Langston Hughes Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Just because. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Wide angle lens suggests he had plenty of time to slow down. I saw the cows on the left side of the road well before the other two crossed his path. Daylight, clear skies, no roadside obstructions. I put this accident on the driver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerM Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 Look at the guy's pants. And what's with the dash cam on a non-law enforcement vehicle? Filming for a new "Jackass" movie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 (edited) And what's with the dash cam on a non-law enforcement vehicle? Eh, we tend to have a few cars with them every time we get together for a cruise. And this looks like it was in Russia. Dash cams there are VERY common because of rampant insurance fraud. Edited July 3, 2013 by NickF1011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gkinla Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 (edited) A four year old then asked, Daddy, why was one cow pushing the other cow across the road? NickF1011 had it correct, it's Russian. Edited July 3, 2013 by Gkinla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 A four year old then asked, Daddy, why was one cow pushing the other cow across the road? NickF1011 had it correct, it's Russian. Let Bill Clinton explain how they can use the morning after pill in 10 years. He's been known as an expert on what sex "is" and isn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted July 3, 2013 Author Share Posted July 3, 2013 Let Bill Clinton explain how they can use the morning after pill in 10 years.He's been known as an expert on what sex "is" and isn't. everything has to be political? Perhaps we should let Larry Craig explain it because he's an expert in trying to get laid in public... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 (edited) everything has to be political? Perhaps we should let Larry Craig explain it because he's an expert in trying to get laid in public... You're hoping I'll react in defense of Craig? First, I had to look him up because I haven't been concerned with him. Second, aren't you disingenuous to be tossing his name around when you are defending gays? Would've thought you would be his defender despite his party affiliation. So, fine. Ask him. Not that I'd give a crap either way. Edited July 3, 2013 by FiredMotorCompany Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
efy Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 "Defending gays?" You say that as if they're criminals for Christ's sake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 "Defending gays?" You say that as if they're criminals for Christ's sake. Someone coming in late to the conversation would jump to that conclusion. I was not "attacking" gays per se. And LH was not "defending" gays as you assumed. Those of us in this and several other discussions understood what I meant. LH, the member I addressed, made no objection to my comment, and he is best qualified to do so. Stay in the game and you can get to know where I am coming from without having to make such assumptions. There was no inference to criminal activity. Try to avoid being so sensitive. This place can be brutal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted July 13, 2013 Author Share Posted July 13, 2013 You're hoping I'll react in defense of Craig?First, I had to look him up because I haven't been concerned with him. Second, aren't you disingenuous to be tossing his name around when you are defending gays? Would've thought you would be his defender despite his party affiliation. So, fine. Ask him. Not that I'd give a crap either way. I would've thought you'd understand that I'm not going to defend someone who votes to deny rights to homosexuals while being a homosexual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.