stephenhawkings Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Get over it! over what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cal50 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Aces, Aces, Aces...We've been through this already. http://mediamatters.org/p/about_us/ Mediamatters.org describes themselves as "Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501©(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media." They are not dedicated to correcting liberal misinformation. They are self avowed biased liberal outlets just as bad as you accuse the right wing or Hannity or Limbaugh of being. They are not interested in presenting factual analysis of all political parties and special interests. I could care less if you buy into the slanted perspectives of this group, just please tolerate others preference to cite their own slanted perspectives. Be consistent. If they said the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor he would believe it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feegsit Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 And with all the campaiging by Bill O, Beck, Hannity and Palin the teabaggers still couldnt win upstate New York.. or the presidency. The only pattern is that these clowns may pull in the ratings but not the votes. Faux News entertainment purposes only.,.... Fox News is the reason the Republicans couldn't win the Presidency! Limbaugh (not with Fox), Hannity as well as others beat down McCain within an inch of his life in the primaries, because Romney was their candidate of choice. Lo and behold! Who wins the primary... John McCain. NOW these people are trying to back peddle and tell us what a great guy McCain is. But their impact was so great that McCain was DOA. For all intents and purposes the Republicans had no candidate. This may well have been the easiest victory the Democrats ever had. JMO.... and you know what they say about those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trimdingman Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Beck is a devout Christian? Not really. The rest of your post is absolute crap too! As usual. What's the matter? Did I trash some of your socialist gods? You are just as much a religious nut as any Bible thumper, or head nodder, or carpet kisser. If you believe that the Great Depression and the Second World War was a better outcome than what would have happened without government interference, you have some 'splaining to do, not just a moronic cheap shot. I don't care what religion Glen Beck follows. Mormon is an offshoot of Christianity. It is all based on falacies, which I have pointed out many times on this forum. My point is that I am not a follower of Glen Beck. I like a lot of what he says, but he has not turned me into anything that I wasn't already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
napfirst Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) Another great catch for Fox News...... The former Alaska governor, whose book, Going Rogue: An American Life, became a bestseller weeks before it was released and remains No. 2 on the New York Times bestseller list, has signed a multi-year deal to offer her political commentary and analysis across all Fox News platforms, including Fox Business Channel, FoxNews.com and Fox News Edited January 11, 2010 by napfirst Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 Ah yes Palin and Fox news ...a match made in Neo-con heaven. Or is it ..Dumb and Dumber part II? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Ah yes Palin and Fox news ...a match made in Neo-con heaven. Or is it ..Dumb and Dumber part II? Aces, Since you used the phrase, what is your definition of Neo-con? Don't cite anything on the net. What is the definition as you understand it and intend it in usage? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trimdingman Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 I applaud you for corrrecting these right wing loonies in their recordings of the teabaggers.. It seems these RubliCants cant think on their own, every word out of their piehole is a repeat of Hannity, Rush Or Beck. Loyal followers i guess. Keep up the good work! You are just copying what I say about all of you socialist nanny state left wing Looney Toon sheep. Socialists were in charge after the crash in 1929. There was Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Roosevelt, and Hirohito, the main players. Socialists all. The Jews were capitalists, so they were killed off, along with dissenters in the Soviet Union, and later China. This was all done under socialism. Under socialist rule, an economic downturn was manipulated into the Great Depression, and further socialist policies, including protectionism, led to World War II. That is some success story for an ideology. Over a hundred million people dead, and much of Europe and Russia and Japan laid waste. Yet, just like the blind followers of some kook religion, they still sing the praises of Socialism. The United States has so much government now that old time socialism pales in comparison, if you look at it in monetary terms. We are so far in debt that we are on the brink. The socialist solution is to borrow more. It looks like they are about to do it to us again. This time, there are a lot more nukes, and we are hooked on oil and electricity. It is going to be really bad this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 12, 2010 Author Share Posted January 12, 2010 Aces, Since you used the phrase, what is your definition of Neo-con? Don't cite anything on the net. What is the definition as you understand it and intend it in usage? The word means neo conservative or new conservative. Sorry but I don't dance for your amusement. What is your definition? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 The word means neo conservative or new conservative. Sorry but I don't dance for your amusement. What is your definition? Dance? I know it STANDS FOR neo-conservative. I was asking for your definition, i.e., what is the concept you are referring to when you use that phrase. I can look it up on Wikipedia or Merriam Webster's, I don't need that. I was asking for your definition when you use the phrase so I will not assume (I know that word is dangerous) what you are trying to say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerrymaker Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Ah yes Palin and Fox news ...a match made in Neo-con heaven. Or is it ..Dumb and Dumber part II? No that would be reid and peliso however you spell her name.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 Dance? I know it STANDS FOR neo-conservative. I was asking for your definition, i.e., what is the concept you are referring to when you use that phrase. I can look it up on Wikipedia or Merriam Webster's, I don't need that. I was asking for your definition when you use the phrase so I will not assume (I know that word is dangerous) what you are trying to say. And you got it ........neo-conservative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
napfirst Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 And you got it ........neo-conservative. This translates to - he doesn't know..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 And you got it ........neo-conservative. Ok. Try to keep up. I thought I made my question very clear but you haven't answered me. What is YOUR definition of "Neo-Conservative" as you use the term? What are the qualities that are required for someone to be considered a "neo-con" or "neo-conservative"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 Ok. Try to keep up. I thought I made my question very clear but you haven't answered me. What is YOUR definition of "Neo-Conservative" as you use the term? What are the qualities that are required for someone to be considered a "neo-con" or "neo-conservative"? Does picking at words have something to do with Fox news? That is the topic here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 (edited) Fox and Sarah. http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/134515/detail/ http://politicalhumor.about.com/b/2010/01/...ox-news-gig.htm Edited January 13, 2010 by Aces Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
napfirst Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Does picking at words have something to do with Fox news? That is the topic here. Nice dodge.......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 Nice dodge.......... That's a Chrysler product. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
napfirst Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 That's a Chrysler product. That's dodge..with a small "d"...of course you know that because you aren't capable of debating...just dodging and deflecting the questions .............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 That's dodge..with a small "d"...of course you know that because you aren't capable of debating...just dodging and deflecting the questions .............. Just like most Conservatives....no sense of humor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Does picking at words have something to do with Fox news? That is the topic here. If you use the word you should be able to define what it represents. Unless you are using talking points. You used the word. I want to know what you mean by it. Do you know what it means? As far as Fox News, you are describing people who watch or defend or discuss Fox News. You use neo-con to describe some of those people you exchange posts with. Are you gonna play Dodge Ball? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Oh forget it, Aces! It's no use trying to dig into your thought processes. You just scream, evade questions, use name calling and seem unable to answer a question. I'll look for a more worthy debate opponent. Bye! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Die Wahrheit Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Ok. Try to keep up. I thought I made my question very clear but you haven't answered me. What is YOUR definition of "Neo-Conservative" as you use the term? What are the qualities that are required for someone to be considered a "neo-con" or "neo-conservative"? Let me step in, I will give you a perfect definition of Neo-Conservative... RONALD REAGAN... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 If you use the word you should be able to define what it represents. Unless you are using talking points. You used the word. I want to know what you mean by it. Do you know what it means? As far as Fox News, you are describing people who watch or defend or discuss Fox News. You use neo-con to describe some of those people you exchange posts with. Are you gonna play Dodge Ball? Oh forget it, Aces! It's no use trying to dig into your thought processes. You just scream, evade questions, use name calling and seem unable to answer a question. I'll look for a more worthy debate opponent. Bye! Unfortunately you seem to be unable to discuss any topic's substance. Perhaps you wish to belittle others to bring them down to your level? You have not posted anything worth discussing or commenting on. The game of demanding answers from posters is just that ..a game. The Topic here is Fox News. Do you have something to say on that subject? If not please stay off the board and let others with a viewpoint post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 Worth watching Where Fox and the Tea Baggers are going. http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/11/whit...usa_the_rise_of Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.