Jump to content

KYSkipper

Member
  • Posts

    90
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

278 profile views

KYSkipper's Achievements

0

Reputation

  1. Ok, you can stop now. I don't need an extended warranty on my 2004 F250 that you couldn't/wouldn't fix under the factory warranty. I don't want any more calls, letters, or contact from people who you evidently "Shared" my name and address with. I don't need your dang warranty. The Dodge Dealer I traded that pile of junk to might know someone who does, but it darn sure isn't me. Skip
  2. Ok, you can stop now. I don't need an extended warranty on my 2004 F250 that you couldn't/wouldn't fix under the factory warranty. I don't want any more calls, letters, or contact from people who you evidently "Shared" my name and address with. I don't need your dang warranty. The Dodge Dealer I traded that pile of junk to might know someone who does, but it darn sure isn't me. Skip
  3. You all want to blame the dealers and the vehicle owners for your part in the problem, and that's not right. A mechanic's job is to find a broken part and replace it. Nowhere in that job description is it the mechanic's job to engineer the system, that's the manufacturer's responsibility. Mechanic's aren't design engineers or machinists, and to jump on them because they can't fix a system that was faulty in it's engineering from the start is way out of bounds. You say take it to another diesel mechanic. That shows exactly how ignorant you are of this product. The 6.0 liter was designed to NOT be serviced by anyone other than a Ford Dealer. For what it's worth, the Cummins in the Dodge isn't designed that way. The Cummins is a common engine. It's in boats, busses, larger trucks, equipment, and who knows what all else. Other than a few sensors here and there and the plumbing to put it in a pickup, it's the same motor. The 6.0 is not a common engine. The version in an F250 is a Ford only engine. Yes, there is a version that International puts in some light truck, but it is far from the one that's in the Ford trucks. The International version only makes 250 hp. The entire top end of the 6.0 in the Fords is a Ford design not International. The fuel system is completely different on a VT365 than it is on a 6.0. About the only common thing they share is the middle section of the block and similar heads. They fact that you dont know that you can't work on one of these engines very much without Ford's special tools proves your ignorance of the product. One local shop that takes care of a lot of fleet vehicles, the owner has told me a few times that now that these engines are running out of warranty he is considering the investment in training and tooling to work on them, but the cost is very high and he's not real sure he wants people mad at him when he can't fix these messes. The fact is, for most serious work on a 6.0, it requires removal of the cab. That's not something that can be done in a couple of hours. Removal and replacement at best is half a days job. Nobody wants to pay for cab removal at $80 an hour. Your talking about $400 worth of labor that has nothing to do with fixing the engine, just getting to it in order to fix it. Guess what happens if you go through the cab removal process, fix the engine, put the cab back on and find out something else isn't exactly right? From what I've heard, it only gets worse with the 6.4. You need to learn who your customers are and how it is you make a living. The UAW doesn't guarantee you a job and neither does Ford Motor Company. Your dealers and the people that buy vehicles from your dealers are who makes sure you have a job. You and Ford ought to be kissing your dealer's feet. They are the ones that sell these vehicles for you. If there are no sales, there's certainly no reason to have a manufacturing plant or employees. If you expect to market $45,000 + trucks, you cant tick off the final buyers by treating them the way I got treated and refusing to do what is necessary to solve a problem with a product. The fact that my dealership and I ended up having words over this mess wasn't entirely their fault. While I felt like they could have been more helpful, it wasn't more helpful to fix the truck, it was more helpful in dealing with Ford Motor Company to get that truck replaced or the engine replaced or whatever was necessary to put a permanent end to the problems. Companies that take care of business get a good name and loyal buyers of their products. Those loyal buyers are worth more than 10 30 second ads during the Superbowl. Skipper
  4. You've obviously never tried to fill up one of those bastard trucks. A couple of the service stations around here have 4x4 blocks beside the diesel pumps to pull the Fords up on one side so you can put fuel in the tank. Bull crap. I took it to more than one non-Ford diesel tech. For what it's worth, I've been qualified enough to keep my 1995 7.3 on the road since I've owned it. It's never been to a dealer shop. I did take the EGR off this 6 liter and look down in the intake and saw what the problem was. No way in hell an engine can run with that much carbon in it. You could have dumped a charcoal bag in it and it wouldn't have made much difference to the mess in there. No, I'm not going to spend my time pulling a cab off a truck so I can get the rest of the top of that engine off to clean it out. I bought a new truck so it would be someone else's place to work on it. My 95 is out of warranty, I can work on it all I want to, that's why I bought the new one and intended to retire the old one. The point in owning a new vehicle is having one you don't have to work on. From the sound of things, you are probably a 5 star employee for Ford. Your attitude is about like everyone else's I've talked to in that outfit. Skipper
  5. It could be a lot of people are saying, "In 03 and 04 Ford let me pay $40,000 to become a member of the Research and Development team for the 6.0. This time around, I believe I'll just sit the R&D out and let someone else do that." I think people want to see several someone elses with 70,000 to 90,000 miles on these. Skipper
  6. I don't see why the Dodge would have been the #3 truck. I guess to a bunch of guys who drive a Honda on a daily basis maybe, but to someone who has driven pickup trucks since he was 14 years old I believe I'm as qualified as they were. First off, there's quite a bit of difference in "Carrying" and "Pulling" weight. I have personally put right at 5000 pound of coal on an F250, I can tell you certain, it wasn't one of these newer ones. This was a 72 model with a 1 ton axle under it and extra heavy overloads on it. We had 10" sideboards on it to hold the coal. I seriously doubt the ability of an F250, Chevy 2500, or Dodge either one to haul 2 tons in the bed. For one thing, 2 tons of most things won't fit in a short bed at all certainly not coal or gravel. I have had about 3500 lbs of gravel in my 1995 F250 and I certainly wouldn't have wanted to try running it 70 mph loaded like that. Towing is another matter. The average 21' bass boat probably weighs close to 4000 lbs rigged and loaded. Towing 4000 lbs with a 3/4 ton truck should be no task at all. I've towed in excess of 10,000 lbs with both of my F250's. That's light compared to what some tow with theirs. I know a few individuals towing farm equipment, cattle, and farm products with weights exceeding 20,000. One guy I know has a corn wagon he built from the bed and frame of a tandem Mack Truck. I don't know exactly what it weighs loaded, but I would estimate 15 ton would be on the light side. He has used Dodges for years pulling that thing. I've seen them so loaded that the front axle on the pickup was barely on the ground. Now, that said, I looked at a Chevy Duramax, but I didn't think much of it. For one thing, it's difficult to find a Chevy with a Manual tranny. The Allison is nice, but if I have to mess with 3 buttons and 3 drive positions on the handle, I'd just assume mash a clutch and stick it in gear. When I did find a manual I discovered Chevy no longer thinks synchronizers are necessary in manual trannys. I also noticed the Duramax being a lot like the Ford. "Turbo Lag" or whatever you all come up with to describe an engine that won't go when you mash the fuel pedal. Dodge's Cummins doesn't have that problem. It's ready to roll when you are. Dodge's clutch system is sweet. I don't know what it was with that 6.0, I guess the Dual Mass Flywheel that they finally figured out wasn't a good idea. But everytime you were in stop and go traffic it'd sound like the clutch was going to fall out of it when you pushed it in. The Dodge is as solid as I've ever driven. There's no rattle to it at all. Did I mention the Cummins is getting 19 mpg. That's at least 2 mpg better than the Ford ever got and 5 mpg better than it was getting when I traded it. That's what? A 33% fuel savings. I did fill up today and the Ford advertised a 29 gallon tank, but it was very difficult to put more than 24 gallons in it. The Dodge advertises 32 gallons. I stuck the fuel handle in it and it cut off at 30.5 gallons and easily took another .6 gallons after I let the air settle out. Combine the extra fuel with 33% better milage, that's about 260 miles per tank better than Ford. For what it's worth, the F250 started out at 8 mpg on the first tank and it took about 2000 miles for it to break in and get it's best of 17 mpg. Dodge's Cummins has never been accused of lacking power by anyone that I know of. They are quite a bit cheaper to work on than the 6.0's. A simple oil change needs a gallon less oil than does a 6 liter. They only put that same engine in everything from boats to tractors to cranes buses and pickups. As far as that test goes, who cares what a pickup truck will run on a quarter mile drag strip or how fast it is 0 to 60. Notice at what RPM Ford measures the torque on a 6.0. It's 2000 RPMs. People don't pull out onto the highway with a loaded truck with the engine spooled to 2000 RPM's. Dodge measures the Cummins torque at 1600 RPM's which is a little more reasonable. The fact is, an inline 6 cylinder will always out torque a V8. Ever wonder why a 300 6 cylinder was always offered in an F250 but a 302 V8 wasn't? The 302 would out horspower the 300/6 but the 6 cylinder would get a load moving the 302 wouldnt budge. The longer stroke wins every time in that category. Like I said before, the only thing noticably lacking from Dodge is running boards, a tailgate protector, and bed caps. What was that about Ford supplying a truck with 430 gears in it to pull against trucks with 373 gears? Those 430 gears ought to keep it under 75 mph permanently. Skipper
  7. When you find another mechanic that has the $150,000 worth of specialized tools and computers to work on these Ford engines, let the Dodge dealer know, he'd like to know how to get that mess started so he can sell it. Skipper
  8. Ford pay another shop, bull hockey. They wouldn't pay the wrecker to tow it back to their shop when it quit 4 days after they worked on it. If the problems were that well known, Ford should have done some more research on the problems, solved them and then sold trucks with that engine in it that was dependable. Not sold it, then figure out it wouldn't run and costs a shit load to fix. Skipper
  9. Good luck on the new truck. Poor ole Earnie Fletcher has been beat to death, why Boo him? Skipper
  10. I did want it fixed, tried everything I knew to try to get it fixed, it never worked out. When you have a mechanic and Ford engineer tell you they have no idea how to fix it and that the 6.0 is just a piece of junk, I have no idea what else you do other than get ticked off over the money you lost on your purchase. The fact is, it could have been fixed and both that mechanic and engineer knew what to do to fix it, but Ford and it's cheap skate ways didn't want to pay to do it right and would just authorize as little as possible to attempt to get it back on the road and out of their hair. The way I see it, Ford cost me about $25,000. No, I'm not going to forget about it and it may be a while before I let Ford forget about it. Skipper
  11. Let's see, Someone on here advised me that I'd need to replace the spark plugs, spark plug wires and ignition system on my diesel engine. Excuse me If I'm still looking for qualified advice. I have had other diesel mechanics look at it. That's about all anyone other than a Ford garage can do with a 6.0. They are too damn complicated for the dealers to work on them with $150,000 worth of tools specially designed for working on that one engine much less anyone else. In all honesty, nobody other than a Ford Tech has any intention of pulling a cab off a truck just to work on the engine. The shops that regularly take care of my vehicles have very qualified mechanics. I took my truck to another Ford dealer, it ran 5 days that time instead of the 4 days it ran the time before. The one guy that advised me that they didn't want people like me driving Ford Trucks might have given the best advice. You might find in the near future I've gotten rid of my 95 F250 and my 03 Expedition and be done with Fords all together. The fact is, that Dodge 2500 with a Cummins that I'm driving now blows that F250 out of the water, it's not even a close comparison. Last night I went across the mountain and back and just to see if it would, I left it in high gear all the way up. I had absolutely no problem doing it. That switchback turn that I generally had to brake down to 20 mph in the Ford, the Dodge's superior suspension will handle it at 30, and unlike the Ford that I'd have had to drop back to 3rd gear on, I never pulled the Dodge out of Overdrive, the engine never lugged at all. Oh, that 8 mpg my Ford averaged on it's first tank on it's way to being broken in, or was that broken down, when it climbed up to 14 mpg, My Dodge is sitting on 18 mpg on the first tank right now. Comparison: Power: Dodge by far Economy: Dodge by a good bit Ride Quality: Dodge by a long shot Trim Pieces like Running boards and bed rail protection: Ford (Like a few hundred bucks won't cure that) Ford ought to spend about $40,000 on one of these Dodges and see if they can copy some of it. Skipper
  12. I don't know about him, but that F250 of mine was not safe. It lost power and had a serious problem getting going from a dead stop. If you were pulling out into traffic on a 4 lane or some such you might and might not be able to get on out of the way to keep from getting ran over. Sometimes, you'd let the clutch out and it'd go on, sometimes it would hesitate for 10-15-20-who knows how many seconds. Then there was the stalling out deal when you'd let the clutch out and it'd quit because you could stomp the pedal to the floor and it wouldn't rev up. It did the stalling out trick twice on a set of railroad tracks, I just wish it hadn't started back the 3rd time and I'd left it there. Skipper
  13. I know darn good and well they didn't use my Ford in that test. If they had, and S-10 would probably have out pulled it. Having driven both A Powerstroke and a Cummins, I can say without reservation, the Powerstroke couldn't keep up with the Cummin's smoke from 0 to 70. It might catch it after a while above 80 mph, but that's not relevant to most people's pickup truck driving habits or for that matter what the law allows on the highway. In an unofficial test (mine), the Dodge wins hands down. First of all, the Cummins is QUIET. The Powerstroke doesn't attempt to be quiet. You can actually hold a conversation in the Dodge, swing through the drive through and order a biscuit in the morning. Go to the bank or whatever. Dodges come with Michelin tires not Generals or Conti Traps or Pirelli's or whatever was cheaper this week. There's no comparrison between the Generals my F250 came with that would not stay balanced and the Michelins. The Dodge rides like a half ton. The Ford rode about the same as my 95 F250, and you definitely knew you were in a heavy truck. The front end on the Dodge doesn't shimmy on the road like a Ford, steering wheel doesn't shake, and it's smooth. Even with harder seats than the Ford, the Dodge offers a better ride not beating the dickens out of you. Guess what, the Dodge needs a Gallon less oil than the Ford, it's fuel filter is easily accessible without crawling under the truck, you won't dump fuel on yourself trying to change it. It has a normal lever to operate the water drain not a plug that takes a 6 mm allen head that can't accept a ratchet because it's too close to the drive shaft. No need to go to the Cummins place and buy a special plug to alleviate aggrivation draining the water, they've got it figured out. The air filter is toolless to remove and replace, easily done in a few minutes. You can see and put your hands on any part on that engine. There's no goam of wires, hoses, and coolant bottles on top of the motor. It doesn't appear that you have to take the cab off to do normal repair work. Fact is, I don't see a reason that you'd have to take the cab off at all. If you needed to, plenty of room to pull the engine. The first tank of fuel Through my F250 got less than 200 miles at about 8 mpg. Once broke in it climbed to almost 17 mpg if you babied it then when the engine started having problems it fell off to about 14 mpg and never recovered. The Dodge is getting right at 17 mpg so far according to the onboard computer. I suspect it'll eventually get 20 or so mpg. I've yet to see an F250 get that. My 95 gets 18.5 mpg but definitely not the 6.0. I do have to admit, Ford has an edge on accessories such as running boards, fender flares and bed caps. I guess money had to be spent somewhere. Not like this is something a few hundred bucks at the custom shop can't cure. Skipper
  14. You ain't righ, just not right at all. Skipper
  15. It doesn't need one, it runs. Skipper
×
×
  • Create New...