Floyd Lawson

Excellent question.

Yes, he is. Examples>>>>> Of course, you've never been one to let the facts get in the way.

Your wasting your time with him. This is exactly the mind-set that this president has. They don't value the lives of our older citizen or the unborn, to them they are expendable.

And a right cross to the head, I think Ranger has Ed on the ropes. Seriously you described him spot-on.

I agree with you rc. A lot of these people will end up the same as the those who were in mortgages that they could not afford. This program is another big government give away, when it's gone, we'll be right back in the same situation. This rush to buy is just temporary.

While the cash for clunkers program has been considered a success, the adminisrtation of it has been a failure, from computer system meltdowns to under-estimated demand. This is small compared to what a national healthcare program would be. Now it should be clear the the government can't run anything efficiently and why there would be long lines and rationing. Link

According to the HR web site, HR 3200, America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, was introduced into the House on July 14, 2009. And I say that NOW is the time to get excited about this bill and the president's attempt to jam it down our throats. Why wait? Most congressmen will be home this month and some will be holding "town hall" meetings so this will afford the American people an opportunity to let them know how we feel about this bill and ask the tough questions>>>>>like what's the hurry? and how are we going to pay for this? So we shouldn't be sitting on our hands and letting this happen.

It has everything to do with the govt. trying to manage,>>>>>>>anything. They totally under estimated this program and had to stop it. Just like they are under estimating the cost of socialized medicine. This so-called clunker program is awaste of my tax dollars. Why should have to help buy you a car?

This should really raise our confidence that the government could manage our health care @ a trillion $$ but can't manage this one with a billion $$.

So you are employed in the health and safety field?

You should know about brain-damaged twaddle. And if you go back and look you'll see that suv injected the term "a long time", not me, I'm just trying to determine how long that was. Capice? I'm sure this young man appreciates you defending his "extensive" background of historical studies.

It's all in your perspective.

How much is a long time?

I noticed you dodged the SS comment again. You're the one who bought that into the post, but when someone presents you with the facts, you changed the subject. Very convenient.

Nice try, that bill came out of a democrat congress led by Tip O'Neil. Maybe you don't totally understand how our government functions. All spending comes in the form of a bill, a spending bill if you will. As stated before the dems held a sizable majority so they knew what they were doing. I know this is difficult for you since you have tried your best to paint this totally as a Reagan deal. However, the very next year, 1984, Reagan went on the carry 49 of 50 states in the election plus the Repub. picked up 16 additional seats in the House so obviously people were pleased with what he was doing. Your problem is that you know just enough to make you look stupid, and you probably got these few talking points from the union hall. You obviously haven't done much research.