customers only need one that is the right size...splitting hairs gets unsustainably expensive...Lincoln isn't selling a truck this time and their customers are different than Ford's. It would be one thing if Navigator had a huge customer base, but it doesn't so they are not obligated to follow the previous formula. Navigator concept not Expedition... Anyway, I guess it wasn't on this forum (I'm too lazy to browse through the pages as I'm on my phone), but I pointed out the similarities between the Navigator concept's wheelbase and door layout compared to the spied Expediton mules. And yes, I agree Borg, that Navigator will ride on Expy's short wheelbase and that its rear overhand was/will be also longer than Expy's. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBirdStangSkyliner Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 (edited) From what I've heard, the Navigator will in fact share the wheelbase of the longer Expedition, but will have a shorter overall length thanks to a dramatically shorter rear overhang. This makes way more sense to me than those who are predicting the inverse. A short wheelbase with an extended rear seems totally dorky and the exact opposite of what Lincoln would want for ride quality and second row room. From my travels across the western 5/8ths of the country (I have hit every state in this region, except New Mexico, in the last year), I just don't see many SWB Expy's/Navi's new enough to carry the redesigned grill-work. I don't know the sales figures, but the shorties seem to be waning out-west. Less room and a choppier ride for almost the same cost and fuel mileage isn't a very appealing equation. Any enhanced offroad capability for the short Expy's is, at best, murky or irrelevant to most buyers. It's not like anyone equates this class of vehicle to the Bronco's of 45 years ago. Edited March 31, 2016 by TBirdStangSkyliner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 (edited) This makes way more sense to me than those who are predicting the inverse. A short wheelbase with an extended rear seems totally dorky and the exact opposite of what Lincoln would want for ride quality and second row room. From my travels across the western 5/8ths of the country (I have hit every state in this region, except New Mexico, in the last year), I just don't see many SWB Expy's/Navi's new enough to carry the redesigned grill-work. I don't know the sales figures, but the shorties seem to be waning out-west. Less room and a choppier ride for almost the same cost and fuel mileage isn't a very appealing equation. Any enhanced offroad capability for the short Expy's is, at best, murky or irrelevant to most buyers. It's not like anyone equates this class of vehicle to the Bronco's of 45 years ago. Here was my reasoning.... This is the regular length Expedition. The top of the door has a straight cut/opening at the top of the rear door (whether or not this is just a mule characteristic or not, I don't know). Then look at the cut out for the wheel well, which begins roughly 1/4 to 1/3 of the way into the wheel well, arching down to the bottom of the door. Now look at the Navigator concept. (I put the explanation below to get the images closer to each other) The top of the door clearly has a forward rake to it, somewhat similar to the current model, but more noticably - different from the Expedition. Now look to the bottom of the door and the cutout for the rear wheel well......as with Expedition, it begins rougly 1/4 to 1/3 of the way into the wheel well, also arching down to the bottom of the door (which would be where the blue paint ends in production). Therefore, I'm thinking it shares its wheelbase with the regular length Expedition....but, the Navigator concept to me does appear to have a longer area behind the rear wheel than the Expedition. For comparison, here is the Expy EL... Edited April 1, 2016 by rmc523 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fordmantpw Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Those gullwing doors on the Navi look longer than two normal doors on the standard length Expy. Just my $0.02 on that issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBirdStangSkyliner Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Those gullwing doors on the Navi look longer than two normal doors on the standard length Expy. Just my $0.02 on that issue. I see it that way too, but it is hard to tell for sure. The single door and change in wheel size and greenhouse proportions all mess with the overall comparisons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 (edited) Here's a production model: Edited April 1, 2016 by rmc523 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 More colors: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fordmantpw Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Great work rmc! This color looks great! More colors: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harley Lover Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Hey RMC, can you try to graft the Continental headlights (with the separate elements) onto the Navi? I'm really hoping the production Navi will share that design element with the Conti, I do not like the "squinting" appearance of the headlights on the Navi concept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Great work rmc! This color looks great! That looks just like the Luxe MKX we picked up last night. It is a fantastic color. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fordmantpw Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 That looks just like the Luxe MKX we picked up last night. It is a fantastic color. And the pics of this new MKX are where? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 And the pics of this new MKX are where? Waiting for the rain to stop! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fordmantpw Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Waiting for the rain to stop! OK, you get a pass for now... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Found an identical one in dealer stock..... 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Hey RMC, can you try to graft the Continental headlights (with the separate elements) onto the Navi? I'm really hoping the production Navi will share that design element with the Conti, I do not like the "squinting" appearance of the headlights on the Navi concept. Well, I did alter the headlights that followed the concept's look, as I believe that will probably carry over to production Here's a comparison. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bzcat Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 (edited) Here was my reasoning.... This is the regular length Expedition. The top of the door has a straight cut/opening at the top of the rear door (whether or not this is just a mule characteristic or not, I don't know). Then look at the cut out for the wheel well, which begins roughly 1/4 to 1/3 of the way into the wheel well, arching down to the bottom of the door. Now look at the Navigator concept. (I put the explanation below to get the images closer to each other) The top of the door clearly has a forward rake to it, somewhat similar to the current model, but more noticably - different from the Expedition. Now look to the bottom of the door and the cutout for the rear wheel well......as with Expedition, it begins rougly 1/4 to 1/3 of the way into the wheel well, also arching down to the bottom of the door (which would be where the blue paint ends in production). Therefore, I'm thinking it shares its wheelbase with the regular length Expedition....but, the Navigator concept to me does appear to have a longer area behind the rear wheel than the Expedition. For comparison, here is the Expy EL... Actually, after this series of comparison, I'm more convinced then ever that Navigator concept is LWB. If you take the Expedition EL and make the rear doors slanted and about 3 inches longer (rather than straight down), it will cut into the wheel wells just like the Navigator concept. Either way, one thing for sure - Expedition EL will have a much better look and more balanced proportions based than the existing one on these photos. Edited April 1, 2016 by bzcat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTAUS Posted April 2, 2016 Author Share Posted April 2, 2016 RMC, Thats a great graft, cept the lower fascia opening is actually centered. Ford has a nasty habit of having an off-centered ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREMiERdrum Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 Actually, after this series of comparison, I'm more convinced then ever that Navigator concept is LWB. If you take the Expedition EL and make the rear doors slanted and about 3 inches longer (rather than straight down), it will cut into the wheel wells just like the Navigator concept. Either way, one thing for sure - Expedition EL will have a much better look and more balanced proportions based than the existing one on these photos. From what I was told, the production Navigator will be on the LWB but with a much shorter overhang than the Expedition EL. I'm thinking that the Gator's rear doors will be longer, with the 2nd and 3rd row seats shifted back to make use of the extra length. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 (edited) RMC, Thats a great graft, cept the lower fascia opening is actually centered. Ford has a nasty habit of having an off-centered ones. Actually, I used the Conti's lower grille, so technically it's not centered even though from the angle it looks like it hehe. Thanks though! I wish I could've gotten it out more quickly to get some more traffic seeing it (when the Navigator threads were busier), but oh well! Edited April 2, 2016 by rmc523 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harley Lover Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 Well, I did alter the headlights that followed the concept's look, as I believe that will probably carry over to production I understand - I was hoping to see how it would look if it adopted the 'corporate look' established by the Continental: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-150 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 That rear makes me think Explorer more than RR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.