Jump to content

GearheadGrrrl

Member
  • Posts

    685
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by GearheadGrrrl

  1. 37 minutes ago, rperez817 said:

     

    This is an area where mass adoption of BEV with V2G capability, such as Ford F-150 Lightning, can promote grid resiliency. Additionally, growth in the installation of non BEV energy storage systems to support grid resiliency has picked up dramatically in recent years. In fact, the heatwaves in Texas (my home state) and California this summer demonstrated the value of these systems. Surprising energy source takes sector by storm after saving heat-battered states this summer: 'On pace for a record year' (thecooldown.com)

    Nice theory, but in practice... 

     

    Our towns utility wishes we would go away, 'cause then they wouldn't have to maintain a 20+ mile long line that serves only a couple hundred users. If I put up rooftop solar they'll grudgingly accept its 'cause they have too, but no way will they allow significant inputs on their system here. As for EVs as storage to compensate for the sad state of the "grid", with the unreliability of power here we're not about to share the power of our charged batteries when the power may go out for days!

  2. 53 minutes ago, LSchicago said:

     

    Shouldn't be that big of a deal. But necessary to roll with the changes. I'm sure they will install Solar/wind power at most stations getting the upgrades to up their profit margins. Can't make nearly as much money if you have to buy the power. It's a long term investment, but it will pay off. 

    Land around gas stations is too expensive for solar or wind, so beyond a few solar panels on the roof to virtue signal it won't happen.

  3. 14 hours ago, silvrsvt said:

     

    But we had the talk about Synthetic gas also-there is absolutely no way that they can scale it up to completely replace what gasoline is now. Yeah its a great idea to keep your 2020 Mustang topped off in 2070 or something...but its not going to fix the issue.

     

    EVs are the least worst solution for reducing CO2 emissions out of all the options and pretty much anything else all it is good for is to create noise to keep people from using it. 

     

    The two biggest issues are charging, which will improve as time goes on and range, which will be less of an issue if you can charge almost anywhere. If you can charge up in 10-20 minutes from say 1% to 80% the problem is pretty much a non issue. The other problem is just mindset-I know lots of people feel the need to keep their cars filled all the time, but if you can plug in almost anywhere-does it really matter? 

     

     

    But the reality is that electric propulsion will not work for all users.

     

    For those of us that live in rural areas or apartments or have heavy stuff to haul renewable fuels make much more sense than electrification. And while even in the U.S. we currently can't produce enough biomass to meet all of our liquid fuel needs, we can cover at least 30% of them and more with current technology. And for the small town gas stations out here that can't even afford to pave their premises, instead of million dollar investments in charging stations renewable fuels can use much of the current gas and diesel infrastructure.

     

    Why change your whole vehicle when you just need to change fuels?

  4. 43 minutes ago, silvrsvt said:

     

     

    Next time don't let  your bias get in the way of facts
     

     

     

    Yet again-the "major losses" that the Lightning and Mach E are carrying are due to the way Model E accounting is reported. Lets see what the deal is when BOC and the battery plants that are causing these "huge" loses actually start producing product.

    My bias is in favor of electric cars, problem is how to transition to EVs ASAP without bankrupting everyone involved.

     

    If Ford can keep those plants running at capacity when they come online and for the next few decades, no problem. But can the market absorb all the batteries and EVs the industry is tooling up to build? Will customers buy enough RVs to keep those plants running at capacity? If not, it may be Ford's turn to visit bankruptcy court.

  5. Most of the reasons the full size pickups series are pretty much a North American market oddity is because Rest Of World's garages can't fit them. America with it's millions of huge homes built after WW2 with huge garages could easily house full size pickups, but new housing in NA is now trending to smaller garages, driveways, and just plain apartments. Might explain why the Maverick sells so well...

     

    As for the economics, having lived within my means with 40+ MPG cars I'm now comfortably retired and could buy an F150 or three cash, but why waste my garage on three trucks when I can fit four sports cars!

    • Like 1
  6. The only advantage I can see is cost- one less cylinder head, one less set of cams. etc.. With the difficulty of packaging an inline 6 in transverse applications and the V6s left to die, it would doom Ford to future totally dependent on longitudal front engine vehicles- Not a good product mix to be locked in to as buyers shift to smaller vehicles.

  7. On 11/3/2023 at 3:01 PM, jpd80 said:

    Absolutely 


     


    Porsche Cayenne CD is 0.36, not that anyone asked

    Transit Connect CD is 0.31 which impressed the heck out of me 

    Transit Connect aerodynamics are impressive, coast down takes a half mile of so and the rear is well shaped for towing trailers- Pulled a motorcycle on a trailer this weekend and the MPG barely dropped at all.

    • Like 1
  8. Ford has a whole real estate section of the company, but they seem to operate more like a benevolent estate manager than a profit making operation. For example, TCAP closed in 2011 but demolition and ultimately selling to a developer took a decade- That's a long time to be paying taxes on an unproductive big city property surrounded by expensive homes. Last I heard Ford still owns a farm acquired by Henry near Detroit, and the payback on the Detroit railroad station rehab will probably take a century or more. 

  9. But in the rural market I live in pushing EVs is counter productive- First we have to sell customers on PHEVs in familiar packaging, and after people take a liking to that little taste of electrification they'll go EV next decade. The market for EVs and even PHEVs is even worse in urban neighborhoods where the majority of the housing is rental and often with street parking only- Parking lot and on street chargers are too expensive for landlords to invest in and public funded curb side chargers will get plundered for copper if they don't get run over first!

  10. We're almost to the "can't give them away" point out here- Dealer in Mankato, a college town of about 50K population, has a new Leaf discounted down to the mid $20Ks. The few people and organizations that have invested in EVs, charging, etc. out here largely got burned and they're warning all their friends and enemies. I dipped my toes into battery storage and solar with a $3K investment, unit doesn't work correctly and "support" won't even talk to me so that hundred pounds of HazMat will be disposed of at Costco's returns counter. 

     

    This is the 2020s version of what GM did to diesel passenger cars- The technology has been pushed out before it's mature and the "evangelists" have only worsened the growing hatred of EVs. Would have been wiser to evolve through PHEVs and biofuels before electrics, but with the EV backlash that's building it will be had to sell even a simple hybrid out here for years. 

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...