MY93SHO Posted May 9, 2020 Share Posted May 9, 2020 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92merc Posted May 9, 2020 Share Posted May 9, 2020 I noticed they took off the ball on the hitch and put some sort of pin/peg configuration. I've never seen that before. Not surprised on the engine... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted May 9, 2020 Share Posted May 9, 2020 (edited) 37 minutes ago, 92merc said: I noticed they took off the ball on the hitch and put some sort of pin/peg configuration. I've never seen that before. Not surprised on the engine... I believe it's an Al-Co coupler that makes the ball fully captive through a much wider angle, very handy when taking a caravan off roading, less chance of binding and breaking the coupler. The 19.19 liters / 100 km economy works out to be around 12 mpg, not bad for mixed driving in hilly and moderate open running Edited May 9, 2020 by jpd80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twintornados Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Closest comparison in the North American market would be Transit FS with the 3.2L Powerstroke vs Transit FS with the 2.0L Bi-Turbo. I would love to see a North American Ranger with the 2.3L Ecoboost sent there for the same test. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
probowler Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Raise your hand if you're bi-turbo. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGR Posted May 10, 2020 Share Posted May 10, 2020 Forbidden fruit? You may not be able to get certain engines, but at least you can get a Ranger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.