We Gave Maverick a Mustang Turbo Transplant — You're Going to Love It

[Sherminator98]

https://www.fromtheroad.ford.com/us/en/articles/2025/maverick-300T-mustang-turbo-transplant

 

Quote

At SEMA 2025, we're showcasing a Ford Custom Garage Project Vehicle, courtesy of Ford Performance Parts — the Ford Maverick 300T. And we plan to make a version of the 300T project kit available to customers in 2026. Stay tuned.

 

[akirby]

No brainer.  

[twintornados]

I sure hope they beefed up the front CV axles.....(wink-wink)

[sullynd]

2 hours ago, twintornados said:

I sure hope they beefed up the front CV axles.....(wink-wink)

I’ve seen a number of people swapping out to the Tremor CVs. 

[ZanatWork]

I've been watching a ton of Maverick and Bronco Sport reviews, partially because I have YouTube as background noise when I'm doing other things.

The calls for a real upgrade (beyond the Ecoboost 4 that's seemingly had the same output since the Earth cooled) and a manual option in both have been constant.

While I know that those markets are limited, I'd like Ford to capitalize with some limited-edition models more than I'd want "aftermarket tuner X" to basically profit from re-packaging Ford's hardware. So, come on Ford...lean in on the "no boring vehicles" pledge, and give the gearheads some love...!

[DeluxeStang]

3 hours ago, twintornados said:

I sure hope they beefed up the front CV axles.....(wink-wink)

I swear, I'm gonna get PTSD just from hearing someone mention CV axles in the future. I'm at 17k miles so mine will probably be failing any minute now. 

[rmc523]

28 minutes ago, ZanatWork said:

I've been watching a ton of Maverick and Bronco Sport reviews, partially because I have YouTube as background noise when I'm doing other things.

The calls for a real upgrade (beyond the Ecoboost 4 that's seemingly had the same output since the Earth cooled) and a manual option in both have been constant.

While I know that those markets are limited, I'd like Ford to capitalize with some limited-edition models more than I'd want "aftermarket tuner X" to basically profit from re-packaging Ford's hardware. So, come on Ford...lean in on the "no boring vehicles" pledge, and give the gearheads some love...!

 

Lobo R?

[Sherminator98]

48 minutes ago, ZanatWork said:

The calls for a real upgrade (beyond the Ecoboost 4 that's seemingly had the same output since the Earth cooled) and a manual option in both have been constant.

While I know that those markets are limited, I'd like Ford to capitalize with some limited-edition models more than I'd want "aftermarket tuner X" to basically profit from re-packaging Ford's hardware. So, come on Ford...lean in on the "no boring vehicles" pledge, and give the gearheads some love...!

 

I'm guessing the real reason they haven't done a manual is two fold-finding something that standup to the torque ratings and the recertification for emissions and CAFE...

and anstromincally small take rate. 

 

Sometimes the squeakiest of wheels online are just a non factor when it converting over to actual sales. 

[twintornados]

1 hour ago, DeluxeStang said:

I swear, I'm gonna get PTSD just from hearing someone mention CV axles in the future. I'm at 17k miles so mine will probably be failing any minute now. 

 

Well, if you believe what some over at Maverick Truck Club dot.com are saying....they are failing as soon as they leave the factory or while on the train ride across the boarder.....lol

[DeluxeStang]

1 hour ago, rmc523 said:

 

Lobo R?

Would the R stand for race or recall?

[HotRunrGuy]

3 hours ago, sullynd said:

I’ve seen a number of people swapping out to the Tremor CVs. 

 

I swapped mine out by trading for an actual Tremor, but yes, that seems to be the answer for the 22-24 2.0EB crowd. The Hybrid folks are on their own,,,,,,

 

Have not heard of anyone with a '25 having CV problems, so Ford probably upgraded those components.

 

HRG

[DeluxeStang]

6 minutes ago, HotRunrGuy said:

 

I swapped mine out by trading for an actual Tremor, but yes, that seems to be the answer for the 22-24 2.0EB crowd. The Hybrid folks are on their own,,,,,,

 

Have not heard of anyone with a '25 having CV problems, so Ford probably upgraded those components.

 

HRG

It's rumored Ford modified the tremor CVs to somehow bolt into the hybrid. That's the theory at least. The '25 versions look pretty close to the tremors and are a lot beefier. It's now the go to part for older mavericks if they need their CVs replaced, they just swap in the better ones. 

[akirby]

I would not be shocked to see this in a factory package or at least as a dealer installed package next year.

[Rick73]

Turbo Maverick is already considerably faster than Hybrid, yet over 50% of buyers prefer Hybrid in spite of having less power.  And yes, I obviously know hybrid buyers may be purchasing for greater fuel economy, not because they don’t want more power.  However, IMO buyers’ preference for much higher HP and Torque is often exaggerated.  I doubt adding extra 50 HP and 40 lb-ft will affect sales all that much, but may adversely affect reliability, durability and warranty costs if made part of an OEM package.  I personally think 250 HP is plenty for a Maverick-size ICE truck.  I’d make 300 HP an aftermarket option.  Just my subjective 2 cents.

[T-dubz]

I wonder how many of these custom garage packages are actually sold. I see this and think it’s cool, then see it’s from the custom garage and instantly lose interest. Sign me up if it’s from the factory though.

[akirby]

5 minutes ago, T-dubz said:

I wonder how many of these custom garage packages are actually sold. I see this and think it’s cool, then see it’s from the custom garage and instantly lose interest. Sign me up if it’s from the factory though.

But custom garage IS Ford…..

[T-dubz]

7 hours ago, akirby said:

But custom garage IS Ford…..

No one said it wasn’t. People are much more likely to purchase something if it comes from the factory instead of a dealer installed option that costs thousands of dollars. If this 300T was an additional trim, it would probably sell pretty well, but I have to believe being a custom garage item will limit its popularity.

[Sherminator98]

6 hours ago, T-dubz said:

No one said it wasn’t. People are much more likely to purchase something if it comes from the factory instead of a dealer installed option that costs thousands of dollars. If this 300T was an additional trim, it would probably sell pretty well, but I have to believe being a custom garage item will limit its popularity.

I'd say it depends-you might have dealerships doing the conversion themselves to incoming product to make more money off the Maverick. 

[Sherminator98]

15 hours ago, Rick73 said:

Turbo Maverick is already considerably faster than Hybrid, yet over 50% of buyers prefer Hybrid in spite of having less power.  And yes, I obviously know hybrid buyers may be purchasing for greater fuel economy, not because they don’t want more power.  However, IMO buyers’ preference for much higher HP and Torque is often exaggerated.  I doubt adding extra 50 HP and 40 lb-ft will affect sales all that much, but may adversely affect reliability, durability and warranty costs if made part of an OEM package.  I personally think 250 HP is plenty for a Maverick-size ICE truck.  I’d make 300 HP an aftermarket option.  Just my subjective 2 cents.

 

The changes are pretty minor and are already in other products...if this is offered in an OEM package from the factory, I'd say that the extra money they can charge for it will def outweigh the small additional costs. The higher trim models (Lobo, Lariat and Tremor) already 5-10K more then the entry level models..this would command another $3-5K on top of those prices.

 

As for the hybrid thing-is that because Ford is producing more hybrids for models on the lots? The hybrid as of 2026 costs more then 2.0L ecoboost models in the same trim levels. 

 

 

[akirby]

7 hours ago, T-dubz said:

No one said it wasn’t. People are much more likely to purchase something if it comes from the factory instead of a dealer installed option that costs thousands of dollars. If this 300T was an additional trim, it would probably sell pretty well, but I have to believe being a custom garage item will limit its popularity.

I get your point but I also think you’re underestimating how much Maverick owners like to customize their trucks. 

[rmc523]

18 hours ago, akirby said:

I would not be shocked to see this in a factory package or at least as a dealer installed package next year.

 

Ford Maverick 300T Project Kit Should Arrive In 2026

According to Matthew Simpson, Ford's Executive Director of Accessories and Personalization, the Ford Maverick 300T project kit will be "available to customers in 2026." This is obviously good news for Maverick owners that want a bit more sportiness from their compact pickups, not to mention more power than the Lobo offers as well.

 

17 hours ago, Rick73 said:

Turbo Maverick is already considerably faster than Hybrid, yet over 50% of buyers prefer Hybrid in spite of having less power.  And yes, I obviously know hybrid buyers may be purchasing for greater fuel economy, not because they don’t want more power.  However, IMO buyers’ preference for much higher HP and Torque is often exaggerated.  I doubt adding extra 50 HP and 40 lb-ft will affect sales all that much, but may adversely affect reliability, durability and warranty costs if made part of an OEM package.  I personally think 250 HP is plenty for a Maverick-size ICE truck.  I’d make 300 HP an aftermarket option.  Just my subjective 2 cents.

 

Depends on the segment.  You have a lot of Maverick buyers that come from regular sedans, so they want more fuel economy.  But on the flip side, there are other folks that want more power too.

[Rick73]

2 hours ago, Sherminator98 said:

 

The changes are pretty minor and are already in other products...if this is offered in an OEM package from the factory, I'd say that the extra money they can charge for it will def outweigh the small additional costs. The higher trim models (Lobo, Lariat and Tremor) already 5-10K more then the entry level models..this would command another $3-5K on top of those prices.

 

As for the hybrid thing-is that because Ford is producing more hybrids for models on the lots? The hybrid as of 2026 costs more then 2.0L ecoboost models in the same trim levels. 

 

 

I don’t see it as a minor change at all.  Increasing boost pressure to get 150 HP per liter in a truck that “may” be used for towing raises a lot of questions.  Is it covered 100% under warranty?  If not, how many owners will likely take risk of voiding coverage.  And if Ford offers full warranty because they feel it’s “bulletproof” then I think warranty costs will go up significantly.  Granted it’s meant to be a street truck but will Ford limit some guy from towing a 4,000-pound trailer uphill at stupid speeds made possible by 300 HP?

 

Honestly, I’d have to know a lot more details than what has been disclosed here.  On the surface selling it as an additional trim or factory option with full factory warranty sounds like a bad idea.  Maverick is first and foremost a truck and not a sports car, and some owners may want to use its capabilities accordingly so doesn’t seem a minor change to me.  Regardless, it’s adding significant stress to vehicle components.
 

 

Quote

The Details

The Maverick 300T Project Vehicle is designed for the 2025 Maverick XL, XLT, and Lariat models equipped with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost engine and all-wheel drive. Although it can be fitted without, we would recommend the 4K tow package that provides extra cooling for the transmission.

 

[Rick73]

39 minutes ago, rmc523 said:

Depends on the segment.  You have a lot of Maverick buyers that come from regular sedans, so they want more fuel economy.  But on the flip side, there are other folks that want more power too.

I get that people want all kinds of things but that doesn’t mean it’s always a good idea to give it to them.  What if they ask for 400 HP next?  Obviously Ford thinks 300 HP must be viable, but on flip side I don’t always agree with their judgement. 😀

[rmc523]

1 hour ago, Rick73 said:

I get that people want all kinds of things but that doesn’t mean it’s always a good idea to give it to them.  What if they ask for 400 HP next?  Obviously Ford thinks 300 HP must be viable, but on flip side I don’t always agree with their judgement. 😀

 

Not everyone wants a shoebox/econobox.  If Ford can make money offering both, why not?

[blazerdude20]

22 hours ago, Rick73 said:

Turbo Maverick is already considerably faster than Hybrid, yet over 50% of buyers prefer Hybrid in spite of having less power.  And yes, I obviously know hybrid buyers may be purchasing for greater fuel economy, not because they don’t want more power.  However, IMO buyers’ preference for much higher HP and Torque is often exaggerated.  I doubt adding extra 50 HP and 40 lb-ft will affect sales all that much, but may adversely affect reliability, durability and warranty costs if made part of an OEM package.  I personally think 250 HP is plenty for a Maverick-size ICE truck.  I’d make 300 HP an aftermarket option.  Just my subjective 2 cents.

I agree generally that desire for power from the general public is overstated, especially if it costs a decent amount more.  But, I think a lot more people want their vehicle to give the appearance of being super capable in the sporty or rugged realms. If you can build a package that is a little quicker but looks more aggressive, you can definitely build in a higher retail price. That’s where an ST comes in. 
 

Almost no one is tracking an Explorer ST, but they sell a bunch of them. I’d bet there is a decent market for a Maverick ST.