fmccap Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 CitiBank – No Questions Asked When the Big Three automakers were finally settled in their chairs before the Congressional committee investigating whether they deserved a handout of $50 billion, they were asked a defining question; “How many of you flew commercial airlines to get here?” No hands went up and they were sunk. Somehow the hubris of trotting about on private jets while asking for public money was simply too much for a suddenly stingy Congress. No such questions were asked of the Citi bankers, in fact no hearings were even held, and they were given access to over $306 billion on the most favorable terms you could possibly imagine. This illustrates the power that the banking industry holds over our political process and it is a ruinous power. Why should Citi receive not only special treatment, but exorbitantly preferential treatment at taxpayer expense? I don’t know, but I’d like some answers. I am, again, more than a little angry at this deal. It seems that when productive industries or actual citizens are involved, money is hard to find and difficult questions are asked. When banks need the cash? The results are enormous, immediate, and exceptionally favorable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lquidspine Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 "Before coming to Treasury, Paulson was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs since the firm’s initial public offering in 1999. He joined Goldman Sachs Chicago Office in 1974 and rose through the ranks holding several positions including, Managing Partner of the firm’s Chicago office, Co-head of the firm's investment Banking Division, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Co-Senior partner"*source link* The Treasury Secretary came from Wall St., should their be any other question why Wall St. gets no hearings money, while companies that actually are the backbone of a supposed industrialized nation gets drilled ? I will also mention that CNN is reporting that Citigroup will be cutting 2,000 jobs within the next 12 months....sad really fucking sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lquidspine Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 Anyone have the odds that these fucks get bonus's over the 10 million mark in 2010 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbg49229 Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 CitiBank – No Questions Asked imo it is because the big 3 are UNION. The public has been taught to hate union workers and these banks get away with paying 15 to 18 $$$$ a hour without many things the union has brought to the big 3! Just ask a few people that dont work for the big 3, ask them what they think about a big 3 bailout and MOST people will say "fuck them, they are the ones who did it to there self, them guys make 65000 a year, have benefits and get paid 95% of ther pay if they get laid off, fuck them fuck them." They dont realize the affect it will have on America if one of the big 3 go south, they just dont care and that is why they bye jap junk. Then ask a few other about a bamk bailout, "oh we have to do that. it will cause to much havic if they go under." I guess the banks didnt cause there own problem but some how the big 3 did............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lackanookey Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 (edited) CitiBank – No Questions Asked The Saudi Royals are the biggest Citigroup stock holders, so do you really think that Bush is going to let his Saudi friends lose money? Edited November 26, 2008 by lackanookey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantasyfrank Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 imo it is because the big 3 are UNION. The public has been taught to hate union workers and these banks get away with paying 15 to 18 $$$$ a hour without many things the union has brought to the big 3! Just ask a few people that dont work for the big 3, ask them what they think about a big 3 bailout and MOST people will say "fuck them, they are the ones who did it to there self, them guys make 65000 a year, have benefits and get paid 95% of ther pay if they get laid off, fuck them fuck them." They dont realize the affect it will have on America if one of the big 3 go south, they just dont care and that is why they bye jap junk. Then ask a few other about a bamk bailout, "oh we have to do that. it will cause to much havic if they go under." I guess the banks didnt cause there own problem but some how the big 3 did............ I agree with your reply 1000%. The general public hates us because they are jealous. If they could of worked for the big 3, they would have in a new york minute. Has the big 3 made mistakes? Yes, but so have the banks....HUGE mistakes and all they gotta do is pickup the phone and shed a few tears and Uncle Sam cranks up the printing presses and say's ...."HERE YA' GO MR.BANKER". It makes me so freakin' sick I could puke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpc655 Posted November 26, 2008 Share Posted November 26, 2008 hopefully this pic shows up... I'm not looking forward to getting this bill from uncle sam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zora Posted November 27, 2008 Share Posted November 27, 2008 These Dumbasses are giving all the $$$ to the banks....Well, if Nobody has a job who's going to do the borrowing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderinglost Posted November 27, 2008 Share Posted November 27, 2008 It's not about who you know, it's about who you b%*#.................and that's the simple truth about why they don't even have to ask for money, it just appears when they want it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmccap Posted November 27, 2008 Author Share Posted November 27, 2008 The Crisis Has Hardly Begun Conservative talking heads are saying GM is a "failed business model" unworthy of a $25 billion bailout. These are the same talking heads who favored pouring $700 billion into a failed financial model. The head of the FDIC is trying to get $25 billion--a measly 3.5 percent of the $700 billion for the banksters--with which to refinance the mortgages of 2 million of the banksters’ victims, and Bush’s Secretary of the Treasury Paulson says no. Why aren’t the Democrats all over this, too? Apparently, the Democrats still think they are the minority party—or else their aim is to supplant the Republicans as the party of the rich. Any bailout has its downsides. But if America loses its auto industry, it will lose the suppliers as well and will cease to have a manufacturing sector. For years no-think economists have been writing off America’s manufacturing jobs, while deluding themselves and the public with propaganda about a New Economy based on finance. A country that doesn’t make anything doesn’t need a financial sector as there is nothing to finance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbg49229 Posted November 27, 2008 Share Posted November 27, 2008 The Crisis Has Hardly Begun Maybe the big 3 need to spend millions and millions in lobbying so the can get what they want just like oil, banks and insurance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soon2bout Posted November 27, 2008 Share Posted November 27, 2008 Plain & Simple if your on WALL STREET you get your NUTS HELD FOR FOR YOU . If YOUR ON MAIN STREET YOU LEARN TO HOLD YOUR OWN NUTS . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychodaveone Posted December 5, 2008 Share Posted December 5, 2008 i bought a house 1 1/2 yrs. ago...the mortgage was held by American Eagle. It was switched to CitiMortgage a few months later, of which i had no knowledge until i received my monthly statement lol. I also looked into the ownership of the institutions issuing my (too many lol) credit cards. MOST of them are owned by Citi. My question is....if the Big Three are required to divest some of its holdings....shouldn't this also apply to the banking industry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.