Jump to content

Rivian R2 enters final validation testing, spotted uncamouflaged on streets


Sherminator98

Recommended Posts

Given how volatile Rivian stock is, In expecting it to drop this week as we near their quarterly earnings, it almost always does. But after that, I'm buying in an holding until the r2 release in June. I genuinely believe this company is setting itself up to be successful long term. 

 

They're doing everything right Tesla did, with the added benefits of having a more enticing design language, avoiding all the controversy, and receiving billions in funding from external sources like Amazon and VW. I wouldn't be surprised if the share price was $50 a share in a few years time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeluxeStang said:

Given how volatile Rivian stock is, In expecting it to drop this week as we near their quarterly earnings, it almost always does. But after that, I'm buying in an holding until the r2 release in June. I genuinely believe this company is setting itself up to be successful long term. 

 

They're doing everything right Tesla did, with the added benefits of having a more enticing design language, avoiding all the controversy, and receiving billions in funding from external sources like Amazon and VW. I wouldn't be surprised if the share price was $50 a share in a few years time. 

 

Sadly, I bought 10 Rivian shares early on, hoping they'd be another Tesla stock, only for it to drop to its current levels lol.  I'm waiting....and waiting....and waiting....lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeluxeStang said:

Given how volatile Rivian stock is, In expecting it to drop this week as we near their quarterly earnings, it almost always does. But after that, I'm buying in an holding until the r2 release in June. I genuinely believe this company is setting itself up to be successful long term. 

 

They're doing everything right Tesla did, with the added benefits of having a more enticing design language, avoiding all the controversy, and receiving billions in funding from external sources like Amazon and VW. I wouldn't be surprised if the share price was $50 a share in a few years time. 


its Hillarious that Ford Wrote off their investment in Rivian in 2023

Ford sells majority stake in Rivian after reporting $7.3B write-down | TechCrunch

image.png.c8e57025de2ec0a000466ec71b9084b9.png

This is so Ford.... they can never stick to a plan.
image.png.d9294d4f70c3f729f8de77ba1f07c483.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Biker16 said:


It'd be funny if Rivian R3 beat Ford's low-cost models to market.
 

 

The CE1 truck will be closer in size to the R1 pickup anyways.

 

The R2 is roughly the same length as the Escape, so if anything the CE1 CUV will be roughly the same size as the R2 and be about 10-15K cheaper in starting price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Sherminator98 said:

 

The CE1 truck will be closer in size to the R1 pickup anyways.

 

The R2 is roughly the same length as the Escape, so if anything the CE1 CUV will be roughly the same size as the R2 and be about 10-15K cheaper in starting price. 

 
We'll See 🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Biker16 said:


It'd be funny if Rivian R3 beat Ford's low-cost models to market.
 

 

Ah yes, the vehicle that they debuted in March 2024 could possibly go on sale before a vehicle that hasn't even debuted yet......     Hilarious and shocking/unexpected!!!!!

Edited by rmc523
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/10/2026 at 8:36 PM, akirby said:


They didn't do enough due diligence before entering the relationship.  

 Let's imagine that Ford kept their investment in Rivian. How would that have changed the trajectory of Ford EVs?

2022- Ford Posts Loss as It Takes $2.7 Billion Charge on Argo Driverless Venture - WSJ

2025- Ford scraps key software program after $10 billion in losses
2026- Ford retreats from EVs, takes $19.5 billion charge as Trump policies grip industry

2026 - Ford Admits Its EV Division Will Keep Burning Billions For Years | Carscoops

That's $40-44 billion in Losses. I don't think due diligence is the problem

IMO, Ford would have been better off acquiring Technology through acquisitions rather than building it in-house. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Biker16 said:

 Let's imagine that Ford kept their investment in Rivian. How would that have changed the trajectory of Ford EVs?

2022- Ford Posts Loss as It Takes $2.7 Billion Charge on Argo Driverless Venture - WSJ

2025- Ford scraps key software program after $10 billion in losses
2026- Ford retreats from EVs, takes $19.5 billion charge as Trump policies grip industry

2026 - Ford Admits Its EV Division Will Keep Burning Billions For Years | Carscoops

That's $40-44 billion in Losses. I don't think due diligence is the problem

IMO, Ford would have been better off acquiring Technology through acquisitions rather than building it in-house. 


All it would have given them is a large Ford and Lincoln crossover.  Nothing that would compete with CE1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, akirby said:


All it would have given them is a large Ford and Lincoln crossover.  Nothing that would compete with CE1.

 
and a working zonal Software Architecture, and an established Battery supply, and Advanced Motors.  All designed and sourced in the USA
How Rivian Developed Its Zonal Architecture In Just Two Years

EV profitability is about scale; without it, you can't bring costs down. 

Edited by Biker16
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Biker16 said:

 
and a working zonal Software Architecture, and an established Battery supply, and Advanced Motors.  All designed and sourced in the USA
How Rivian Developed Its Zonal Architecture In Just Two Years

EV profitability is about scale; without it, you can't bring costs down. 


There is no indication that system is cheaper or better than CE1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Biker16 said:

 
and a working zonal Software Architecture, and an established Battery supply, and Advanced Motors.  All designed and sourced in the USA
How Rivian Developed Its Zonal Architecture In Just Two Years

EV profitability is about scale; without it, you can't bring costs down. 

 

The issue was reportedly that Rivian's systems didn't talk with Ford's systems.  So you're having something completely standalone in relation to all other Ford products......you're just buying something and having to develop those products completely independently from Ford models that eliminates any economies of scale from other Ford products.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akirby said:


There is no indication that system is cheaper or better than CE1.  


This is true; we don't know what CE1 has. 
 

 

37 minutes ago, rmc523 said:

 

The issue was reportedly that Rivian's systems didn't talk with Ford's systems.  So you're having something completely standalone in relation to all other Ford products......you're just buying something and having to develop those products completely independently from Ford models that eliminates any economies of scale from other Ford products.


There will be tension between what works today and what works in the future. Using VW's experience with integrating two separate Zonal Architectures after their in-house architecture failed. They had to start from a clean sheet and couldn't use their current systems. At the time, Ford wasn't willing to do that; they seem to have a change of heart with CE1.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2026 at 3:32 PM, Biker16 said:

There will be tension between what works today and what works in the future. Using VW's experience with integrating two separate Zonal Architectures after their in-house architecture failed. They had to start from a clean sheet and couldn't use their current systems. At the time, Ford wasn't willing to do that; they seem to have a change of heart with CE1.

 

VW IMO was in worst shape for future EV development then Ford due to being "too big to fail" and it hurting from dieselgate.

 

Their hand was forced to work with Rivian. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sherminator98 said:

 

VW IMO was in worst shape for future EV development then Ford due to being "too big to fail" and it hurting from dieselgate.

 

Their hand was forced to work with Rivian. 


I don't think so. You could say VW was more exposed due their Reliance on China and Europe for volume. I also think that VW being the first legacy automaker to bring a dedicated EV platform to market hurt them, in the Medium term with numerous Software issues, and Inflexible battery architecture.  

The hardware issues are being resolved this year with the Debut of the Rivian-based Zonal software package in 2027 or 2028. 

Ford, on the other hand, outsourced its EV development in Europe to VW and leaned heavily on suppliers like BorgWarner in its early EVs. Software-wise, I don't have a good understanding of where Ford Stands with Zonal Architectures. I do know they cancelled their First effort last year.

Edited by Biker16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...