dark270 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 So says noted world economist BoldAndLame. What a joke. All of that crap you spew is complete BS -- every last syllable. Just on the unemployment numbers, the only people who are not working are basically those who choose not to. Nobody has fallen off the rolls. If you can't get a job in this economy, you either have no skills or don't want a job. My take-home pay is up about 20% since 2003 thanks to the tax cuts and increased business. Hey, they helped pay for a new Lincoln in February. Doesn't that make you happy? Your problem is that you hate the world and hate the President so much, you choose to ignore good news about the economy and the country. I guess that's the difference between you and me. I'm a rich optimist, but you're a poor union goon pessimist. I hope your job is replace with a robot. Shitwad. your still an idiot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heywood Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 your still an idiot! Aww, Darkie! Thanks, I always knew you cared! And the feeling is mutual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark270 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 1. i feel safer in my country now, than before 9/11.2. i've gotten 2 or 3 "tax relief checks"...never got one of those from a democrat. 3. the stock market is at an all time high. 4. intrest rates reached an all time low....under a republican. 5. new home building is at or near an all time high. i could go on and on, but theres really no need to. that explains plenty to me. interest rates are low ?? wow...it is 6.9% on a 30 year fixed mortgage i got a 5.0 rate back in the day ...(before bushie) new home build ing is on the way down.....all signs point to a slowing of the economy..which is modest at BEST! WTF ?? safer ? nope.....not when reports are released that say security has several guys 'sneak' stuff past there own people ..LOL.... just because stocks are up doesn't mean everybody is feeling it! they are mainly the super wealthy on the stock market... Aww, Darkie! Thanks, I always knew you cared! And the feeling is mutual. i'm sure it is....but your still the same anti union sucker! Aww, Darkie! Thanks, I always knew you cared! And the feeling is mutual. i'm sure it is....but your still the same anti union sucker! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heywood Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Why? Because we are breeding terrorists?http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml.../29/nmemo29.xml Anything printed in the UK Telegraph is left-wing propoganda and should not be believed. Ditto with the NYTimes. Answer me this, FMCCap: If there are more terrorists now, why have they not attacked the US homeland? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark270 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Anything printed in the UK Telegraph is left-wing propoganda and should not be believed. Ditto with the NYTimes. Answer me this, FMCCap: If there are more terrorists now, why have they not attacked the US homeland? oh i see...deny anything that is not right wing...LOL religous NUTCASE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heywood Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 i'm sure it is....but your still the same anti union sucker! And you're the same union goon! BTW, how are your classes going? I hope you are doing well (seriously). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark270 Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 And you're the same union goon! BTW, how are your classes going? I hope you are doing well (seriously). actually i am...enjoying classes alot...it is not easy..but then again nothing is i'm not a goon.....union is a man made instituion and just like everything it is not perfect! so why should you expect it to be ? you seriously dont blame the company for it's own downfall ? the direction of the company is most important! and the top management has put us here by not making the right decisions(ie designing cars people want) you cannot blame all the unions for this.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boldandlame Posted October 30, 2006 Share Posted October 30, 2006 Anything printed in the UK Telegraph is left-wing propoganda and should not be believed. Ditto with the NYTimes. Answer me this, FMCCap: If there are more terrorists now, why have they not attacked the US homeland? Because we're losing a proxy war in Iraq Peckerwood! So far, more US casualties than 9/11. Another Neochimp outed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Anything printed in the UK Telegraph is left-wing propoganda and should not be believed. Ditto with the NYTimes. Answer me this, FMCCap: If there are more terrorists now, why have they not attacked the US homeland? Bush stopped them all. lolol Answer me this, Heywool: What has he stopped? How did sept. 11 happen in the first place? You call it left-wing others call it right-wing propoganda. I call it a hen house with alot of wing-less chickens(you). You can not just believe what you see on the news or from either side. It's all just what they want you to hear. Use your own head. If it was all propaganda( "The memo, circulated in recent weeks to ministers and security chiefs and seen by The Sunday Telegraph, outlines an extraordinary "wish list" of how the Government would like world troublespots to look in 10 years' time." Don't you think the government would take some action against them? The Memo" might be the answer why, they have proof. P.S. Here's a link about your national security - Airport screeners fail to see most test bombs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heywood Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 Bush stopped them all. lolol Answer me this, Heywool: What has he stopped? How did sept. 11 happen in the first place? 9/11 happened because the Clinton Administration did not aggressively go after the attacks in the early 1990s: The first WTC bombing in 1993, Khobar Towers bombings, the bombings of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the bombing of the USS Cole. By not responding, Slick Willie gave the terrorists encouragement that nothing would be done about terrorist activities. When Bush was elected and 9/11 happened, that all changed. Now we go after those terrorists, and that has resulted in fewer attacks. Pretty simple, as I see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 9/11 happened because the Clinton Administration did not aggressively go after the attacks in the early 1990s: The first WTC bombing in 1993, Khobar Towers bombings, the bombings of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the bombing of the USS Cole. By not responding, Slick Willie gave the terrorists encouragement that nothing would be done about terrorist activities. When Bush was elected and 9/11 happened, that all changed. Now we go after those terrorists, and that has resulted in fewer attacks. Pretty simple, as I see it. Pretty simple, If he is so great why did nothing happen on that morning? There was a 6 hour timeline. After the towers were hit where was NORAD to intercept the other two? I have found nothing! If we went after them why did we go to IRAQ? Now Iraq is a terrorist haven breeding terrorists. Iraq War Fueling Terrorism, Intelligence Report Says The document is still classified but it reportedly paints Iraq as a breeding ground for Islamist radicals. Show me some proof that he has stopped any attacks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DearbornDerek Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 9/11 happened because the Clinton Administration did not aggressively go after the attacks in the early 1990s: The first WTC bombing in 1993, Khobar Towers bombings, the bombings of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the bombing of the USS Cole. By not responding, Slick Willie gave the terrorists encouragement that nothing would be done about terrorist activities. When Bush was elected and 9/11 happened, that all changed. Now we go after those terrorists, and that has resulted in fewer attacks. Pretty simple, as I see it. I don't normally post when it comes to politics but enough already. So Clinton did nothing? I guess you forgot about the bombs he dropped on Bin Ladens trainging camps. Thats right, thats not enough (although it was enough when Reagan ONLY dropped bombs on Libya) we need to have a full scale invasion. In truth I would have been fine with that....BUT....Bush dropped the ball and took his eye of the prize to chase down another demon and start a police action that will last God knows how long and drain more of our millitary resources. Meanwhile the taliban is regaining power and the REAL threat to our nation is testing nukes when they feel like it. Fewer attacks? major attacks against the U.S. have been years apart and the last one was discovered (thank God before it happened) by the BRITISH. At least someone is getting intel BEFORE something happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted October 31, 2006 Share Posted October 31, 2006 (edited) Most gays are Democrats like Dark. I am a Conservative. If he is looking for some action, he should go to the gay area. I am trying to ignore you too, Dark. Are you still a Ford employee? This is a Ford employee forum. For Trimdingman - RNC Accepted Political Contributions From Gay Porn King? - Maybe you can go with who you support and go watch them film there next movie!!!!!!!!!!!! :banmolest: Point Being - If I could shit billions of dollars, I could get them to pass a law to give me free toilet paper if I gave them nice contributions. Edited October 31, 2006 by fmccap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 For Trimdingman - RNC Accepted Political Contributions From Gay Porn King? - Maybe you can go with who you support and go watch them film there next movie!!!!!!!!!!!! :banmolest: Point Being - If I could shit billions of dollars, I could get them to pass a law to give me free toilet paper if I gave them nice contributions. This was for you Trimdingman! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktpworker69 Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 The UAW is like any other segment of society. About half the members are democrat, and half republicians. I recall that it was bill clintion who signed NAFTA into law. NAFTA has hurt autoworkers in so many ways, but the uaw still worships the ground that clintion walks on. UAW leadership needs to wake up. President Bush's tax cuts added an extra $60.00 to my paycheck. The tax cut has helped the working man , but the uaw fails to give credit where credit is due. how many "tax relief checks" have we ever gotten from a democrat?? is it zero, none, zilch, nil?? thought so....the uaw sure didnt bitch about a tax break huh? Do you guys think this congress has done the will of the people?They have done the will of the big corporations. Think about it. I think the slogan for all democratic candidates this year should be : HAD ENOUGH YET? should be "HAD ENOUGH YET, WAIT TILL WE GET BACK IN OFFICE" Anything printed in the UK Telegraph is left-wing propoganda and should not be believed. Ditto with the NYTimes. Answer me this, FMCCap: If there are more terrorists now, why have they not attacked the US homeland? BECAUSE BUSH IS ADAMENT ABOUT PROTECTING OUR COUNTRY....UNLIKE THE DEMOCRATS. THEY JUST WORRY ABOUT THEMSELVES. HUH, KINDA SOUNDS LIKE THE UAW U Are Worthless, that should be thier motto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heywood Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 Pretty simple, If he is so great why did nothing happen on that morning? There was a 6 hour timeline. After the towers were hit where was NORAD to intercept the other two? I have found nothing! If we went after them why did we go to IRAQ? Now Iraq is a terrorist haven breeding terrorists. Iraq War Fueling Terrorism, Intelligence Report Says The document is still classified but it reportedly paints Iraq as a breeding ground for Islamist radicals. Show me some proof that he has stopped any attacks? Some of the proof is in the recently foiled airline hijacking attempt, and the earlier attempt foiled by the British. We went into Iraq because after 9/11, the reality hit us that terrorists can get weapons of mass destruction from unfriendly dictators like Saddam. The fear was that Saddam would give WMD to terrorists to use against us. Based on the intel everyone believed at the time, and given Saddams prior use of WMD on his own people and the people of Iran, this was a distinct possibility. Removing Saddam eliminated that threat. And as for Iraq being a terrorist breeding ground, that's fine with me. Let them breed and be killed over there instead of here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trimdingman Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 (edited) This was for you Trimdingman! Touche! :shrug: Just because no WMDs were found in Iraq, does not prove that they are not there. Wow big is a WMD? How big is Iraq? Edited November 1, 2006 by Trimdingman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 how many "tax relief checks" have we ever gotten from a democrat?? is it zero, none, zilch, nil?? thought so....the uaw sure didnt bitch about a tax break huh? I believe that relief would be giving me something. That check was just a early refund. `(2) ADVANCE REFUND AMOUNT- For purposes of paragraph (1), the advance refund amount is the amount that would have been allowed as a credit under this section for such first taxable year if this section (other than subsection (d) and this subsection) had applied to such taxable year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 Some of the proof is in the recently foiled airline hijacking attempt, and the earlier attempt foiled by the British. We went into Iraq because after 9/11, the reality hit us that terrorists can get weapons of mass destruction from unfriendly dictators like Saddam. The fear was that Saddam would give WMD to terrorists to use against us. Based on the intel everyone believed at the time, and given Saddams prior use of WMD on his own people and the people of Iran, this was a distinct possibility. Removing Saddam eliminated that threat. And as for Iraq being a terrorist breeding ground, that's fine with me. Let them breed and be killed over there instead of here. UK made arrests on Washington pressure: Plane attack was not imminent: official A British official said the uk police were planning to continue to run surveillance for at least another week to try to obtain more evidence, while American officials pressured them to arrest the suspects sooner. In contrast to previous reports, the official suggested an attack was not imminent, saying the suspects had not yet purchased any airline tickets. In fact, some did not even have passports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 Some of the proof is in the recently foiled airline hijacking attempt, and the earlier attempt foiled by the British. We went into Iraq because after 9/11, the reality hit us that terrorists can get weapons of mass destruction from unfriendly dictators like Saddam. The fear was that Saddam would give WMD to terrorists to use against us. Based on the intel everyone believed at the time, and given Saddams prior use of WMD on his own people and the people of Iran, this was a distinct possibility. Removing Saddam eliminated that threat. And as for Iraq being a terrorist breeding ground, that's fine with me. Let them breed and be killed over there instead of here. What is this Heywool? 'Airline plot' brothers walk free from court Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
udontkno Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 You Republicans can say what you want, but Republicans hate unions! At least Democrats will support working people sometimes. But if your a working man under a union, you should at least support the people who support you some of the time rather than none of the time. But with the closing of Atlanta Assy. Plant, I am seeing the anti union, Republican supporters, suck up the Gen and any other union negoitiated benefit. Now they will tell you this and that but what it boils down to is this country has been under Republican control for the last 12 yrs and our union jobs are leaving the country at an alarming rate, with only low paying jobs to fill them. All the while your taxes are going to the tune of over a quater of a trillion dollars to Iraq so the rich can keep getting richer. Look for yourself and quit being brain washed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boldandlame Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 Touche! :shrug:Just because no WMDs were found in Iraq, does not prove that they are not there. Wow big is a WMD? How big is Iraq? How big is Sadam? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem12 Posted November 1, 2006 Share Posted November 1, 2006 You Republicans can say what you want, but Republicans hate unions! At least Democrats will support working people sometimes. But if your a working man under a union, you should at least support the people who support you some of the time rather than none of the time. But with the closing of Atlanta Assy. Plant, I am seeing the anti union, Republican supporters, suck up the Gen and any other union negoitiated benefit. Now they will tell you this and that but what it boils down to is this country has been under Republican control for the last 12 yrs and our union jobs are leaving the country at an alarming rate, with only low paying jobs to fill them. All the while your taxes are going to the tune of over a quater of a trillion dollars to Iraq so the rich can keep getting richer. Look for yourself and quit being brain washed. Although I don't consider myslef a Republican, I didn't support Hanoi John Kerry, and wll neve support the traitorous SOB. But the one thing you seem to remember is the union jobs have been leaving this country at an alarming rate for the last 20 years or so. Which would include every working mans favorite person Bill Clinton, remember he pushed for NAFTA as a part of his campaign. Remember Ross Periot said there would be a giant sucking sound as the jobs left. he was wrong. It started out slow and has built up steam, now there is a giant sucking sound everywhere you go. Dem or Reps have done little to support the working class in this country. Now it appears our own National has deserted many of the locals in favor of whipsawing with the COA agreements going on at almost all of the plants. Remeber the National said this was a local issue but the company is doing it across the board. I wonder what concessions they will want next year when the National Contract comes up for Negotiation. Your Union Leadership has failed right along with the Politicians, they only care about the plants now that are close to the glass house and they are out now to save only those who will keep them there and in a high paying job. Why did we take a 3% cut and they still got raises??? it's time wake up and smell the paint fumes, Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ktpworker69 Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 I believe that relief would be giving me something. That check was just a early refund. `(2) ADVANCE REFUND AMOUNT- For purposes of paragraph (1), the advance refund amount is the amount that would have been allowed as a credit under this section for such first taxable year if this section (other than subsection (d) and this subsection) had applied to such taxable year. you sure the fuck spent it tho didnt ya? thats wtf i thought....did ya bitch and say i dont want it?? i think not :blah: :blah: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 you sure the fuck spent it tho didnt ya? thats wtf i thought....did ya bitch and say i dont want it?? i think not :blah: :blah: Of course I did! I did want it, afterall "IT WAS MY MONEY" to begin with. I love sheep like you who like giving interest free loans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.