Jump to content

2029 Ford Mustang Mach-4 Sedan: Everything We Know About the Next Member of the Mustang Family


Recommended Posts

Thanks everyone,

I have enough just enough in retirement fund and some cash to make it work (not rich by any means)

Funny thing is my employer is open to casual 40 hours a fortnight but I dunno, would pay for a nice 347…

It was pointed out to me that every extra year you work in your 60s is one less golden year in retirement.

 

Edited by jpd80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jpd80 said:

Thanks everyone,

I have enough just enough in retirement fund and some cash to make it work (not rich by any means)

Funny thing is my employer is open to casual 40 hours a fortnight but I dunno, would pay for a nice 347…

It was pointed out to me that every extra year you work in your 60s is one less golden year in retirement.

 

For my last 6 months of working, I negotiated a 3-day work week (Tues/Wed/Thurs) so every weekend was a 4-day. I felt it was an easy way to ease into the new schedule. Either way, Happy Retirement!

 

HRG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HotRunrGuy said:

For my last 6 months of working, I negotiated a 3-day work week (Tues/Wed/Thurs) so every weekend was a 4-day. I felt it was an easy way to ease into the new schedule. Either way, Happy Retirement!

 

HRG

Cheers HRG, I hear you, keeping my options open for now.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jpd80 said:

It was pointed out to me that every extra year you work in your 60s is one less golden year in retirement.

Exactly. I worked for IBM for 31.5 years but I could have retired at 30 years with the same exact benefits. There was no reason to work that extra 18 months other than being unsure about taking that leap. In hindsight, I very much regret working longer than needed. I would like to have those 18 months back!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Texasota said:

Exactly. I worked for IBM for 31.5 years but I could have retired at 30 years with the same exact benefits. There was no reason to work that extra 18 months other than being unsure about taking that leap. In hindsight, I very much regret working longer than needed. I would like to have those 18 months back!


At AT&T several years ago we had a guy who planned to retire at the end of the year (with subsidized health care).  We had a voluntary surplus offer in June which came with 6 months pay (for him).  He decided not to take it and instead worked until Dec. 31st then retired.   Tried to explain that he was basically working for free at that point but he couldn't grasp the finances.  Just said he wasn't quite ready.   Maybe his wife didn't want him home with her.......

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akirby said:


At AT&T several years ago we had a guy who planned to retire at the end of the year (with subsidized health care).  We had a voluntary surplus offer in June which came with 6 months pay (for him).  He decided not to take it and instead worked until Dec. 31st then retired.   Tried to explain that he was basically working for free at that point but he couldn't grasp the finances.  Just said he wasn't quite ready.   Maybe his wife didn't want him home with her.......

Hey I work for AT&T too, 29 years, and I’ll retire in Sept as my job “moved”, so getting the severance package. Not my preference to stop working with them but I’ll make the most of it, see what becomes!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, spudz64 said:

Hey I work for AT&T too, 29 years, and I’ll retire in Sept as my job “moved”, so getting the severance package. Not my preference to stop working with them but I’ll make the most of it, see what becomes!

I feel your angst, my chiefs called me into the office and wanted a retirement date.

I took that as my opportunity to name the date, so I timed it for planned office shutdown

right before Christmas - it’s like 6 months longer than originally planned but

everyone is happy including me.

Edited by jpd80
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2026 at 2:46 AM, jpd80 said:

Retiring at the end of the year, I have a ‘91 Fairmont 5.0 in the shed with fresh engine

think RWD V8 that looks like a Taurus…

 

image.jpeg.8803e8b01c8015fe317a28110c25cab4.jpeg

Congratulations on your upcoming retirement. I wish you all the best!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’re welcome and thanks as well and it’s nice to read your posts as well. All is good here at OAC, we're currently very very slowly moving closer to Job 1. We are currently at pre MP1 phase.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2026 at 11:46 PM, jpd80 said:

Retiring at the end of the year, I have a ‘91 Fairmont 5.0 in the shed with fresh engine

think RWD V8 that looks like a Taurus…

 

image.jpeg.8803e8b01c8015fe317a28110c25cab4.jpeg

 

wow, my dad had an EA II Fairmont. but not V8 obviously... that didn't come until EB. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the 4-door Thunderbird, there should never be a 4-door Mustang! If you want to stretch the Mustang platform, fine. Just change the sheet metal and call it something else! Or give it to the Lincoln stable. How about the Lincoln Capri? My uncle had a 1953-ish one which was the same as my father's Ford Crestline. Of course Mercury used the Capri name a while back. Don't tarnish the Mustang legacy with a 4-door! Okay, now somebody's going to blast me!  Who will it be?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Joe771476 said:

Like the 4-door Thunderbird, there should never be a 4-door Mustang! If you want to stretch the Mustang platform, fine. Just change the sheet metal and call it something else! Or give it to the Lincoln stable. How about the Lincoln Capri? My uncle had a 1953-ish one which was the same as my father's Ford Crestline. Of course Mercury used the Capri name a while back. Don't tarnish the Mustang legacy with a 4-door! Okay, now somebody's going to blast me!  Who will it be?

The Horror!!!

image.thumb.png.b1b5f65c273a2ab254b7e5d8dc58d6ea.png

 

The only reason why they did not built it was that it would step on the toes of the Falcon too much. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bzcat said:

 

wow, my dad had an EA II Fairmont. but not V8 obviously... that didn't come until EB. 

 

This one is early EB1 with no smart lock so must be early build 91 plate

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ausrutherford said:

The Horror!!!

image.thumb.png.b1b5f65c273a2ab254b7e5d8dc58d6ea.png

 

The only reason why they did not built it was that it would step on the toes of the Falcon too much. 

Not to mention Ford made mustang wagon and mid-engine concepts as well. This confirms Ford was thinking of a mustang sub-brand basically since the begining. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...