Jump to content

sunroofcuda

Member
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sunroofcuda

  1. OK, offer is not available to CA. residents. I shouldn't have to try this hard to be nice. Come on guys - Ford used them! Must be nobody's on this site anymore.
  2. Come on guys, you are depressing me. This ain't no phone or mail scam - stop being paranoid. Under $60.00/ea. The taker on this deal pays freight (around $12.00). These are made in the USA, not China. What are you going to get? Awesome (& different) exhaust sound & very high CFM flow. When SVT installed these onto the '03 Cobra (with OE pipes), they ran the car over to Paul's H.P. to dyno it, & it had gained about 10 HP. The mechanics, engineers, & marketing people at Ford & Roush liked these mufflers better than anything else they had tried on these cars - by a long shot.
  3. Purchase them, then you have 30 days to install them & post your opinions here on Blue Oval News - good or bad. Notify us when you post & we'll send you a refund for the full cost of the mufflers, less shipping. We've already done this promo before - it's real. If I "give" a pair away without a commitment, there won't be the urgency to put them on. So, someone needs to be ready to do exhaust right now for this offer to work. These mufflers do not have an offset, so it may require a trip to the muffler shop to adapt these in place. 2.5" exhaust is probably optimum for the GT's & Cobras. Thanks, -Eric
  4. Got to get you Mustang guys back in the loop here. First interested party to contact us gets a FREE pair of mufflers. The LS1tech.com people are eating these up with their Firebirds/Camaros. Ford used a pair on an '03 Cobra & it blew them away. Contact us for details. You must post results after the installation. Guaranteed you are gonna love them. www.classicchambered.com
  5. I agree 100%! For those of you complaining about "old" sheetmetal & the need for new - what's up with that? We learn by looking back, & there's a reason why NICE Challenger R/T's are bringing HUGE bucks, as well as nice '69-'70 Mach 1's (& lots of other classic musclecars). There's what's called a styling pinnacle - when everything just comes together RIGHT. To change it is to ruin it. Tom Gale, retired Chrysler designer still maintains today that the 1970 Barracuda hit the "pinnacle" of styling among all the vehicles Chrysler has ever built. This is why the reborn GTO is a joke - it's a disgrace to call it GTO. They should have called it a "Super Cavalier" or something like that. Hell, if GM was smart, they'd get on the bandwagon & re-create the '65 GTO (probably the most popular of all the GTO's). But what some of you are saying, is to re-create something like the '65 GTO, & make it look "modernized" - well that would ruin it for sure. You guys are missing the whole point of hindsight & retro. Just about as much as the Camaro concept looks like a Camaro, they should call it an Audi or something. GM is missing the whole point also. Their Asstec & Avalanche styling teams are not getting the message. No wonder GM is in bad shape. Now as far as making the Mustang or Challenger a 4-door - that's goofy.
  6. Leave it to GM to create something radically different than what Ford (& Dodge - Challenger) has proven success with - GOING RETRO ON AN OLD MUSCLECAR! GM stylists just had to try & "one-up" all the competitors with something frigging RADICAL-looking, that has absolutely NO ties with the Camaro nameplate whatsoever. My point is, if they would have maintained course on the formula of success that Ford is seeing with the restyled "retro" Mustang, & Dodge is about to see with the Challenger, they could have also seen a huge success. But NOPE, they had to get the styling team that no doubt created the Avalanche & Asstec involved - just to get it all wrong AGAIN! Now I don't want to sound totally negative here - the car does look cool, but it will be a niche vehicle at best. But, if GM's goal was to ride on the success of the Mustang re-style, & Dodge's about-to, they needed to stick to the '69 Camaro architecture. That is if they wanted to sell a boatload of them. This kind of behavoir is typical of GM IMO.
  7. That's gonna be hard to do with fascias. They (Mopar) are on the right track, but the lower sheetmetal makes the car look pudgy compared to the old Challenger. The production car will undoubtedly look different than the originals - hopefully better than the concept (which looks pretty cool). As far as re-doing an old original, I think Ford would have sold many more 'Stangs if they had re-created the 1966 to a "T", but with all the drivetrain, suspension, electrical updates, etc. You'd have little old ladies going out & buying them to put in their garage. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the new Mustangs! I think retro is cool - plus you can't improve something that was right-on the first time!
×
×
  • Create New...