Blue Oval News Says No More Verbal Abuse Will Be Allowed

[Imawhosure]

Hey, when I was young, I was naive.

 

From their threat of another ice age, I have a ton of unused winter coats, alaskan gloves, snow shoes, ski boots, skull caps, and the ever popular insulated socks.

 

Then they changed to we were going to flood!!!!

 

So out I went and got scuba gear, fins, masks, practiced holding my breath, learned how to fish.

 

And THEN it wa Y2K!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Got closets full of water, canned fruit, bunson burner, flashlights everywhere, 5000 bucks in gold to trade for goods, etc, etc.

 

Now we are all getting warm!!!!!

 

Guys, I am to old for a speedo, so I AIN't A LISTENIN NO MORE!!!!!!!!

 

Geezus-H-Christ, these guys ain't happy unless they can claim the sky is-a-fallin some kind of way!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

Not to mention, between all the things I mentioned----------->Sputnik was really an attack craft, The War of the Worlds was real, The Russians are Coming, The Russians are Coming, Aids was gonna kill 1/3 of the worlds population before the turn of the century, we really didn't land on the moon, Adolf Hitler was really a Jew, the Loch Ness Monster was reproducing, we would all suffocate because of pollution, California would fall into the ocean, Big Foot was invading Colorado, we would be out of oil by 2005, the oil well fires in Iraq would change our climate dramtically, and the list goes on, and on, and on.

 

These people purposely LOOK for something that frightens you; and when they have it, they drive it home.

 

What happened to all these things I have mentioned above that WERE in the media for different lengths of time as SCIENTIFIC problems? For you younger people, remember the 1000s of wells in Iraq on fire. Remember the news!!!!! Remember what they said would happen!!!! You can Still even access what they proclaimed the outcome would be from these fires........and in fact used THIS REASON as the excuse that we should terminate that particular war.

 

OK ECO PALS, WHERE IS YOUR LEADERS PREDICTED OUTCOME???????????

 

SOCIALISTS will try anything to make you change your behaviour, ANYTHING, tell you ANYTHING, and since you/we are not scientists, we instantly get nervous.

 

Get smart, if the outcome they want to fix it is TAX, it is a SHAM!!!!!!! The only thing a tax ever fixed was the amount of money they had to spend to make things MORE SOCIALIST.

 

Remember, if it is a TAX, it is not a solution, and never let them try and convince you it is!!!!!!!

 

Tax, solution, TAX, solution. Exactly what do those 2 things have in common?

 

 

NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Exactly. And the sooner you look at things from the perspective of what they are actually trying to do, instead of what they are telling you they need to do to help you, the better off everyone in this country is going to be!

Edited March 8, 2007 by Imawhosure

[fmccap]

Geezus-H-Christ, these guys ain't happy unless they can claim the sky is-a-fallin some kind of way!!!!!!!!!!

Not to mention, between all the things I mentioned----------->Sputnik was really an attack craft, The War of the Worlds was real, The Russians are Coming, The Russians are Coming, Aids was gonna kill 1/3 of the worlds population before the turn of the century, we really didn't land on the moon, Adolf Hitler was really a Jew, the Loch Ness Monster was reproducing, we would all suffocate because of pollution, California would fall into the ocean, Big Foot was invading Colorado, we would be out of oil by 2005, and the list goes on, and on, and on.

 

These people purposely LOOK for something that frightens you; and when they have it, they drive it home.

Hey now. I seen BIGFOOT. Also think about this. With more Loch Ness Monsters swiming around considering they are big, don't you think that would make the waters rise?

[fmccap]

Oh, don't forget about Bird Flu.

 

Didnt you guys have a swine flu in the 70's? That was a big scare and more people ended up dying from the vaccination than actually died from the disease, if there ever was one.

 

Don't forget to get your TamiFlu.

Rumsfeld's growing stake in Tamiflu

Rumsfeld isn't the only political heavyweight benefiting from demand for Tamiflu, which is manufactured and marketed by Swiss pharma giant Roche. (Gilead receives a royalty from Roche equaling about 10% of sales.) Former Secretary of State George Shultz, who is on Gilead's board, has sold more than $7 million worth of Gilead since the beginning of 2005.

The list can go on and on. It's about the elite, not us.

Edited March 8, 2007 by fmccap

[fmccap]

Posted twice.

Edited March 8, 2007 by fmccap

[Bluecon]

David Suzuki

Another GW hypocrite.

 

"Suzuki: Mean and not so green

What's more, I am 99% certain that I have a smaller carbon footprint than Suzuki. My only home is much smaller than his beach-front mansion in Vancouver. I know that because as a teen and young adult, my friends and I used to party on said beach and sometimes saw Suzuki wander about in his yard.

 

During an editorial board meeting here in Calgary several years ago, I mentioned to Suzuki I used to see him at his huge home and he asked "which house?" He's got more than one! "

 

http://calsun.canoe.ca/News/Columnists/Cor...07/3708299.html

 

The number one Canadian environmental crackpot is Maurice Strong.

 

"Strong, now 77, is best known as the godfather of the environmental movement, who served from 1973-1975 as the founding director of the U.N. Environment Program (UNEP) in Nairobi. UNEP is now a globe-girdling organization with a yearly budget of $136 million, which claims to act as the world’s environmental conscience. Strong consolidated his eco-credentials as the organizer of the U.N.’s 1992 environmental summit in Rio de Janeiro, which in turn paved the way for the controversial 1997 Kyoto Treaty on controlling greenhouse gas emissions."

 

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/rosett020807.htm

[Trimdingman]

So you don't think coming up with homegrown technologies that could one day ween us off Middle East oil one day would be worth it? Probably a lot cheaper in many ways than wars and making people like the Saudi's incredibly rich.

 

Just look at people who have installed solar panels on their rooftops, yes it is very expensive to do now, but the tech is constantly improving, and those panels will eventually pay for themselves. We could sell our tech to the rest of the world as well. Since when was technological innovation a bad thing? If it was, why would Ford or any other manufacturer strive to make improvements? And have things like fuel injection or crumple zones been bad for business?? Even if the climate had nothing to do with it, wouldn't it be nice to reduce pollution?

We can at least try, and I think the people who come up with new "green" technologies are going to be raking in the cash, I can't see why not?

Politicians might not, scientists for the most part do. Who is taking our money and acquiring power? "scientists"? Right now big oil is taking our money, and they have incredible power over governments, that's the threat people should be concerned over. In some cases, like here in the states, big oil and our executive branch are virtually indistinguishable..

 

 

I don't see any former Greenpeace members in the white house, too bad their aren't..

 

 

My point is, if the earth is warming to the extent that the fearmongers say, and serious flooding is imminent, then it is too late to do anything about it. It is like handing out bailing cans to the Titanic passengers. We have to get to higher ground, and abandon any areas which will soon be under water. Is that what the enviro-whackos say that we should do? No; because there wouldn't be anything in it for them, except lynch mobs when the water failed to rise as they predicted.

Edited March 8, 2007 by Trimdingman

[fmccap]

Now that is the first sensible post to date from those that do not believe in "climate change". I never heard of this, and look forward to watching it. I really do have an open mind.

Just wondering if you watched this and what you thought. The fact that only 51 of 2500 scientists were actually seen on the IPCC report also. My mind is also open, just wondering your thoughts.

[napfriend]

New Record LOW Temps!

[Savetheplanet]

P.S. Oh yes it does...........because that is exactly what you are suggesting we do.

 

You can deny it all you want, but the fact of the matter is-------------->you want to make the majority without anywhere near a proven case, and bend them to your and your minioritys will.

 

So then, you name the adjective you would like to describe yourself as!!!!!!!

 

Pick a good one, cause after every dictator, communist leader, and socialist wannabees transcripts already have been translated to the English language, I am sure we can show THOSE EXACT WORDS HAVE ALREADY BEEN USED.........by them, to point out they were trying to save something, somebody, or somewhere!!!!! And you see what that has already gotten us into, and excuse the hell out of all of us if we aren't going to let it happen again, lololololol!!!!!!

 

 

 

 

Are you talking about the Iraq war cause that post sure sounds like it.

 

You must admit there has to be some type of regulation in place for the environment. It just seems that every time the US has tried to pass sensible legislation the ppl who are afraid of change get up in arms about it. Examples might include the Catylitic converter, floro carbon's, the clean water act, the clean air act, CAFE, etc.

 

And blueblood makes a good point in that the ones with the money making agenda is big oil and coal companies, I really don't see how all these scientific acadamies thruout the world are going to reap anywhere near the profits Exxon will.

You guy's have used the cooling theory of a few scientist's from the 70's as a reason why you don't believe the new reasearch on GCC. Today, you have a widespread scientific consensus, supported by national academies and all the major scientific institutions, solidly behind the warning that the temperature is rising, anthropogenic CO2 is the primary cause, and it will worsen unless we reduce emissions.

 

In the 1970s, there was a book in the popular press, a few articles in popular magazines, and a small amount of scientific speculation based on the recently discovered glacial cycles and the recent slight cooling trend from air pollution blocking the sunlight. There were no daily headlines. There was no avalanche of scientific articles. There were no United Nations treaties or commissions. No G8 summits on the dangers and possible solutions. No institutional pronouncements. You could find broader "consensus" on a coming alien invasion.

Edited March 8, 2007 by Savetheplanet

[Imawhosure]

New Record LOW Temps!

 

Man Napfriend,

 

These eco people have never faced such an all out "TRUTH" offensive by so many people. The majority has finally opened its mouth to show utter disdain, or down right contempt for their contrived ideas.

 

It is about time they realize they are not even close to 50%, and if they try an end around towards socialism, people much more eloquent than us with the written and spoken word will be there to greet them, sending their sky is falling theories down in flames worse than what we have.

 

As long as they are confronted by people who are willing to debate the issue by trying to disprove their unproven science and exaggerated counts of scientists who claim it is our fault, they have a forum. They throw up countless articles, to the same amount of mundane articles we can toss up there, making the debate static; giving them a backhanded victory of sorts because nothing was solved, therefore there must be something to their claims.

 

But as soon as the political aspect and who supports their causes is brought to light, they are instantly on the defensive. And this TRUTH is an obvious one and easy one to prove, not like their truth gotten to by convoluting the facts.

 

If they wish to support a form of socialism and wealth transfer, this is a free country and none of us should have a problem with them pursuing their desires. I support their right to do it; just as I am sure they support our collective right to point out that SOCIALISTS are the leaders of these groups, made most of these groups, and are still in control of the vast majority of them. So, there should be no problem with what all of us are pointing out!!!!! Is there?????????????????

[Savetheplanet]

Man Napfriend,

 

These eco people have never faced such an all out "TRUTH" offensive by so many people. The majority has finally opened its mouth to show utter disdain, or down right contempt for their contrived ideas.

 

It is about time they realize they are not even close to 50%, and if they try an end around towards socialism, people much more eloquent than us with the written and spoken word will be there to greet them, sending their sky is falling theories down in flames worse than what we have.

 

As long as they are confronted by people who are willing to debate the issue by trying to disprove their unproven science and exaggerated counts of scientists who claim it is our fault, they have a forum. They throw up countless articles, to the same amount of mundane articles we can toss up there, making the debate static; giving them a backhanded victory of sorts because nothing was solved, therefore there must be something to their claims.

 

But as soon as the political aspect and who supports their causes is brought to light, they are instantly on the defensive. And this TRUTH is an obvious one and easy one to prove, not like their truth gotten to by convoluting the facts.

 

If they wish to support a form of socialism and wealth transfer, this is a free country and none of us should have a problem with them pursuing their desires. I support their right to do it; just as I am sure they support our collective right to point out that SOCIALISTS are the leaders of these groups, made most of these groups, and are still in control of the vast majority of them. So, there should be no problem with what all of us are pointing out!!!!! Is there?????????????????

 

 

you know I read a lot of newspapers, the WSJ included, which is not exactly a bastian of the liberal press, and I have spent a fair amount of time reading blogs on GCC.

But I can't remember seeing anything like what you guy's are talking about. Transfer of wealth?? Socialist's are the leaders of ALL the groups that believe in GCC??

 

Your theory is not so much distubing as it is amusing!!

[J-150]

Are you talking about the Iraq war cause that post sure sounds like it.

 

You must admit there has to be some type of regulation in place for the environment. It just seems that every time the US has tried to pass sensible legislation the ppl who are afraid of change get up in arms about it. Examples might include the Catylitic converter, floro carbon's, the clean water act, the clean air act, CAFE, etc.

 

And blueblood makes a good point in that the ones with the money making agenda is big oil and coal companies, I really don't see how all these scientific acadamies thruout the world are going to reap anywhere near the profits Exxon will.

You guy's have used the cooling theory of a few scientist's from the 70's as a reason why you don't believe the new reasearch on GCC. Today, you have a widespread scientific consensus, supported by national academies and all the major scientific institutions, solidly behind the warning that the temperature is rising, anthropogenic CO2 is the primary cause, and it will worsen unless we reduce emissions.

 

In the 1970s, there was a book in the popular press, a few articles in popular magazines, and a small amount of scientific speculation based on the recently discovered glacial cycles and the recent slight cooling trend from air pollution blocking the sunlight. There were no daily headlines. There was no avalanche of scientific articles. There were no United Nations treaties or commissions. No G8 summits on the dangers and possible solutions. No institutional pronouncements. You could find broader "consensus" on a coming alien invasion.

 

\

 

BS.

 

Al Gore is making a killing with movie and book.

 

Not to mention the speaking tour.

 

 

Same with zealots like David Suzuki.

 

 

You have these multi-millionaires living in mansions flying around in provate jets telling us to cut back.

 

And sheep like you believe it.

[DukeNukem]

Something for you guys to think about:

Most,if not all GCC "activists" are funded by socialst/One World Government types. Look at the people doing the pushing.

In a socialist society there are 2 classes, the working class and the ruling class. The people pushing all this crap have no intention of being in the working class, so going socialst would be great for them.

These people beleive that you are too stupid to live your own life so they need to save you from yourself. And all you guys here who support the GCC theory, they consider you stupid as well but they need you for the time being to get what they want. Once they get it they will drop you like a dirty diaper.

 

Do dirty diapers contibute to global warming??

 

Socialist agenda hmmmm!

 

"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices.... Government has to make those choices for people"

(From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 20 - Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous taxpayer-funded health care plan)

[Savetheplanet]

\

 

BS.

 

Al Gore is making a killing with movie and book.

 

Not to mention the speaking tour.

Same with zealots like David Suzuki.

You have these multi-millionaires living in mansions flying around in provate jets telling us to cut back.

 

And sheep like you believe it.

 

 

Ok, you named two, one of them,m Al Gore has always had money and lot's of it, I am pretty sure he could rake in even more money playing the stock market than he can promoting GCC.

So how will Methos, Blueblood and I become wealthy from our belief in GCC?

[fmccap]

Ok, you named two, one of them,m Al Gore has always had money and lot's of it, I am pretty sure he could rake in even more money playing the stock market than he can promoting GCC.

So how will Methos, Blueblood and I become wealthy from our belief in GCC?

You won't. You will make the sheepherders rich.

[fmccap]

Ok, you named two, one of them,m Al Gore has always had money and lot's of it, I am pretty sure he could rake in even more money playing the stock market than he can promoting GCC.

So how will Methos, Blueblood and I become wealthy from our belief in GCC?

Here's a third.DiCaprio Heats up Global Warming with New Film Documentary

[Bluecon]

\

 

BS.

 

Al Gore is making a killing with movie and book.

 

Not to mention the speaking tour.

Same with zealots like David Suzuki.

You have these multi-millionaires living in mansions flying around in provate jets telling us to cut back.

 

And sheep like you believe it.

No more verbal abuse will be allowed? Please apologize to the sheep.

[Bluecon]

Ok, you named two, one of them,m Al Gore has always had money and lot's of it, I am pretty sure he could rake in even more money playing the stock market than he can promoting GCC.

So how will Methos, Blueblood and I become wealthy from our belief in GCC?

Stalin called the peons, 'useful idiots'.

what was in it for the average communists? Nothing. They waited in breadlines and Stalin lived in great luxury.

[fmccap]

you know I read a lot of newspapers, the WSJ included, which is not exactly a bastian of the liberal press, and I have spent a fair amount of time reading blogs on GCC.

explain why the earth WARMED after the last ice-age with no SUVS around! THEN maybe we will believe you have a CLUE of what is going on now!

Edited March 8, 2007 by fmccap

[napfriend]

explain why the earth WARMED after the last ice-age with no SUVS around! THEN maybe we will believe you have a CLUE of what is going on now!

Cow farts!

[Bluecon]

And blueblood makes a good point in that the ones with the money making agenda is big oil and coal companies, I really don't see how all these scientific acadamies thruout the world are going to reap anywhere near the profits Exxon will.

What happened to Blueblood? After I asked him to specifically tell us what we can do to save the earth he disappeared. Maybe you can answer the question.

 

You guy's have used the cooling theory of a few scientist's from the 70's as a reason why you don't believe the new reasearch on GCC. Today, you have a widespread scientific consensus, supported by national academies and all the major scientific institutions, solidly behind the warning that the temperature is rising, anthropogenic CO2 is the primary cause, and it will worsen unless we reduce emissions.

 

The temperature of the earth is not so simple that it can be explained by the small amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.

And it even appears he spends the taxpayers money, which appears to be the litmus test.

 

"When he accepted the prestigious 2006 Crafoord Prize, Wallace S. Broecker, a member of the National Academy of Sciences and universally deemed the world's foremost climate interpreter, said, "My lifetime study of Earth's climate system has humbled me. I'm convinced that we have greatly underestimated the complexity of this system. The importance of obscure phenomena, ranging from those that control the size of raindrops to those that control the amount of water pouring into the deep sea from the shelves of the Antarctic continent, makes reliable modeling very difficult, if not impossible." "

 

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/caruba013107.htm

 

In the 1970s, there was a book in the popular press, a few articles in popular magazines, and a small amount of scientific speculation based on the recently discovered glacial cycles and the recent slight cooling trend from air pollution blocking the sunlight. There were no daily headlines. There was no avalanche of scientific articles. There were no United Nations treaties or commissions. No G8 summits on the dangers and possible solutions. No institutional pronouncements. You could find broader "consensus" on a coming alien invasion.

This is why the pro global warming people want to stifle debate. More and more info coming out to dispute the greenhouse gas theory. This info is not from the 1970s'. Lots more where that came from.

 

"Global Warming: The momentum has shifted to climate skeptics"

 

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming030307.htm

 

"Claude Allegre, one of France's leading socialists and among her most celebrated scientists, was among the first to sound the alarm about the dangers of global warming.

 

In the 1980s and early 1990s, when concern about global warming was in its infancy, little was known about the mechanics of how it could occur, or the consequences that could befall us. Since then, governments throughout the western world and bodies such as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have commissioned billions of dollars worth of research by thousands of scientists. With a wealth of data now in, Dr. Allegre has recanted his views. To his surprise, the many climate models and studies failed dismally in establishing a man-made cause of catastrophic global warming. Meanwhile, increasing evidence indicates that most of the warming comes of natural phenomena. Dr. Allegre now sees global warming as over-hyped and an environmental concern of second rank."

 

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/st...05-fc28f14da388

 

The 'Deniers of global Warming'. The mainstream press finally is showing a little balance.

Very interesting is the "Will the Sun Cool Us" part VII.

 

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/st...3d-f181196a6d71

 

Statistics needed -- The Deniers Part I

Warming is real -- and has benefits -- The Deniers Part II

The hurricane expert who stood up to UN junk science -- The Deniers Part III

Polar scientists on thin ice -- The Deniers Part IV

The original denier: into the cold -- The Deniers Part V

The sun moves climate change -- The Deniers Part VI

Will the sun cool us? -- The Deniers Part VII

The limits of predictability -- The Deniers Part VIII

Look to Mars for the truth on global warming -- The Deniers Part IX

Limited role for C02 -- the Deniers Part X

Edited March 8, 2007 by Bluecon

[fmccap]

www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research

The average temperature in February 2007 was 32.9 F. This was -1.8 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 34th coolest February in 113 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.3 degrees Fahrenheit per decade.

[Bluecon]

you know I read a lot of newspapers, the WSJ included, which is not exactly a bastian of the liberal press, and I have spent a fair amount of time reading blogs on GCC.

But I can't remember seeing anything like what you guy's are talking about. Transfer of wealth?? Socialist's are the leaders of ALL the groups that believe in GCC??

 

Your theory is not so much distubing as it is amusing!!

Sowell has a good column on global warming.

 

"Global hot air"

 

"Back in the 1970s, the environmental hysteria was about the dangers of a new ice age. This hysteria was spread by many of the same individuals and groups who are promoting today's hysteria about global warming.

 

It is not just the sky that is falling. Government money is falling on those who seek grants to study global warming and produce "solutions" for it. But that money is not as likely to fall on those skeptics in the scientific community who refuse to join the stampede.

 

Yes, Virginia, there are skeptics about global warming among scientists who study weather and climate. There are arguments both ways — which is why so many in politics and in the media are so busy selling the notion that there is no argument.

 

If you heard both arguments, you might not be so willing to go along with those who are prepared to ruin the economy, sacrificing jobs and the national standard of living on the altar to the latest in an unending series of crusades, conducted by politicians and other people seeking to tell everyone else how to live."

 

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell021307.php3

[Savetheplanet]

*Yawn*

[fmccap]

*Yawn*

Why can't you answer any questions? You have not proven anything.

 

P.S. You want to make money off these fools? Go buy A/C company stocks and A/C units while they are cheap. Be prepared for when they drop the bomb after our first 100 degree day. Fear will set out across the country and everyone will be running out to get A/C units. You will be able to multiply your money many times.