Jump to content

Has It Started?


Decker

Recommended Posts

Another sign of all this “inclusive” world discussed by American Leaders….

 

30 August 2021

UN Peace and Security Console

 

Thirteen of the 15 ambassadors voted in favor of the resolution, which further demands that Afghanistan not be used as a shelter for terrorism.

 

Permanent members China and Russia abstained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hostage crisis? 
What was the leaders thinking? Considering? What did the leaders, become?
What benefit for all who was in country, secured the country, and for those who lived a new life for the last 20 years? To run from Afghanistan now in this way benefits who and why? 
How could the leaders negotiate with even so called reformed terrorist's? How could the leaders pull all military support before all that needed to be evacuated, were?  


Is there some plan to push back from our position as a world super power? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rand Paul was correct, in all in aspects of calling out the good doctors untruths. This will go down in history as one of the largest cover ups of human experiments and death, unless the media has something to do with recorded history. 

 

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2021/09/07/anthony-fauci-lied-to-congress-investigation-by-the-intercept-reveals-u-s-funding-for-gain-of-function-research-at-the-wuhan-institute-of-virology/  

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a non-partisan statement as I can possibly make,

 

“Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.”

 

John Kennedy stated this to every American, on either side of the aisle, all walks of life to contribute in some way to the public good. To contribute to America, ourselves.  

But, the clear message of today’s ruling administration is?      “America”… owes… “you.”

 

How time has changed one tribes view of America.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Decker said:

As a non-partisan statement as I can possibly make,

 

“Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.”

 

John Kennedy stated this to every American, on either side of the aisle, all walks of life to contribute in some way to the public good. To contribute to America, ourselves.  

But, the clear message of today’s ruling administration is?      “America”… owes… “you.”

 

How time has changed one tribes view of America.

No one has ever improved themselves by stressing how much they are victimized and "owed". Should anyone "forget" slavery, the holocaust, mistreatment of labor? No. Or more precisely, hell no. Should we go on to achieve what we can, as far as we can, confident in the knowledge that our descendants can do even better? Of course. Our system isn't perfect, but compared to the alternates, it is our best hope.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Decker said:

Rand Paul was correct, in all in aspects of calling out the good doctors untruths. This will go down in history as one of the largest cover ups of human experiments and death, unless the media has something to do with recorded history. 

 

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2021/09/07/anthony-fauci-lied-to-congress-investigation-by-the-intercept-reveals-u-s-funding-for-gain-of-function-research-at-the-wuhan-institute-of-virology/  

 

 

I find this ironic.  Rand Paul never passed his board exams to be an opthamologist.  He created his own board which he, his wife and an uncle are the sole members.  He is self-certified but has the gaul to question other doctors and scientists who did the work and passed their board exams.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RedHoncho01 said:

I find this ironic.  Rand Paul never passed his board exams to be an opthamologist.  He created his own board which he, his wife and an uncle are the sole members.  He is self-certified but has the gaul to question other doctors and scientists who did the work and passed their board exams.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rand-paul-ophthalmologist/

 

Snopes claims he was certified by the ABO, the original specialist board established in 1916, until 2005 when he allowed his certification to lapse. Supposedly he established the NBO as a protest. Didn't go far as the NBO was dissolved in 2011. Since I'm not an opthalmologist or immunologist or an MD or DO, probably  not qualified to question? If that is the case, probably not many in Congress or on these humble pages qualified either. As for myself, I use an ABO certified opthalmologist. 

A far different question is whether Dr. Fauci in his capacity as a director, advocated for or funded risky research at WIV. Back on a Ford note, I know many managers and directors who do not have technical expertise who have responsibility to approve or oversee technical functions. Common in many industries, and government as well. Trust the "expert" but question them to develop that trust. Question my Doctor too. Sometimes I gain insight as to the "why" of a problem or condition. Sometimes they gain insight into my understanding.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RedHoncho01 said:

I find this ironic.  Rand Paul never passed his board exams to be an opthamologist.  He created his own board which he, his wife and an uncle are the sole members.  He is self-certified but has the gaul to question other doctors and scientists who did the work and passed their board exams.

Just wondering what that has to do with it? Do we just follow like sheep because he passed board exams? Sorry it makes no sense to me. How come some doctors and scientists get shut out and discredited even though they did the work also if they question the narrative?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, RedHoncho01 said:

I find this ironic.  Rand Paul never passed his board exams to be an opthamologist.  He created his own board which he, his wife and an uncle are the sole members.  He is self-certified but has the gaul to question other doctors and scientists who did the work and passed their board exams.

 

In any defense of ones views or feeling toward or on any subject or person of granted authority its human nature to take a personal view to defend ones thoughts. In a very high percentage of the manner of the personal view defense, in most cases the "spin" is just that. Looking at irony a bit loser, it wasn`t a questioning of the education achieved, level of medical application or even a question of applied medical theory.  The basic question was not even calling anything into question other than "honesty". The question wasn't one Doctor to another Doctor, it was an appointed government employee being questioned on the employee`s method of operation by an elected Federal representative. Nothing more.

 

The new evidence if in fact backs the asking of the question in the first place and puts facts in place that counters the answers given during a hearing then there is the point I was making about the good doctor just possibly had given a false representation of his method of operation. 

Edited by Decker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Decker said:

 

In any defense of ones views or feeling toward or on any subject or person of granted authority its human nature to take a personal view to defend ones thoughts. In a very high percentage of the manner of the personal view defense, in most cases the "spin" is just that. Looking at irony a bit loser, it wasn`t a questioning of the education achieved, level of medical application or even a question of applied medical theory.  The basic question was not even calling anything into question other than "honesty". The question wasn't one Doctor to another Doctor, it was an appointed government employee being questioned on the employee`s method of operation by an elected Federal representative. Nothing more.

 

The new evidence if in fact backs the asking of the question in the first place and puts facts in place that counters the answers given during a hearing then there is the point I was making about the good doctor just possibly had given a false representation of his method of operation. 

As a scientist, I follow the scientific theory that states you look at everything with an objective lens and not with a predetermined narrative.  You can go on the internet and YouTube and find just about anything to support your opinion.  The good thing about science is it relies and facts and opinions don't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, paintguy said:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rand-paul-ophthalmologist/

 

Snopes claims he was certified by the ABO, the original specialist board established in 1916, until 2005 when he allowed his certification to lapse. Supposedly he established the NBO as a protest. Didn't go far as the NBO was dissolved in 2011. Since I'm not an opthalmologist or immunologist or an MD or DO, probably  not qualified to question? If that is the case, probably not many in Congress or on these humble pages qualified either. As for myself, I use an ABO certified opthalmologist. 

A far different question is whether Dr. Fauci in his capacity as a director, advocated for or funded risky research at WIV. Back on a Ford note, I know many managers and directors who do not have technical expertise who have responsibility to approve or oversee technical functions. Common in many industries, and government as well. Trust the "expert" but question them to develop that trust. Question my Doctor too. Sometimes I gain insight as to the "why" of a problem or condition. Sometimes they gain insight into my understanding.

So, it is partially true and partially falst about Rand Paul.

 

Dr. Fauci has over 50 years experience as an epidemiologist.  I love it when armchair science "experts" question the veracity of someone's expertise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RedHoncho01 said:

So, it is partially true and partially falst about Rand Paul.

 

Dr. Fauci has over 50 years experience as an epidemiologist.  I love it when armchair science "experts" question the veracity of someone's expertise.  

 

image.png.eeb5f2ab22a6efcac1739638bd5613ab.png

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RedHoncho01 said:

So, it is partially true and partially falst about Rand Paul.

 

Dr. Fauci has over 50 years experience as an epidemiologist.  I love it when armchair science "experts" question the veracity of someone's expertise.  

Not questioning his experience or expertise. Believe Senator Paul was questioning his judgement in working with the WIV and his veracity in characterizing the nature of the research authorized and conducted. I wish veracity in science and engineering were never in question, but we don't live in that world. With that said, I don't think Dr. Fauci is an out and out fraud like Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos. But he does seem to be minimizing any role of WIV. As for the Chinese, I go by the old Reagan quote: "Trust but verify". 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, paintguy said:

Not questioning his experience or expertise. Believe Senator Paul was questioning his judgement in working with the WIV and his veracity in characterizing the nature of the research authorized and conducted. I wish veracity in science and engineering were never in question, but we don't live in that world. With that said, I don't think Dr. Fauci is an out and out fraud like Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos. But he does seem to be minimizing any role of WIV. As for the Chinese, I go by the old Reagan quote: "Trust but verify". 

 

 

Rand Paul was showboating.  It's what he does.  He's a jerk and that's why his neighbor kicked his butt.  I lived in Kentucky for 20 years.  Paul was one of my senators.  He's famous for making unsubstantiated accusations much like he did in this case.  

Edited by RedHoncho01
clean up language and add to comment
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone hit the goofy shit on the head it was Kev-Mo. Nothing makes any sense... anywhere, anytime or any issue. 

 

White House calls WHO criticism on COVID booster shots a 'false choice'

 

Where is the good doctors wishy washy response to this latest umm maybe we should or umm maybe we shouldn`t or maybe umm??? 

 

Nothing makes any sense NOT A THING....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fast Facts About That Flu From China

 

Hero`s Take a Fall

 

(No, I’m not talking about Cuomo.)

Remember when doctors and nurses were frontline heroes, bravely risking their lives last year, back when COVID had that new virus smell? Now, many of those same luminaries are getting fired for not taking the vaccine, at a time when Delta is supposedly giving us the Enola Gay treatment. How can that be? If the nation is under attack by the China virus, we need every doctor and nurse we can get, right?

 

Then

 

Remember when the CDC was working on a vaccine for Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) and hid data suggesting that the jab put black males at an increased risk for autism?

“The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism.” — CDC senior scientist Dr. William Thompson

 

FACT-O-RAMA

 

The CDC estimates that almost 31,000 people die every year from the flu, but in 2020 they reported only 8,786 flu deaths, roughly a 71% drop. Weird, right?

 

https://pjmedia.com/columns/kevindowneyjr/2021/09/08/fast-facts-about-that-flu-from-china-n1476921

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2021 at 10:11 AM, RedHoncho01 said:

So, it is partially true and partially falst about Rand Paul.

 

Dr. Fauci has over 50 years experience as an epidemiologist.  I love it when armchair science "experts" question the veracity of someone's expertise.  

 

 

Other famous doctors were Josef Mengele and Jack Kevorkian

(Not all doctors use their training for good purposes) 

 

Fauci has been wrong across the board and diverted US dollars to China , the same place covid came from.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NEWS: White House official tells me USPS workers are NOT included in President Biden’s vaccine requirement, but “we strongly encourage them
to comply with these standards.”

 

That’s a massive chunk of the federal workforce — 644k & growing — that’s not required to be vaccinated.

 

Hopefully autoworkers as well ~

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, cal50 said:

NEWS: White House official tells me USPS workers are NOT included in President Biden’s vaccine requirement, but “we strongly encourage them
to comply with these standards.”

 

That’s a massive chunk of the federal workforce — 644k & growing — that’s not required to be vaccinated.

 

Hopefully autoworkers as well ~

Yet another example of liberal rules for thee and not for me. Doubt they will carve out much for autoworkers. The liberals are secure they will get the UAW endorsement, perhaps in exchange for "prosecutorial discretion". Nothing wrong with hairdresser appointments for Mayor Buzzcut of Chicago, Family vacations for Governor Fred Flintstone of Illinois. or dinners at French Laundry for Governor Dead Meat of California. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmmmm...

 

“One of the Red Cross requirements for plasma from routine blood and platelet donations that test positive for high-levels of antibodies to be used as convalescent plasma is that it must be from a donor that has not received a COVID-19 vaccine. This is to ensure that antibodies collected from donors have sufficient antibodies directly related to their immune response to a COVID-19 infection and not just the vaccine, as antibodies from an infection and antibodies from a vaccine are not the same.”

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cal50 said:

Hmmmmmm...

 

“One of the Red Cross requirements for plasma from routine blood and platelet donations that test positive for high-levels of antibodies to be used as convalescent plasma is that it must be from a donor that has not received a COVID-19 vaccine. This is to ensure that antibodies collected from donors have sufficient antibodies directly related to their immune response to a COVID-19 infection and not just the vaccine, as antibodies from an infection and antibodies from a vaccine are not the same.”

 

Imagine that

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two more reassuring statements and actions from our leaders 

 

1) Fauci: No ‘Firm Answer’ on Why Americans Who Recovered From COVID-19 Should Get Vaccinated. 
2) USPS = 650,000 plus employee`s don`t have the same risk`s of the Chinese Flu as other American work forces? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...