groundassault

Probowler----I wish I could reveal my source....I would love to tell you guys....but I don't want to put anyone's job in jeopardy. If I seem like I don't know what I am talking about, or someone does not like it....tell me to shut up and I will go away.....just saying :shades: GTWannabe- Your right, the wrangler consistently breaks the 70,000 mark even before the JK and they only had the TJ. The marketing people that do the projections and thats where a lot of model decision comes from. I wish they would bring the everest here..... blksn8k2-I will find out more in the spring summer, i can ask about that then.

I dont want to say to many specifics, but it should be another 25% in fuel mileage (on top of the top mileage now). One thing I can say is that Ford is having technical difficulties with the new design......lets just say it has not been done on this scale before. I would love to blab, but someone close to me is at stake. And no, I have heard nothing of the manual transmission. While I am at it I might as well say that ford is NOT looking at a tandem axle 750, Its a dream......and thats it. But this information is now, not 6 months when markets might change. My updates only come 2-3 times a year. Thats when I get my info.....I know someone somewhere. While this person is vague, they do give me specifics in certain subjects like gas mileage etc....... How about this......Ford didn't think they could break the 40,000 units on the Bronco...thats why we don't have one. I was told "it has to be a platform that produces a 100,000 units". Chew on that for now....lol

I know I dont post much here guys, but, according to some insiders Ford is taking a second look at bringing the ranger here. There has been enough outcry apparently to have management try to find a viable way to bring it. I am not saying they are bringing it, but I guess it is being re-looked at. Just what I heard.....BTW, you will be amazed by the new F-150.

Got the FX4 Ecoboost and pull a fifth wheel ultra light. The engine has no problem getting around 17-18 MPG on the highway and its not even broken in yet. While I like the 5.0, I wanted to give new tech a try and see if its worth the hype. It is, and personally, I see no reason to go back to a V8 (ask me that when I start paying for maintenance).

Hi guys! I know I don't post that often but I am here almost everyday lurking. I need some help. I used to be able to find all the sales numbers going back to 2005 on FoMoCo and now I am unable to find any. I am writing a statistical report for my MBA and need the sales data. Can anyone please help me out? TIA Nate

I shed a tear with both the Bronco and the Mercury Messenger concepts

How low do you want the flex? I think it sits just right. Are you looking for more car like? Almost like a caprice station wagon? Curious to hear

Yea, those idiots down at Lexus that build the SC and ISC coupe and infiniti building that G convertible are practically bankrupting their company building these cars....plus no one wants them....

https://www.ford.com.br/fordcaminhoes/#C6332e this thing is pretty sweet!

http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2009-04/car-talk Here is another link to begining stages of what is a similar technology. I think that this is going down the same road. (wow, groundassault did something constructive!)

HAHA! I find it so typical of Union workers saying "why does he get more, I work too!" Remember Mulally is saving one of the largest manufacturing companies in the world, not driving a forklift or putting on lug nuts. He is compensated because he can save the company. Thats what he wants....... For those of you that say well, "why doesn't he give it back"? or "If I made 5 million then I would retire"......that is exactly the difference! He has whats known as "drive" and "motivation" to make that money. Just because you feel 5 million is acceptable doesn't mean everyone "feels" ok with that.

I understand about the heavy truck business because it would be way easier to get back into that then to go back to the tractor business. The thing that really irked me was that Henry Ford started Fordson because FoMoCo didnt want to have anything to do with tractors. He turned it into a thriving business that FoMoCo ended up absorbing. Cat, NH, and Deere have all made successful tractor business. GE is a conglomerate and makes all kinds of things from desalination plants to jet engines. It was the board that voted it out in the early 90's letting the Ford name be used to 2000. But it is a profitable business. Honda has a thriving small engine business; and while thats not the same thing, it just goes to show that it is possible. I still buy Ford Tractors, I realize it has gone the way of the Dodo, but to think that they had no brand equity by a customer buying a F-150 and a lawn tractor from the same reliable company is short sight. My dad is a AT&T higher higher and because of his Ford tractor, truck and LGT ownership he has pushed his company to Super Duties over the Silverado Heavy Duty......that is an impression. Look, I know that it is hard to have multiple successful operations, but its possible and I am still mad over it....lol

I have put this before but I will do it again......Ford killed the Bronco, tractor division (very pissed) and heavy truck division.....this is why I bought a Jeep....so did my bro and two best friends and countless other friends......

Ford is really showing who they are......Its as almost as if the whiz kids are back

The Raptor is a specialized vehicle.....The reason Jeep sold 70-90K TJs a year and even more JKs is because of versatility. You can take the top off and go to the beach, load up the camp gear and hit the trails....etc. The Raptor is for Deserts and Dunes....basically all those Cali and Arizona people. Thats why the Bronco is so missed.