McCain Camp Hiding Palin From Sunday News Shows

[RangerM]

No hypocrisy there...

 

2 individuals. 2 individual positions.

 

Nope. No hypocrisy there. None.

[mulewright]

In the interest of full disclosure.

 

The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, co-sponsored by U.S. Sens. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla., requires the government to set up a free, searchable Web site listing all entities receiving federal grants, contracts or other monetary awards of $25,000 or more.

 

The Lugar-Obama Nuclear Non-proliferation and Conventional Weapons Threat Reduction Act expands U.S. cooperation to destroy conventional weapons. It also expands the State Department's ability to detect and interdict weapons and materials of mass destruction. Basically it provides funding for destruction of conventional, and un-conventional weapons.

 

The first sets up a website, and the second is essentially a re-hashing of a previous bill. But admittedly they were passed into law.

 

I don't find them terribly compelling. Your opinion obviously differs.

 

There was little opposition to either, Bush supported them.

 

But... I have to admit that Obama may be right when he says electing him will improve our standing in the world.. :shades:

http://www.newsmax.com/insider_report/Iran...?utm_medium=RSS

Edited September 9, 2008 by mulewright

[Mark B. Morrow]

There was little opposition to either, Bush supported them.

 

But... I have to admit that Obama may be right when he says electing him will improve our standing in the world.. :shades:

http://www.newsmax.com/insider_report/Iran...?utm_medium=RSS

 

 

Citing Newsmax is just the flipside of citing DailyKos.

[RaZor]

What do you think . . . who will this hurt?

 

LINK

 

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/sign...}&dist=hppr

Edited September 9, 2008 by RaZor

[RangerM]

What do you think . . . who will this hurt?

 

LINK

 

WARNING! Perhaps a false alarm, but my antivirus balked at this link. Something about malicious code.

 

You may want to cut-n-paste the text of the article.

[Pioneer]

My AV gave no warning.

 

<H1 class=storytitle id=StoryContent_TopPageNavigation_Headline>Significant New Information Details CIA Criminal Culpability in Allowing the 9/11 Attacks!</H1>

Last update: 3:18 p.m. EDT Sept. 8, 2008WASHINGTON, Sept 08, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Palo Alto Publishing will hold a press conference on September 11, 2008, at 9 AM at the National Press Club at 529 14th St. NW, Washington D.C., to detail new information revealed since the release of the 9/11 Commission Report. Entirely sourced from government reports, court documents, and the account of FBI Agent Ali Soufan, this analysis, never before fully detailed, shows that CIA officers, working through liaisons at FBI Headquarters, had repeatedly and criminally obstructed investigations that could have prevented the attacks on 9/11.

 

This book details the numerous times the CIA interacted with the FBI. In particular, the times lead FBI Cole investigator, Ali Soufan, made several official requests to the CIA: one through FBI Director Freeh, asking for any information the CIA had on an al Qaeda meeting in Kuala Lumpur and on Khallad Bin Attash, (at that time thought to be mastermind on the Cole bombing).

 

Despite the fact that the CIA did indeed have this information, they either denied its existence or refused to respond to Soufan's requests. The CIA withheld material information from an ongoing FBI investigation, which was a crime, and not due to the fact that "the CIA did not talk to the FBI", as suggested by the 9/11 Commission report. In July 2001, emails between high-level CIA managers and CIA officers, entered into evidence in the Moussaoui trial, indicated that Mihdhar was going to take part in the next big al Qaeda attack. When these CIA officers requested permission to transfer this information to the FBI, they were denied. Yet, at almost the same time, CIA Director Tenet was holding meetings at the White House describing a huge al Qaeda attack about to take place inside of the US.

 

On August 22, 2001, when the CIA discovered that both Mihdhar and Hazmi were in the US, the CIA knew they were here to take part in a huge al Qaeda attack. Yet, the CIA, working with FBI IOS agents at FBI HQ, sabotaged the last chance FBI Cole investigators would have to investigate Mihdhar and prevent the attacks on 9/11. The CIA concealed the photograph of Khallad taken at Kuala Lumpur that connected Mihdhar to the planning of the Cole bombing. FBI HQ agents also concealed the fact that they had received the NSA release from the NSA caveats the very day they told the FBI Cole investigators they were forbidden from investigating Mihdhar, due to NSA caveats. FBI HQ agents then fabricated a NSLU ruling, and told the FBI Cole investigators that the NSLU had ruled they were not allowed to be part of any investigation for Mihdhar when in fact the NSLU attorneys had ruled just the opposite, and stated to FBI IG investigators that the Cole investigators could have been part of the investigation for Mihdhar, since the NSA information had no FISA component. [9/11 Commission report, Footnote 81, p 581] This new information shows that almost 3000 innocent people in the US paid, with their lives, for the actions at the CIA and FBI HQ, actions that should have been uncovered by the 9/11 Commission, using the very same new information, easily obtainable with their subpoena powers.

 

This criminal activity was carried out by individuals at the CIA Bin Laden unit, the CIA Yemen station, high level managers at the CIA, who prevented the transfer of information regarding the Kuala Lumpur meeting to the FBI investigators, the FBI Bin laden unit, the FBI RFU and even by the Director of the FBI.

 

All of this new information is detailed in "Prior Knowledge of 9/11" at www.eventson911.com by Robert Schopmeyer, owner of an EDA software company in Silicon Valley. SOURCE Palo Alto Publishing

[Floyd Lawson]

Who is McCain going to owe?

The McCain-Lobbyist Connection

 

And for those of you that think being

makes McCain qualified to be Pres

You'll also hear about his McNasty reputation. My question to you is do we really want someone that can "go off like a roman candle" with the power to push the red button? LINK

 

And for those that think that bringing up Rev Wright is a good tactic, you might to search on youtube for "Palin - church" (frankly, I don't think where one goes to church is a valid agrument).

 

But there is:

 

Sarah and Todd Palin are former members of the Alaskan Independence Party, whose motto is "Alaska First — Alaska Always."

 

The controversy is over how hard the party has pushed for independence from the United States. But it gets a whole lot better than that.

 

According to Lynette Clark, a top party official, the Palins were members in 1994, and attended the party's statewide convention, in Wasilla, that year. Sarah Palin quit the party in 1996 in order to run for mayor of Wasilla; there is no indication of when she first joined.

 

Why are these dates important? Because party founder Joe Vogler, who was chairman right up until his death in 1993, was a "sulphurous" presence known for his "'America be damned' rhetoric delivered at D-9-cat decibels," according to an Anchorage Daily News editorial published in 1998.

 

America be damned? Gee, who does that remind you of? And could the Palins have been ignorant of Vogler's views in 1994?

To this day, the Alaskan Independence Party's Web site proudly carries the following quote from Vogler: "I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions." And Tapper found that Palin had sent a video message to the party's annual convention just last year.

 

Doesn't sound like the McCain campaign (and Steve Schmidt) are going to be able to bring up Wright anymore lest they open up this can of worms.

 

It will also be interesting to see how McCain/Palin handle this little fact (the Queen of pork barrel) and the fact that he had criticized her 3 times in recent times. Is this what he meant by, "... and I'll let you know who they are . . . and make their names famous?" (or something to that effect).

 

The debates should be interesting.

You need to check facts get in your way.

[96towncarcartier]

Let's see...

 

In the state senate, Obama voted THREE TIMES to keep infanticide LEGAL...

 

Thats the procedure where a baby is born ALIVE...then carried to a closet full of SOILED linen (urine, feces) and left alone TO DIE... sometimes it took minutes...sometimes it took hours...

 

The baby got a birth certificate...and a death certificate.

 

Obama SUPPORTS infanticide.

 

At a recent rally in March 2008... Obama said ...

 

"I have two daughters... if one of them made a mistake...they shouldn't be punished with a baby"

 

THIS IS THE MENTALITY OF THIS EGO-MANIAC. Having a baby is a PUNISHMENT???

 

And remember...his campaign of "change" really IS NOT CHANGE AT ALL.

 

It's the same liberal crap that has been shoved upon us for decades... More taxes, Less Trade, More government control in our lives, more government regulation, windfall taxes on big oil (Jimmy Carter's mantra...remember the gas shortages of the 70's?)

 

Where is the change? Does Obama REALLY think that we'll vote for a selfish egomaniac just to prove some issue on race???

 

 

 

Thanks for the history on McCain. Now how about filling in the blanks for Obama. Tell us about him sitting in Wright's church for 20 years, you remember, "God Damn America", or tell us about Bill Ayers or his communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. There's more!

[fmccap]

To this day, the Alaskan Independence Party's Web site proudly carries the following quote from Vogler: "I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions." And Tapper found that Palin had sent a video message to the party's annual convention just last year.

 

Doesn't sound like the McCain campaign (and Steve Schmidt) are going to be able to bring up Wright anymore lest they open up this can of worms.

 

It will also be interesting to see how McCain/Palin handle this little fact (the Queen of pork barrel) and the fact that he had criticized her 3 times in recent times. Is this what he meant by, "... and I'll let you know who they are . . . and make their names famous?" (or something to that effect).

 

The debates should be interesting.

 

You need to check facts get in your way.

Can I get an answer like that? That's right, I give you FACTS and you ignore them. You guys love this soap opera crap they give you to much, maybe that's the real problem?

[mulewright]

I have even less respect for flip-flop McCain now, after the Palin nom.

 

 

http://thepoliticalcurmudgeon.blogspot.com/

 

Alaskans Speak (In A Frightened Whisper):

Palin Is "Racist, Sexist, Vindictive, And Mean"

September 5, 2008

by Charley James -

 

"So Sambo beat the bitch!"

 

This is how Republican Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin described Barack Obama's win over Hillary Clinton to political colleagues in a restaurant a few days after Obama locked up the Democratic Party presidential nomination.

 

According to Lucille, the waitress serving her table at the time and who asked that her last name not be used, Gov. Palin was eating lunch with five or six people when the subject of the Democrats’ primary battle came up. The governor, seemingly not caring that people at nearby tables would likely hear her, uttered the slur and then laughed loudly as her meal mates joined in appreciatively.

 

"It was kind of disgusting," Lucille, who is part Aboriginal, said in a phone interview after admitting that she is frightened of being discovered telling folks in the "lower 48" about life near the North Pole.

 

Then, almost with a sigh, she added, "But that's just Alaska."

 

Racial and ethnic slurs may be "just Alaska" and, clearly, they are common, everyday chatter for Palin.

 

Besides insulting Obama with a Step-N'-Fetch-It, "darkie musical" swipe, people who know her say she refers regularly to Alaska's Aboriginal people as "Arctic Arabs" - how efficient, lumping two apparently undesirable groups into one ugly description - as well as the more colorful "mukluks" along with the totally unimaginative "f**king Eskimo's," according to a number of Alaskans and Wasillians interviewed for this article.

 

But being openly racist is only the tip of the Palin iceberg. According to Alaskans interviewed for this article, she is also vindictive and mean. We're talking Rove mean and Nixon vindictive.

 

No wonder the vast sea of white, cheering faces at the Republican Convention went wild for Sarah: They adore the type, it's in their genetic code. So much for McCain's pledge of a "high road" campaign; Palin is incapable of being part of one.

 

Tough Getting People Who Know Her to Talk

It's not easy getting people in the 49th state to speak critically about Palin - especially people in Wasilla, where she was mayor. For one thing, with every journalist in the world calling, phone lines into Alaska have been mostly jammed since Friday; as often as not, a recording told me that "all circuits are busy" or numbers just wouldn't ring. I should think a state that's been made richer than God by oil could afford telephone lines and cell towers for everyone.

 

On a more practical level, many people in Alaska, and particularly Wasilla, are reluctant to speak or be quoted by name because they're afraid of her as well as the state Republican Party machine. Apparently, the power elite are as mean as the winters.

 

"The GOP is kind of like organized crime up here," an insurance agent in Anchorage who knows the Palin family, explained. "It's corrupt and arrogant. They're all rich because they do private sweetheart deals with the oil companies, and they can destroy anyone. And they will, if they have to."

 

"Once Palin became mayor," he continued, "She became part of that inner circle."

 

Like most other people interviewed, he didn't want his name used out of fear of retribution. Maybe it's the long winter nights where you don't see the sun for months that makes people feel as if they're under constant danger from "the authorities." As I interviewed residents it began sounding as if living in Alaska controlled by the state Republican Party is like living in the old Soviet Union: See nothing that's happening, say nothing offensive, and the political commissars leave you alone. But speak out and you get disappeared into a gulag north of theArctic Circle for who-knows-how-long.

 

Alright, that's an exaggeration brought on by my getting too little sleep and building too much anger as I worked this article. But there's ample evidence of Palin's vindictive willingness to destroy people she sees as opponents. Just ask the Wasilla town administrator she hired before firing him because he rebelled against the way Palin demanded he do his job, or the town librarian who refused to hold the book burning Walpurgisnacht Mayor Palin demanded.

 

Ironically, Palin was pushed into hiring the administrator by the party poobahs who helped get her elected after she got herself into trouble over a number of precipitous firings which gave rise to a recall campaign.

 

"People who fought her attempt to oust the librarian are on her enemies list to this day," states Anne Kilkenny, a Wasilla resident and one of the few Alaskans willing to speak on-the-record, for attribution, about Palin. In fact, Kilkenny actually circulated an e-mail letter about Palin that was verified and printed by The Nation.

 

For good measure, Palin booted the Wasilla police chief from office because, she told a local newspaper, he "intimidated" her.

 

Running on Extreme Fringe Evangelical Views

Sarah Palin drew early attention from state GOP apparatchiks when, during her first mayoral campaign, she ran on an anti-abortion platform. Normally, political parties do not get involved in Alaskan municipal elections because they are nonpartisan. But once word of her extreme fringe evangelical views made its way to Juneau, the state capitol, state Republicans tossed some money behind her campaign.

 

Once in office, Palin set out to build a machine that chewed up anyone who got in her way. The good, Godly Christian turns out to be anything but.

 

"She's doesn't like different opinions and she refuses to compromise," Kilkenny notes. "When she was mayor, she fought ideas that weren't hers. Worse, ideas weren't evaluated on their merits but on the basis of who proposed them."

 

Sound familiar? Palin may well be Dick Cheney's reincarnate.

 

Something else has a familiar Republican ring to it: Her tax policies, and a "refund surpluses but borrow for the future" attitude.

 

According to Kilkenny and others in Wasilla as well as Juneau, Palin reduced progressive property taxes for businesses while mayor and increased a regressive sales tax which even hits necessities such as food. The tax cuts she promoted in her St. Paul speech actually benefited large corporate property owners far more than they benefited residents. Indeed, Kilkenny insists that many Wasilla home owners actually saw their tax bill skyrocket to make up for the shortfall. Two other Wasillian's with whom I spoke said property taxes on their modest, three bedroom homes rose during the Palin regime.

 

To an outsider, it would seem hard to do, but an oil-rich town with zero debt on the day she was inaugurated mayor was left saddled with $22 million of debt by the time she moved away to become governor - especially since nothing was spent on things such as improving the city's infrastructure or building a much-needed sewage treatment plant. So what did Mayor Palin spend the taxpayer's money on, if not fixing streets and scrubbing sewage?

 

For starters, she remodeled her office. Several times over, as a matter of fact.

 

Then Palin spent $1 million on an unnecessary, new park that no one other than the contractors and Palin seemed to want. Next, Sarah doled out more than $15 million of taxpayer money for a sports complex that she shoved through even though the city did not own clear title to the land; now, seven years later, the matter is still in litigation and lawyer fees are said to be close to at least half of the original estimated price of the facility.

 

She also worked hard to get voters approval of a $5.5 million bond proposal for roads that could have been built without borrowing. Anchorage may not be the center of the financial universe but, like good Republicans everywhere, Sarah Palin knows how to please Alaskan bankers and bond dealers.

 

For good measure, she turned Wasilla into a wasteland of big box stores and disconnected parking lots.

 

Sarah Barracuda

En route to the governor's igloo, Palin managed to land what Anne Kilkenny says is the plumb political appointment in the state: Chair of Alaska's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (OGCC), a $122,400 per year patronage slot with no real authority to do anything other than hold meetings. She took the job despite having no background in energy issues and, as it turned out, not liking the work.

 

"She hated the job," an OGCC staff member who is not authorized to speak with the news media told me. "She hated the hours and she hated what little work there was to do. But she couldn't figure out a way to get out of the thing without offending Gov. Murkowski" and the state Republican Party regulars, some of whom were pissed off they didn't get appointed.

 

But ever the opportunist, Palin quickly concocted a way. First, she waged a campaign with the local news media claiming that the position was overpaid and should be abolished - despite the fact that she lobbied Murkowski hard to get it. Then, mounting what she saw as a white horse, Palin raised a cloud of dust by resigning from the OGCC and riding away with an undeserved reputation as a "reformer."

 

But when a local reporter dared to suggest that the reformer Empress has no clothes, Palin tried to get her fired.

 

"She came at me like I was trying to steal her kids," said the targeted reporter, who now works for an oil company in Anchorage. "I heard she had a wild temper and vicious mean streak but it's nothing like you can imagine until she turns it on you."

 

Not surprising since some of her high school classmates still openly call her "Sarah Barracuda," Kilkenny insists.

 

Still, as a Republican Party hack Palin managed to get herself elected running under the false flag of a "reformer."

 

And what did she bring to the job? No legislative experience other than a city council of a village of 5,000 people, which is smaller than some high schools in Chicago. Little hands-on supervisory or managerial experience; after all, she needed to hire a city administrator to run Wasilla. No executive experience, except for almost being recalled as mayor. A philosophy of setting public policy based on one word: No.

 

And what has she done since winning the job?

 

According to Kilkenny, nothing. Well, nothing other than suggesting the state's multi-multi-million dollar, oil-generated surplus be distributed to residents and finance future state needs by borrowing money. Gee, doesn't that sound precisely what George Bush did with the surplus he inherited from Bill Clinton in 2001 and we all know in what great shape Bush's economic policies left the nation.

 

It may explain why, when asked by reporters, including me, what she thought about Palin being picked to be McCain's running mate, her mother-in-law replied with a sardonic, "What has Sarah done to qualify her to be vice president?" Of course, when the woman - said by many I spoke with to be well-respected in Wasilla - was running to succeed Palin as mayor, Sarah refused to endorse her, so that may explain the family tension.

 

As Governor, Palin gave the legislature no direction and budget guidelines, according to the chair of a legislative committee. But then she staged a huge grandstand play of line-item vetoing countless projects, calling them pork. "They were restored because of public outcry and legislative action," the aide said. "She vetoed them mostly because she had no idea what they were or why they were important."

 

But it was enough to get the McCain, who is mostly unobservant of the world around him anyway, to think Palin has a reputation as being "anti-pork".

 

In fact, Juneau observers note that Palin kept her hand stuck out as far as anyone for pork ladled out by indicted Sen. Ted Stevens. She only opposed the "bridge to nowhere" after it became clear that it would be politically unwise to keep supporting it, these same insiders assert. Then, Palin fell back on her old habits and publicly humiliated him for pork-barrel politics.

 

As for being "ready on day one" to be commander in chief, despite the repeated public claims she's made, the Alaska National Guard commander said that, "she has made no command decisions, other than sending some troops to help fight a few brush fires and march in parades at county fairs."

 

"Sambo Beat the Bitch"

"Palin is a conniving, manipulative, a**hole," someone who thinks these are positive traits in a governor told me, summing up Palin's tenure in Alaska state and local politics.

 

"She's a bigot, a racist, and a liar," is the more blunt assessment of Arnold Gerstheimer who lived in Alaska until two years ago and is now a businessman in Idaho.

 

"Juneau is a small town; everybody knows everyone else," he adds. "These stories about what she calls blacks and Eskimos, well, anyone not white and good looking actually, were around long before she became a glint in John McCain's rheumy eyes. Why do I know they're true? Because everyone who isn't aboriginal or Indian inAlaska talks that way."

 

"Sambo beat the bitch" may be everyday language up in the bush. Whether it - and the outlook, politics and worldview Palin reflects when she says such things in public - should be part of a presidential campaign is another thing altogether. The comment says as much about McCain as it does about Palin, and it says a lot of things about Americans who overlook such statements (as well as her record) and vote anyway for McCain.

 

Charley James is an American journalist, author and essayist who lives in Toronto.

Reprinted with permission from The Progressive Curmudgeon

Earlier articles by Charley:

"Bush Lied, They Died" Draws a Drunken Punch

Placid Lake Woebegon Begets a Nasty Police State

Edwards The Confessor vs. McCain's Ongoing Philandering

 

Evevn CNN was calling this nonsense, just more B/S from the dailykos

[RangerM]

Evevn CNN was calling this nonsense, just more B/S from the dailykos

 

My favorite website is/was "retardedbaby.com". The site was taken down but here is the cache.

Edited September 10, 2008 by RangerM

[Floyd Lawson]

Can I get an answer like that? That's right, I give you FACTS and you ignore them. You guys love this soap opera crap they give you to much, maybe that's the real problem?

No!

I've read a few of your post on here and it's clear you back Ron Paul. I looked at him early on and there are some things I like about him but more that I don't (I won't go there right now). You advocate a departure from the 2 party system, a lot of people do, however this is where my confusion comes in.

 

If as you say you want change why then are you so against the candidate that is so much alike Ron Paul from a political ideology standpoint? For sake of argument lets say that Obama wins, that takes the political landscape far to the left, along with that comes universal health care, higher taxes, and more government intervention into ours private lives. Then in 4 years you be backing another 3rd party guy who is right of center and their chances of getting elected will be worse that Paul's are this year.

 

For that there are only a couple on conclusions that I can come to:

You are really a closet Obama supporter

You are mad because the party rejected Ron Paul so you want McCain to lose

 

Either way it doesn't take much commitment to play your game. You have no dog in the fight so you never have to take a position or defend one. You are always asking some obscure question that you already know the answer to in an attempt trip someone up and show how intelligent your are. So why don't you take a break and come back after you mature a little.

[fmccap]

No!

I've read a few of your post on here and it's clear you back Ron Paul. I looked at him early on and there are some things I like about him but more that I don't (I won't go there right now). You advocate a departure from the 2 party system, a lot of people do, however this is where my confusion comes in.

 

If as you say you want change why then are you so against the candidate that is so much alike Ron Paul from a political ideology standpoint? For sake of argument lets say that Obama wins, that takes the political landscape far to the left, along with that comes universal health care, higher taxes, and more government intervention into ours private lives. Then in 4 years you be backing another 3rd party guy who is right of center and their chances of getting elected will be worse that Paul's are this year.

 

For that there are only a couple on conclusions that I can come to:

You are really a closet Obama supporter

You are mad because the party rejected Ron Paul so you want McCain to lose

 

Either way it doesn't take much commitment to play your game. You have no dog in the fight so you never have to take a position or defend one. You are always asking some obscure question that you already know the answer to in an attempt trip someone up and show how intelligent your are. So why don't you take a break and come back after you mature a little.

McCain is no where near Paul.

 

Why do you call it an obscure question??? I think of it as to the point on real issues. I'm not trying to show anything about myself, all I want is for people to pay attention just a little. Find out the real issues and ignore both parties clouding of them so they don't have to deal with them face to face.

[Floyd Lawson]

McCain is no where near Paul.

 

Why do you call it an obscure question??? I think of it as to the point on real issues. I'm not trying to show anything about myself, all I want is for people to pay attention just a little. Find out the real issues and ignore both parties clouding of them so they don't have to deal with them face to face.

yada yada yada. You need to grow up and stop acting like a child that doesn't get it's way.

[DUCKRACER]

So, who will Obama owe?

MoveOn.org

[fmccap]

yada yada yada. You need to grow up and stop acting like a child that doesn't get it's way.

LOL Great mature answer.

[Floyd Lawson]

LOL Great mature answer.

Do us both a favor, just ignore my post, I'm not going to answer your obscure and off-the-wall questions anyway.

[fmccap]

Do us both a favor, just ignore my post, I'm not going to answer your obscure and off-the-wall questions anyway.

Is ignorance bliss???

[Imawhosure]

Ummmm, does anyone think that Sarah Palin looks LIKE A PIG WITH LIPSTICK?

 

Seems, maybe Mr Obama does. Nice guy, that one, lolol. Picking on a girl!!!!! What a man, what a leader, and not on policy but LIPSTICK, lololol.

 

Now maybe I can be crass, and maybe you can be crass, but should a Presidential candidate be crass?

 

I dunno, you can think he wasn't talking about her, BUT JESSE JACKSON JR says he was. Who am I to argue with the essence of the REVERENDS JACKSONS loins?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! He is a great leader, isn't he fellas!!!!!!

 

Whatch think women are going to see this as? Oh whoa is me, oh whoa is you, oh whoa is us, oh whoa there dudes and dudettes, don't you dare put a piece of tape over the MESSIAHS mouth, we all need to hear his exact, profound, intelligent, EXPERIENCED words, lololololol.

 

It is just to good, I can't believe it!!!!!!! We couldn't have written a script better than this. And besides picking Palin, Mcain hasn't had to do anything yet, hehehehehehe. Just watch what is coming. By the time it is over, even liberals will want Barry..........er, I mean Barack to go away.

[Pioneer]

Seems, maybe Mr Obama does. Nice guy, that one, lolol. Picking on a girl!!!!!

 

 

He wasn't even referring to Palin when he made the remark.

[P71_CrownVic]

Let's see...

 

In the state senate, Obama voted THREE TIMES to keep infanticide LEGAL...

 

Thats the procedure where a baby is born ALIVE...then carried to a closet full of SOILED linen (urine, feces) and left alone TO DIE... sometimes it took minutes...sometimes it took hours...

 

The baby got a birth certificate...and a death certificate.

 

Obama SUPPORTS infanticide.

 

At a recent rally in March 2008... Obama said ...

 

"I have two daughters... if one of them made a mistake...they shouldn't be punished with a baby"

 

THIS IS THE MENTALITY OF THIS EGO-MANIAC. Having a baby is a PUNISHMENT???

 

And remember...his campaign of "change" really IS NOT CHANGE AT ALL.

 

It's the same liberal crap that has been shoved upon us for decades... More taxes, Less Trade, More government control in our lives, more government regulation, windfall taxes on big oil (Jimmy Carter's mantra...remember the gas shortages of the 70's?)

 

Where is the change? Does Obama REALLY think that we'll vote for a selfish egomaniac just to prove some issue on race???

 

So you are saying Obama is Pro-Choice? Good...

 

The government should have NO CHOICE what women do with their bodies. For one, there are WAY too many people in this world already. Second, you don't miss what you don't have. Third, what happens when a women gets raped? Having a child because of rape is most certainly punishment.

 

Not to mention that if a woman accidentally gets pregnant, her and her significant other probably haven't made the substantial life changes to accommodate this child...there fore the child suffers.

 

Euthanasia should be legal as well.

[Floyd Lawson]

He wasn't even referring to Palin when he made the remark.

So you were there?

[Pioneer]

So you were there?

 

Better. I have Internet access.

 

Obama accuses McCain camp of phony outrage on lipstick comment

“Obama used the reference as he criticized McCain’s policies as similar to those of Bush, saying: “You can put lipstick on a pig. It’s still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still going to stink after eight years.”

[RangerM]

Better. I have Internet access.

 

Obama accuses McCain camp of phony outrage on lipstick comment

 

While I agree that the 'outrage' is over the top, and I agree that Obama was not specifically referring to Palin, I do believe the audience made the connection, wrongly, based on their reaction.

 

I think you could say the audience's reaction to the "lipstick" comment was inspired by Palin, given that she and her pitbull comment were the focus of the news for the last week, but Obama was not referring to her. He is the victim of his own supporters.

[fmccap]

It is just to good, I can't believe it!!!!!!! We couldn't have written a script better than this.

Then you will love this. Biden seems to be the one with a better script.

Biden: Hillary a Better Pick Than Me

"Make no mistake about this," Biden responded. "Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Let’s get that straight. She’s a truly close personal friend, she is qualified to be president of the United States of America, she’s easily qualified to be vice president of the United States of America, and quite frankly, it might have been a better pick than me. But she’s first rate, I mean that sincerely, she’s first rate, so let’s get that straight."