Blue Oval Guide Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 http://www.blueovalnews.com/index.php?cate...p2_articleid=76 This baby is sure to be a winner. . .as long as the design is not watered down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel_leavitt2000 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Not bad. Sure looks angry dosen't it? I like that. http://www.blueovalnews.com/index.php?cate...p2_articleid=76 This baby is sure to be a winner. . .as long as the design is not watered down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fllcobra Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 (edited) Wow, pretty nice indeed. I can only hope it stays true to form if and when it hits production. How long do you think it will take Toyota to rip off that headlamp style? Edited December 29, 2005 by fllcobra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsgnome Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Oh snap! that loosk great! hope ford doesn't pull a Zephyr on us... Loving the headlights! Toyota will have their facimile ready before this car hits the market... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FRdesign Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Thats Awesome!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrballsonya Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Pretty nice, give it some power, keep it close to the concept and I think we have an honest luxury car contender. It's nice to know that Ford still has some decent designers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertlane Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 How long do you think it will take Toyota to rip off that headlamp style? My bet is that the engineers and Toyota are already working on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH-HA Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 (edited) Once the coolness of seeing it for the first time wears off, you see that's it's more generic luxury car design than something ground breaking. Also, if you removed the badges, you would be hard pressed to find anyone that could identify it as being a Lincoln. Even more ironic was at the preview a few weeks ago, Ford designers including Horbury were rambling on about American design and then they show the MKS, which is very un-American looking. Don't get me wrong, it's an attractive car, but come 2008MY, this won't be anything that stands out or be anything entirely special. Edited December 29, 2005 by AH-HA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one2gamble Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 I am somewhere between AH-HA and impressed. The front looks great, and for some reason I see some IOSIS in it. I dont know about its profile though, it looks as though it will be pretty generic. Ill wait till more better pictures come out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ml Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 (edited) I think it looks Great! They are going to have to have decent technology if they want me to buy one however. Edited December 29, 2005 by ml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkoesel Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 What happened to the egg-crate grill? Did we change directions again? I need to see a side profile and tail-lights to pass judgement on this one. But it looks pretty good so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardJensen Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 What happened to the egg-crate grill? Did we change directions again? I need to see a side profile and tail-lights to pass judgement on this one. But it looks pretty good so far. Obviously an egg-crate grille would look crappy on a car like that. Horbury said that there's no reason why Lincoln can't have TWO grille designs (and it's rather depressing that he would actually have to say such a thing). The egg-crate looks like it will be used on the SUVs/CUVs/truck, while the waterfall (which traces its descent from the old Lincoln K-Series in the 20s and 30s) remains on the cars. ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
96 Pony Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Hmmmm - that front end looks vaguely familiar to me . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 I see a bit of Acura RL in the overall shape. And yes, it's not the most original design, but it's certainly a classy-looking luxury car, which is a great place for Lincoln to start rebuilding its image. They don't necessesarily need to be bold to sell. As long as the quality and luxury is there and doesn't look outdated (which this certainly doesn't) then it should fare relatively well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sf15618 Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 That looks great!!!! I hope the production version is very close to this prototype. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcsario Posted December 29, 2005 Share Posted December 29, 2005 Once the coolness of seeing it for the first time wears off, you see that's it's more generic luxury car design than something ground breaking. Also, if you removed the badges, you would be hard pressed to find anyone that could identify it as being a Lincoln. Even more ironic was at the preview a few weeks ago, Ford designers including Horbury were rambling on about American design and then they show the MKS, which is very un-American looking. Don't get me wrong, it's an attractive car, but come 2008MY, this won't be anything that stands out or be anything entirely special. Sorry, but after all your laughable hype towards everything GM, especially the Escalade ("breathtaking / OMG ITS SO AWESMOE WAIT TIL YUO SEE IT / BEST INTERIORz EVARRRRRR!!11!1! UP TEHRE WITH TEH AUDI-BMW-MB!!1"), you lost all credibility when it comes to making credible comments in design matters, forever. Stick with spitting out what you heard at lunch. BTW, this statement... "Once the coolness of seeing it for the first time wears off, you see that's it's more generic car design than something ground breaking. Also, if you removed the badges, you would be hard pressed to find anyone that could identify it as being a (?)" ...is pretty funny/ironic, coming from a GM cheerleader like yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HC_Earwicker Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Nice looking car - at least from the front. Will have to see other angles before passing any judgment. One question - is this close to being a production design? If so, where does it fit in the Lincoln line-up? Is this the new LS or the new Continental - it seems a bit small to be the next Town Car. - HCE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Nice looking car - at least from the front. Will have to see other angles before passing any judgment. One question - is this close to being a production design? If so, where does it fit in the Lincoln line-up? Is this the new LS or the new Continental - it seems a bit small to be the next Town Car. - HCE I'm guess this will replace the LS and slot between the Zephyr and Town Car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTAUS Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 "Hmmmm - that front end looks vaguely familiar to me . . . " Yes, it looks very familiar, Mark my words Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichardJensen Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Isn't there supposed to be a "Continental" in there somewhere? That's the "bigger" model. More interior room than the Five Hundred. With similar (although probably more conservative styling), this new Continental should have similar "presence". ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PolarBear Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Pretty nice, give it some power, keep it close to the concept and I think we have an honest luxury car contender. It's nice to know that Ford still has some decent designers. I think you nailed it, right there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Posted December 30, 2005 Share Posted December 30, 2005 Not bad. Sure looks angry dosen't it? I like that. If you've seen the Zephyr in person, it has the same type of attitude. Which I think is great, and it definitely sets it apart from the Fusion/Milan sisters, as well as the competition. But somehow the Zeph's attitude gets lost in most pictures I've seen. So hopefully we'll get a bunch of pictures for this one. I especially would like to see the taillights/rearend of this car, hopefully they "ended" this car in a good way. Where the Zeph seems to disconnect from its attitude and the message it's trying to convey, when you get to the rear of the car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkoesel Posted December 31, 2005 Share Posted December 31, 2005 Obviously an egg-crate grille would look crappy on a car like that. Horbury said that there's no reason why Lincoln can't have TWO grille designs (and it's rather depressing that he would actually have to say such a thing). The egg-crate looks like it will be used on the SUVs/CUVs/truck, while the waterfall (which traces its descent from the old Lincoln K-Series in the 20s and 30s) remains on the cars. ... I whole-heartedly disagree that it would "obviously" look crappy. That's not giving the Lincoln designers much credit all. To me the waterfall grill looks too much like mercury's grill. IMHO it would give the brand more strength it they unified the grill design. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenJ Posted January 1, 2006 Share Posted January 1, 2006 (edited) I still think this vehicle is a waste. The money would have been much better spent updating the panther or the LS sedan. I just don't picture it doing that well. The Buick Lucerne is pretty much the same thing minus AWD and a six speed auto and no one really notices it. Of course that's a bit of an older platform that that car is based off of. I just don't see this D3 Lincoln doing well. Ford should ditch FWD/ AWD route and go RWD like Cadillac. They have platforms to work off of. I guess they'd rather spend that money on money losers like Jaguar. Oh well. Too bad they won't stick with the SN195 to make a 4 door sedan or even just give the panther an Explorer like refresh. I keep hearing it is comming but I'm sick of waiting. This crap is unacceptable. And it probably won't even get an American V8. It will probably get the new Yamaha V8. They mine as well not even call it a Lincoln. It's just a Volvo rebadge with a Japanese motor. Who cares? Edited January 1, 2006 by StevenJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2b2 Posted January 2, 2006 Share Posted January 2, 2006 I really need more pix & info but think it's gonna largely come down to what engines offered. I hope for at least: ~270~hp 3.5v6 Awd(opt?) (ie Fusion-ST setup) ~310~hp 4.4 YamaVolvo v8 Awd only but ASAP bring out ~300~hp bored-out 3.8v6 higher hp 4.4v8 (forced induction?) then, of course, there's features &/vs price... btw, we don't even know where/when it'll be built yet, do we??? last question/comment - Since Ford knows the video 'escaped', why don't they let ONE gorgeous-dramatic-professional 'portrait' escape too? Too many people are getting their crucial first impression from a low quality video capture! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.