tbone Posted August 8, 2025 Author Share Posted August 8, 2025 I think the consensus is that Ford just didn’t compete for this contract, which is a damn shame, considering they had a suitable product for it. As a corporation, I would’ve viewed it as a point of pride to have one of my vehicles represented in the US military, but they must not see it the same way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted August 8, 2025 Share Posted August 8, 2025 4 hours ago, tbone said: I think the consensus is that Ford just didn’t compete for this contract, which is a damn shame, considering they had a suitable product for it. As a corporation, I would’ve viewed it as a point of pride to have one of my vehicles represented in the US military, but they must not see it the same way. Ranger SD would have made more sense engineering wise but the price Ford is asking is not intended for US consumption.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoonerLS Posted August 10, 2025 Share Posted August 10, 2025 On 8/8/2025 at 1:56 PM, tbone said: I think the consensus is that Ford just didn’t compete for this contract, which is a damn shame, considering they had a suitable product for it. As a corporation, I would’ve viewed it as a point of pride to have one of my vehicles represented in the US military, but they must not see it the same way. Having been tangentially involved with the Feds in a previous life, I can 100% understand why Ford wouldn’t want to be involved with them any more than they have to. Having to give up highly profitable sales to deal with it makes passing on the deal a no-brainer. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.