Jump to content

Marginal Economist

Member
  • Posts

    960
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Marginal Economist

  1. 1400 jobs seems like a PR move. There are 1400 people who have between 30-35 years at the company that are thrilled to be getting a bonus to go home. Morale is low - we made $10.2B - 2nd best profit # ever - and got 76% of our target bonus. Ford hires a 35 year old Chief Brand officer and his signature move so far is to cut camo from our apparel offerings. The best way to get a promotion at Ford is to go work for Nissan for two years.

     

    Silver lining is that as the early retirement packages are taken, those jobs will open up. There may be some jobs or positions that are eliminated, but Ford is running thinner and expanding into more categories. They are growing their analytics team and the folks in Palo Alto. The are trying to grow connected car and mobility services. They just launched Omnicraft.

     

    If they can replace a guy making $150K with an FCG making $60K and without future pension obligations, it may make sense. But you are also losing a lot of talent when the people hired since 2003 have no pension and no reason to stay at Ford.

  2. once again your WRONG, focus is not so hi volume(aka laying a shift off) and really not that profitable till you go overseas

    the ranger/bronco/etc will be a platform on its own, its much better then the way u make it out to be

     

    Focus is a 200K-250K year vehicle. Ranger is likely looking at 50K. Market segment is still way down and many Ranger buyers went to F150 or the competition.

  3. I thought Ford was going to concentrate on cars, not trucks and these big SUV behemoths. Looks like they are going for the big profits again and letting quality slip (recall #7 on the Escape).

     

    Alan is on the same message everytime and has been for at least the last 5 years - full portfolio of cars, trucks, and utilities - small medium and large. I've heard him say this at least 15 times.

     

    July 31, 2013 -

    Alan: Oh, well, absolutely. Well, clearly, our plan around the world, Ford's plan is to offer our customers in every market segment around the world a complete family of vehicles, so small, and medium, and large; and cars, utilities, and trucks; all the way from the Fiesta all the way up, of course, to the popular F series

     

    January 15, 2008 -

    Arguably the finest truck, large-SUV company in the world, and the transformation now is to take that solid fundamental and compliment that with some more exciting fuel efficient, smaller vehicles, and provide a full family of cars, utilities and trucks for the traveling motorist.

     

    July 18, 2011 -

    We decided to have a complete family of vehicles worldwide available to the consumers: small, medium and large cars, utilities and trucks.
  4. well, if you make approximately $28.00/hr and the union takes 2 hours of pay per month, that is $56.00 per month. A 1/3 of one percent increase would be less than 20 cents...

     

    2 hours/174 hours work month. Currently 1.15%. Add in the 1/3 of a percent and it is now 1.48% or 2.58 hours per month. In dollars, this would equate to another $16 and change per month.

     

    This is how I would guess they would calculate it - I've not seen a formula. I don't think they would go through the motions for less than 20 cents.

  5. According to the Oasis, do you know when it was bought back? I know there is paperwork the 2nd owner needs to sign for lemon law disclosure, but after that I have no idea what the disclosure requirements would be. As a 2008 Shelby, it is likely that the car was lemon lawed by 2010 at the latest and you are at least the third owner. Best of luck - any Ford store should have run an Oasis during their recon process. I'm not sure if there is legal recourse.

  6. I don't want to turn this into a lease vs buy forum, but I don't think buying makes sense for me. After years of owning vehicles for 5-7 years, I would want to update much sooner now. And say I purchased as the poster suggested above. It is still 700ish a month out of my pocket and would I get 30k back on a trade-in or even selling a 2 year old MKZ on the market myself (even if I wanted the hassle)? A quick look at asking prices on Cars.com on 2 year old MKZs says maybe not... And this doesn't factor in the maintenace costs of years 2-5ish of ownership...

    My original point was supposed to be that the Lincoln lease seems very high, higher than cars that cost much more. By pure msrp I always thought (and still do) that the MKZ is a bargain for its features. There were other vehicles I had ruled out since their prices were thousands more, but given different leasing pricing maybe I shouldn't have done so... I really DO like the MKZ, I just thought I'd be looking at high 500s to low 600s for leases, NOT the same amount as if I purchased... Again, I have yet to have a dealer tackle this issue. This is all the configurator...

    Regarding the Q50h as pointed out above, I am going to look at it since actually the closest dealer

    in my commute to work is actually an excellent Infiniti outfit. That said, while on paper it seems perfect, there is just something about Infiniti in their design that feels even less premium than Lincoln. You could slap a Kia or Mazda badge on anything they do and not question it. I sat for a long time in the Q50 at an auto show rrcently, and felt its interior was a giant step back from their current motif. Their current M interior feels faaaarrr more upscale than the Q50. That said, its not hard to believe it's a better driver. That's never been their problem, although several recent reviews have suggested driving dynamics may have suffered in this redo. Their models, in part due to aggressive lease deals, have depreciation on par or perhaps worse than Lincoln. If you are serious about getting one, I would seriously think about waiting two years. I am...

    I have also long justified a string of Acuras, mb, bmws, and now Saab ownership that when the domestics were there product wise they would get my money. Well I think that day is here and it's time for me to put my money where my mouth is.

     

    I would guess the configuration is incorrect. I have seen leases advertised at 400 month with 3500 down. I would guess you could be under 550 with a pretty well equipped MKZ and zero out of pocket.

  7. I think this will be a non event. I do not see stores ordering these trim levels and talking to customers about them. Maybe there will be a 5% take rate and Lincoln will sell 200-300 month nationally. I do not know that the incremental revenue will justify the increased order complexity and the potential for higher days on the lot. How many Lincoln stores are currently selling more than 20 a month?

     

    I guess the key factor will be the price tag and how much better the packages look.

×
×
  • Create New...