igor Posted June 13, 2006 Share Posted June 13, 2006 (edited) Via Autoblog: http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/invento...uit-against-gm/ From: Fortune Small Bussiness: http://biz.yahoo.com/hfsb/060609/042406_gm_fsb.html?.v=1 Also see : http://www.evansvsgm.com/ talk about big ticket item... the worst thing is .. GM seems to have actually stolen the item, making the claim a plausible one, and the 12bill expense a possibility. Igor Edited June 13, 2006 by igor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. KABC Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 WOW... $12 billion... I wonder how they derived that figure? Seems like an almost comical amount, kind of like a tobacco lawsuit settlement. If true, GM really tried to screw Evans. Why am I not surprised? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadrunner Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Holy screwjob! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark B. Morrow Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 If GMs Lawyers participated in the creation of the falsified evidence and offered it to the Court knowing it was false they should be disbarred permanently. To do anything less makes a mockery of the entire legal system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe771476 Posted June 19, 2006 Share Posted June 19, 2006 Simply reversing the path would not have been grounds to sue GM. But the anti vapor technology apparently is. And does anyone know why the litigation in 2003 was brought in CT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.