Jump to content

The Lexus LS Is Dead After 2026


rmc523

Recommended Posts

The Lexus LS Is Dead After 2026 And This Is Its Final Goodbye In America | Carscoops

 

It’s been more than three decades since Toyota introduced its luxury division with the original Lexus LS 400. Launched in 1989 as a 1990MY, the full-size sedan proved you didn’t need a German passport to build a German-style luxury car, drawing well-heeled buyers away from BMW, Mercedes and Jaguar by offering what those brands never could: Corolla-levels of reliability in a plush package.

Time, however, has caught up with the flagship. Sales have dwindled, with just 691 units sold in the first half of 2025, a sharp 42.3 percent drop compared with the year before and even more dramatic when measured against earlier years. With that, Lexus is preparing to retire the LS in the United States and other markets. Before bowing out, though, it is giving its luxury pioneer a send-off with a limited-run special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Dequindre said:

This is crazy to think about. It has been Lexus' flagship since the very beginning. 

 

I agree you'd think they would keep it around even for lower numbers as a halo of sorts.  It was their first model.  Really surprised to see them give up on it even with a shrinking market. 

 

What does this leave for large luxury sedans?  S-Class, 7 Series, A8, Genesis G90, is that it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2025 at 11:07 PM, twintornados said:

But several here want Ford to build a large Lincoln sedan....market sez, "No thanks."


I’ve advocated for a larger midsize.  There’s still some volume there, and lets the brand and dealers have a sedan offering covering that chunk of the market without jumping into the shrinking full size market that has long-established players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, rmc523 said:


I’ve advocated for a larger midsize.  There’s still some volume there, and lets the brand and dealers have a sedan offering covering that chunk of the market without jumping into the shrinking full size market that has long-established players.

 

Toyota was a long established player in the full size market and they just folded up their offering that was top shelf in said market and walked away from it...that is a telling sign about the viability of that market. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, twintornados said:

 

Toyota was a long established player in the full size market and they just folded up their offering that was top shelf in said market and walked away from it...that is a telling sign about the viability of that market. 

 

....which is why I suggested a midsize....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, rmc523 said:

 

....which is why I suggested a midsize....

 

Your suggestion was for a "larger midsize" which describes a "full size" car...or am I missing something. I will say, when I took a Crown for a test drive, I was underwhelmed by the distinct lack of space inside the car....it just felt cramped....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, twintornados said:

 

Your suggestion was for a "larger midsize" which describes a "full size" car...or am I missing something. I will say, when I took a Crown for a test drive, I was underwhelmed by the distinct lack of space inside the car....it just felt cramped....

 The last Lincoln Continental could be considered a large mid-size.   It was similar in size to my BMW 5 series but had a lot more room, especially in the rear seats.   I don't think anyone would consider it cramped.   It was a comfortable sedan with some nice features but basically a bland vehicle that didn't reach the standards of a real luxury car.    I do not claim to know if there is a reasonably sized market for a luxury sedan in that size category, anymore.    People still have choices with the German nameplates as well as the Lexus ES and Genesis.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, twintornados said:

 

Your suggestion was for a "larger midsize" which describes a "full size" car...or am I missing something. I will say, when I took a Crown for a test drive, I was underwhelmed by the distinct lack of space inside the car....it just felt cramped....


Pretty sure he means something like Avalon or new Accord which is at the top end of midsizers but still smaller than a crown Vic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, twintornados said:

 

Your suggestion was for a "larger midsize" which describes a "full size" car...or am I missing something. I will say, when I took a Crown for a test drive, I was underwhelmed by the distinct lack of space inside the car....it just felt cramped....

 

If I had meant "full size", I'd have said full size....

 

I'm saying something that's not the size of an S-class, 7 series, etc, but not small either and with plenty of room inside.  Hence, larger midsize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, brucelinc said:

 The last Lincoln Continental could be considered a large mid-size.   It was similar in size to my BMW 5 series but had a lot more room, especially in the rear seats.  

2017-2020 Continental was considered "full size" according to Wikipedia 

 

3 hours ago, akirby said:

Pretty sure he means something like Avalon or new Accord which is at the top end of midsizers but still smaller than a crown Vic.

Toyota Avalon was also considered "full size" according to Wikipedia..Accord is listed as "mid size"

 

26 minutes ago, rmc523 said:

 

If I had meant "full size", I'd have said full size....

 

I'm saying something that's not the size of an S-class, 7 series, etc, but not small either and with plenty of room inside.  Hence, larger midsize.

 

I get what you are saying and we actually agree...but, gotta watch those dimensions...some examples used in this discussion thread are considered "full size" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, twintornados said:

2017-2020 Continental was considered "full size" according to Wikipedia 

 

Toyota Avalon was also considered "full size" according to Wikipedia..Accord is listed as "mid size"

 

 

I get what you are saying and we actually agree...but, gotta watch those dimensions...some examples used in this discussion thread are considered "full size" 


Larger midsize/smaller full size as opposed to a Crown Vic or Town car which were humongous by comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, twintornados said:

2017-2020 Continental was considered "full size" according to Wikipedia 

 

Toyota Avalon was also considered "full size" according to Wikipedia..Accord is listed as "mid size"

 

 

I get what you are saying and we actually agree...but, gotta watch those dimensions...some examples used in this discussion thread are considered "full size" 

 

Yup, clearly the market falls off a cliff at those larger sedans, and whatever sales are out there are already covered by long-running models (exception being Genesis that apparently has money to do whatever segments they want) - no need to try to siphon off a few hundred/thousand sales in that segment unless they just had oodles of money to spend on product.

Offering a larger midsize allows them to target a broader swath of what's left of the luxury sedan market without being too large or expensive.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...