Captainp4 Posted May 21, 2022 Share Posted May 21, 2022 I can think of 8+ gas stations within a ~2 mile radius of where I'm sitting right now... 145k in the whole US doesn't seem accurate to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donaldo Posted May 22, 2022 Share Posted May 22, 2022 20 hours ago, atomcat68 said: This! I don't know how much more convenient it can get that not having to drive somewhere to fuel the car. Unless you make long trips, this is a great advantage. Also you have the potential to charge a lot of places you visit regularly. Going to work, the grocery store, a shopping mall, etc.are all opportunities to recharge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted May 22, 2022 Share Posted May 22, 2022 On 5/20/2022 at 10:48 PM, slemke said: Wouldn’t a better comparison be chargers compared to pumps? I’m pretty sure the charging station number is the number of charges, not locations to charge. Also need to factor in the throughput of how much time is spent at the pump vs charger. Home charging for daily driving takes some of the load off public charges, but not for trips. Yeah, that's what I was pointing out above, especially when you're spending much more time at a charger vs. a pump. You'll have to have a lot more chargers at a given location to equal the "refill" ability of a pump. But that also gets into the argument of charging at home, so it's hard to make a direct comparison. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted May 22, 2022 Share Posted May 22, 2022 35 minutes ago, rmc523 said: Yeah, that's what I was pointing out above, especially when you're spending much more time at a charger vs. a pump. You'll have to have a lot more chargers at a given location to equal the "refill" ability of a pump. But that also gets into the argument of charging at home, so it's hard to make a direct comparison. I hate to be a broken record but a lot of folks can’t charge at home because they’re in an apartment or condo or older home with limited electrical capacity. That’s why fast widely available public charging is a must for widespread BEV adoption. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slemke Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 5 hours ago, akirby said: I hate to be a broken record but a lot of folks can’t charge at home because they’re in an apartment or condo or older home with limited electrical capacity. That’s why fast widely available public charging is a must for widespread BEV adoption. Keep repeating it and maybe it will sink in. There are plenty of places that will need public chargers because charging at home is not an option. For those locations where at home charging is feasible, fewer public chargers are needed. RMC and I are talking about the required number of charging locations and chargers at those locations vs pumps. Without government interference the market would determine the locations and number of chargers. Neighborhoods without electric cars and newer neighborhoods with garages and plenty of electrical capacity for home charges wouldn’t get as many or any chargers but would have gas stations. Fast chargers will be needed along interstate travel corridors and high traffic areas for those that need to fill up on the go. Now at some point, we may need a rural electrification act 2.0 to finish building out the infrastructure. But, Tesla has been managing to do that on their own as they have now added super chargers along I94 in ND. I read recently that Tesla has raised the prices at their super chargers in California to $0.58 per kWh. So much for savings a 40mpg Maverick hybrid comes out ahead in cost of ownership. Hopefully Ford adds more hybrids to the portfolio including Mustang and if it becomes a reality Thunderbird. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atomcat68 Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 15 hours ago, akirby said: I hate to be a broken record but a lot of folks can’t charge at home because they’re in an apartment or condo or older home with limited electrical capacity. That’s why fast widely available public charging is a must for widespread BEV adoption. At one time, houses and buildings didn't have electricity at all or plumbing, or oil heat or natural gas, but the old houses were fitted with it over time or replaced. This is not an overnight change which is why I don't believe they hype that we will all drive BEV in a few years. At one time gas stations weren't a thing and you bought it at a pharmacy of all places. Another idea is that a city like Boston can place parking meters in every conceivable place, then why can't they all be charging stations too. You'd have a captive audience to pay the meter. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akirby Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 1 hour ago, atomcat68 said: At one time, houses and buildings didn't have electricity at all or plumbing, or oil heat or natural gas, but the old houses were fitted with it over time or replaced. This is not an overnight change which is why I don't believe they hype that we will all drive BEV in a few years. At one time gas stations weren't a thing and you bought it at a pharmacy of all places. Another idea is that a city like Boston can place parking meters in every conceivable place, then why can't they all be charging stations too. You'd have a captive audience to pay the meter. I think public charging is a better cheaper solution since most will only have to charge once a week or so, but we’ll certainly see changes on the residential side. Just thought of something - if most residents in apartments or condos only need to charge once per week maybe you could install a few fast chargers and assign residents charging times in 3 hour blocks once or twice a week. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FordBuyer Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 21 minutes ago, akirby said: I think public charging is a better cheaper solution since most will only have to charge once a week or so, but we’ll certainly see changes on the residential side. Just thought of something - if most residents in apartments or condos only need to charge once per week maybe you could install a few fast chargers and assign residents charging times in 3 hour blocks once or twice a week. I know a lot of new apartments and condos being built here are coming with charging stations in the car ports. And I would imagine over time many complexes will have to retrofit them to be competitive as more buy plugins or full electrics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvrsvt Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 4 hours ago, atomcat68 said: At one time, houses and buildings didn't have electricity at all or plumbing, or oil heat or natural gas, but the old houses were fitted with it over time or replaced. This is not an overnight change which is why I don't believe they hype that we will all drive BEV in a few years. At one time gas stations weren't a thing and you bought it at a pharmacy of all places. That is what too many people are getting their axles wrapped around. You buy a new ICE/Hybrid in say 2034, before a 2035 of BEV only production of vehicles....there is no one holding a gun to your head that you'll need to replace it because of that and you can enjoy it for an average of 12.1 years, which is currently the average life span of a car. I'm sure that once the market hits a certain amount of BEVs on the marketplace, there will be incentives for people who have older cars to switch over or they will be prodded to do so via fines etc (with in reason)...but at that point there shouldn't be much in the way of excuses for not getting one either. Just as another example, the first truly useful SUV/CUV was Jeep Cherokee in 1984, but I'd rather go with the 1989 Explorer instead because it had better legroom in the rear. The SUV market didn't get really stupid till almost 10 years later and didn't become market leading till 2015...expect to see something similar happen with BEVs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 On 5/23/2022 at 1:28 PM, silvrsvt said: That is what too many people are getting their axles wrapped around. You buy a new ICE/Hybrid in say 2034, before a 2035 of BEV only production of vehicles....there is no one holding a gun to your head that you'll need to replace it because of that and you can enjoy it for an average of 12.1 years, which is currently the average life span of a car. I'm sure that once the market hits a certain amount of BEVs on the marketplace, there will be incentives for people who have older cars to switch over or they will be prodded to do so via fines etc (with in reason)...but at that point there shouldn't be much in the way of excuses for not getting one either. Just as another example, the first truly useful SUV/CUV was Jeep Cherokee in 1984, but I'd rather go with the 1989 Explorer instead because it had better legroom in the rear. The SUV market didn't get really stupid till almost 10 years later and didn't become market leading till 2015...expect to see something similar happen with BEVs. the difference is SUVs were never/won’t ever be mandated like BEVs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvrsvt Posted May 24, 2022 Share Posted May 24, 2022 2 hours ago, rmc523 said: the difference is SUVs were never/won’t ever be mandated like BEVs. But also look at engines-by the 1980s almost all cars where some form of fuel injection due to emissions and fuel economy concerns that was implemented due to government regulations in the 1970s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeluxeStang Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 Now ford's testing a zo6. This is a strange approach they're taking, if they are indeed planning on bringing back the thunderbird. Insider reports indicate it will be a halo performance model. It's going to compete with the c8, Ford has expertise with making mid-engine cars, the gt is ending production, so it would make sense to want to offer something exotic once it's gone. Gm has proven a more obtainable supercar will sell like crazy, ford is benchmarking multiple mid-engine rivals. Yet inside reports are saying it'll be a front engine car? With a long hood and agressive fenders? So they're investing all these resources... to essentially make another mustang? Hopefully these reports are wrong, and it is indeed a mid-engine car. That would be the smart approach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANTAUS Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 GM's biggest issue with the Corvette is its legacy buyers, it's not who they wish to appeal to (insert Lincolns of yesteryear). I have "that" neighbor who just bought one... and I'm like "Yup over 65 check, Yup-just shave it off who we trying to kid with the comb-over, Yup in red, even though you'll do the speed limit in the left-most lane" Maybe Tibird Hiatus for awhile, might bring in new buyers... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe771476 Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 This generation doesn't even know what Thunderbird was! The generation that does know it, are old and not going to buy this. Let the Mustang handle it. How many Corvettes does Chevy sell, 20,000 units? Let me get this straight: They are dropping the Edge, but they want to build a T-Bird? Forget it! Who came up with this idea? The same guy who thought of buying Jag and LR and Volvo for billions, then spent billions to streamline and then sell those brands for 25% of what they put into it? Or the guy who thought of selling the farm tractor biz or the heavy truck biz that was just retooled in 1997 for almost nothing? That guy? To improve shareholder value? Decision-making at Ford does NOT impress me. Yeah I know who was in charge when these events happened. But I want to know the name of the moron in whose brain these ideas popped up in to begin with! The current Corvette is uglier than sin! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSchicago Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 (edited) As a former Thunderbird owner, I often wondered why this wasn't done sooner. Not like the showroom queens of that ended in 2005 though. Those sold horribly because every dealer thought that they were worth $10-$20K over sticker. They were nothing special underneath. Below are pics of ones Like I had. These are same colors and body styles. Both had 429's, the 68 had a 429 CJ swapped in. Edited September 19, 2022 by LSchicago 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 I really don’t see the point of this, especially if it’s ICE. Now if it were a test bed of a sports car BEV platform that Mustang could transition to, that would make more sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Handler Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 9 hours ago, LSchicago said: As a former Thunderbird owner, I often wondered why this wasn't done sooner. Not like the showroom queens of that ended in 2005 though. Those sold horribly because every dealer thought that they were worth $10-$20K over sticker. They were nothing special underneath. Below are pics of ones Like I had. These are same colors and body styles. Both had 429's, the 68 had a 429 CJ swapped in. It's nearly impossible to build a solid case for that type of car in today's market. Even Mercedes-Benz ended up discontinuing their famed S-Class Coupe. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeluxeStang Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 15 hours ago, Joe771476 said: This generation doesn't even know what Thunderbird was! The generation that does know it, are old and not going to buy this. Let the Mustang handle it. How many Corvettes does Chevy sell, 20,000 units? Let me get this straight: They are dropping the Edge, but they want to build a T-Bird? Forget it! Who came up with this idea? The same guy who thought of buying Jag and LR and Volvo for billions, then spent billions to streamline and then sell those brands for 25% of what they put into it? Or the guy who thought of selling the farm tractor biz or the heavy truck biz that was just retooled in 1997 for almost nothing? That guy? To improve shareholder value? Decision-making at Ford does NOT impress me. Yeah I know who was in charge when these events happened. But I want to know the name of the moron in whose brain these ideas popped up in to begin with! The current Corvette is uglier than sin! Which is why I say if Ford wants to take on the c8 with a halo performance model, do a mid-engine mustang as an extension of the mustang brand. Call it the mustang Cobra because the cobra was ford's real performance car rival to the Corvette. I don't hate the idea, I believe gm sells 30 some thousand corvettes a year, with an average transaction price of over 80k last time I checked. So it's the quality/profit from each sale that matters, not the quantity necessarily. It sounds like flat rock is begging for another product, but plant limitations prevent ford from making some high riding crossover there. I say make the halo performance car there alongside the mustang. Allows you to work towards optimizing your factory, while making a kickass sports car that'll elevate the brands image. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.