Jump to content

Time for new CEO?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, theoldwizard said:

No, they cut cars because they were not profitable.

 

I think Fusion/MKZ were probably eeking out a small profit especially since they're basically unchanged since 2013.  But they need to change Hermosillo over to C2 and they definitely needed to divert those resources to new vehicles.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akirby said:

 

I think Fusion/MKZ were probably eeking out a small profit especially since they're basically unchanged since 2013.  But they need to change Hermosillo over to C2 and they definitely needed to divert those resources to new vehicles.


I think it boils down to that cars aren’t going to make an 8% profit like a CUV would. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, silvrsvt said:


I think it boils down to that cars aren’t going to make an 8% profit like a CUV would. 

The cars that GM and Ford were definitely won't, anything that survives the great cull will have to be exceptional,

there's absolutely no point in making cars to fill volume in plants no longer needed. Lots of changes coming.

People need to focus less on what's being lost and and look forward to what's coming.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the CUV market gets more crowded, will that CUV/ SUV profitability remain?  The Koreans  jump in and right away they get all kinds of good press.  Or is that my imagination. 

Forget about the guys who drink blue Kool-Aid-myself included. It is not 1990 when Explorer had no significant competition.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bob Rosadini said:

As the CUV market gets more crowded, will that CUV/ SUV profitability remain?  The Koreans  jump in and right away they get all kinds of good press.  Or is that my imagination. 

Forget about the guys who drink blue Kool-Aid-myself included. It is not 1990 when Explorer had no significant competition.

 

I think the opportunity is there but it will be a much smaller piece of the pie due to all the competition, especially on the lower end.   That's why Ford is trying to invest in unique products like Bronco, Baby Bronco and special editions;   Explorer and Edge ST;  and hybrids and PHEVs.   These will have far less direct competition and higher ATPs and profit margins.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, akirby said:

 

I think the opportunity is there but it will be a much smaller piece of the pie due to all the competition, especially on the lower end.   That's why Ford is trying to invest in unique products like Bronco, Baby Bronco and special editions;   Explorer and Edge ST;  and hybrids and PHEVs.   These will have far less direct competition and higher ATPs and profit margins.

No argument there.  I just think Hackett is pushing the case that cars as we know them are dead. As the population ages "high ATP's" are going to be a consideration as not everyone in that population is going to be worried about..."gee that RMD time again-how am I going to spend that money".

 

Every time I see a Focus/ Fiesta, I try to notice the drivers- seems to me I see a young person or an elderly person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bob Rosadini said:

No argument there.  I just think Hackett is pushing the case that cars as we know them are dead. As the population ages "high ATP's" are going to be a consideration as not everyone in that population is going to be worried about..."gee that RMD time again-how am I going to spend that money".

 

Every time I see a Focus/ Fiesta, I try to notice the drivers- seems to me I see a young person or an elderly person.


Cars aren’t dead they’re just commoditized and Ford has better things to build and sell with limited resources.   And high ATPs doesn’t mean super expensive.  It just means selling more $30k escapes and less $30k edges.  It can still be done with lower price points given the right products.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, akirby said:


Cars aren’t dead they’re just commoditized and Ford has better things to build and sell with limited resources.   And high ATPs doesn’t mean super expensive.  It just means selling more $30k escapes and less $30k edges.  It can still be done with lower price points given the right products.

I'd love to see Puma in there instead of Ecosport to cover more of the +$18k sales that Focus used to cover,

a better use of the reconfigured "Fiesta" than as a $13k car.

 

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nickp said:

 

 

7 minutes ago, Nickp said:

I like Farley. I think this is only a good thing.

 

Ford said 2-3 years ago that these changes were going to hurt, I just think people underestimated just how much. I think they’re going to benefit greatly in the next 2-3 years.

I wonder if Hinrichs has been an ongoing problem, overseeing bad product launches like forever at Ford

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...