Jasper Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Was this guy Ackerman a trustee?If he was and something was wrong why did he not bring it to the executive board?Seems to me he was trying to use his title as a trustee to give legitimacy to his claim.He then seems to be making rash and probably wild claims.If so he was lucky that he wasn't sued and got off with just a warning.They tell me that Donovan was re elected after this was an issue,if so,then why are we discussing it now.The Vazur letter[Gallogly obviously knew who signed it]however is dealing with present times so it is subject to discussion.Donovan must have responded to ACKERMAN [HE,DONOVAN, WAS RE ELECTED]Nick still has time to respond to the Vazur letter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furious1Auto Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 Was this guy Ackerman a trustee?If he was and something was wrong why did he not bring it to the executive board?Seems to me he was trying to use his title as a trustee to give legitimacy to his claim.He then seems to be making rash and probably wild claims.If so he was lucky that he wasn't sued and got off with just a warning.They tell me that Donovan was re elected after this was an issue,if so,then why are we discussing it now.The Vazur letter[Gallogly obviously knew who signed it]however is dealing with present times so it is subject to discussion.Donovan must have responded to ACKERMAN [HE,DONOVAN, WAS RE ELECTED]Nick still has time to respond to the Vazur letter. Good questions, but why the new thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.