rn4

No all you have tried to do is deflect away from what the current republican regime in the senate is trying to do.

I never said the dems didn't use it, but the republicans have put a who new meaning in the use of it to obstuct anything the senate has tried to do. Can you admit this is the most the filibuster has ever been used.

They have never used like the Republicans are using it now. I believe they have filibustered 16 job bills so far. This is what Bitch McConnell meant when he said his top priority was to make President Obama a 1 term president. The Republicans want to make sure that the economy stays in the shitter so they can regain power, pretty pathetic.

Go look up filibuster and the number of times the Republicans have used it and get back to us.

I doubt that you really are worried about the future children in America as you are your own wealth.

Yep that's the way it works, then when the end of the world comes that group gets out of paying.

What makes you so sure that you would have been able to stop the perpetrator without getting yourself killed too.

Why would you expect more dems. Texas hasn't elected a dem to statewide office since 1994.

Peer review never made a difference to the right before. Amazing it needs to be peer reviewed when it doesn't show the outcome you like. The fact is he was against before he was for it. Maybe he could be Romneys science adviser.

Richard Muller changes his mind. I bet the Koch brothers are not happy with him. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/former-climate-change-skeptic-now-says-global-warming-134617449.html

Are you dizzy from all the spinning your doing.

Actually, there are proposals to regulate Ammonium Nitrate. http://www.dhs.gov/files/laws/ammonium-nitrate-regulations.shtm http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/ammonium-nitrate-security-program.shtm

But the NRA would fight tooth and nails on any of Marks proposals.

They had a surplus because of the 1.5 Billion dollars he got from the U.S. tax payers. From NBC news. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/18/10444876-salt-lake-city-olympics-earmarks-a-double-edged-sword-for-romney?lite Although Romney spokeswoman Saul asserted that a majority of federal funding for the Olympics was for security, McCain, in leveling his charges, relied on a General Accounting Office report that documented a litany of direct and indirect federal earmarks for the Salt Lake Olympics that had little if anything to do with security. Among them: $645 million for new highways and roads, including a repaved mountain road to the Snow Basin ski resort, owned by a wealthy local oilman. There was also hundreds of millions more for light rail, parking lots, bus rentals, sewer construction, housing for the news media and weather forecasting — in addition to $161 million for security (a figure that climbed even higher after 9/11.) Sounds like the only way there was a profit was because of the federal gov.

But why would they provide it now. This will only affect the ones that don't provide it now, they will have to pay something.

Why would a business who provides coverage now and is not forced to drop their coverage and pay the $2000 dollar per head fine. Why don't they drop it know because no one is forcing them to provide coverage unless they have a labor agreement of which insurance is one of the negotiated benifits.

Here in the states there is no payroll deduction for unemployment insurance, it is payed into the system by the employer.

Whosure in case you didn't notice in Wisconsin, the republicans had 6 senators up for recall in 2011 to 3 dems. The repubs lost 2 of those, the dems none. In 2012 4 repub. sen. faced recall with 1 lossing, so the trend looks more like people are sick of the Republicans to me than the Democrats.

George Bush is already gone.

The only uneducated, are the Republican and Fox news Koolaid drinkers. Keep voting for the Koch brothers party and see were your wages are in the future. My wife and daughter will cancel your wife and son, my 2 other daughters will put us 2 up.

He also said we need to raise taxes, so I guess you'll believe that now to.

Just helps validating Dies point.

Well then either LATimes article you linked to or the Fortune article is lying or just maybe the fortune article did a little more research before they decided to publish an account of fast and furious.

The ATF couldn't intercept the weapons, they were legally purchased by the buyers which then they could resell if they so chose. This is what the ATF was investigating. They couldn't confiscate the guns after the prosecutor told them they didn't have sufficient evidence.

You really are a Richard Cranium.