macattak1 Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Link Not my choice for a SCJ... Peace and Blessings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprinter Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 La Raza meaning of 'separation of southwestern states' translates to the land being repatriated back to Mexico. They are truly a "hate group" that advocates killing of Americans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edstock Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Gosh I hope the anti-O crowd can do better than this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macattak1 Posted May 28, 2009 Author Share Posted May 28, 2009 Gosh I hope the anti-O crowd can do better than this. I just want a SCJ that looks at the constitution as it was written. And not a living document. I really prefer that they are not part of some hate group, extremest club, etc. I want a well rounded, even keeled, SCJ that is not going to be an activist judge. Sure, we will get some of that no matter what. But we don't have to go and find them from roster lists of the KKK, La Raza, or any other exclusionary group. If she is not then I only have to be concerned with her Living Constitution and Activist positions. Peace and Blessings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 Gosh I hope the anti-O crowd can do better than this. When I first saw the thread title I thought "Ford is building a new Super Cobra Jet in Mexico??" :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edstock Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 When I first saw the thread title I thought "Ford is building a new Super Cobra Jet in Mexico??" :lol: A SCJ from the new 5 liter sounds like a great idea, they can build it anywhere they want, even Australia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edstock Posted May 28, 2009 Share Posted May 28, 2009 I just want a SCJ that looks at the constitution as it was written. And not a living document. I want a well rounded, even keeled, SCJ that is not going to be an activist judge. There may be no "well rounded, even keeled" candidates for the SC that look at the Constitution "as it was written", as a dead document, and not a living document. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macattak1 Posted May 28, 2009 Author Share Posted May 28, 2009 When I first saw the thread title I thought "Ford is building a new Super Cobra Jet in Mexico??" :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem12 Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 I just want a SCJ that looks at the constitution as it was written. And not a living document. I really prefer that they are not part of some hate group, extremest club, etc. I want a well rounded, even keeled, SCJ that is not going to be an activist judge. Sure, we will get some of that no matter what. But we don't have to go and find them from roster lists of the KKK, La Raza, or any other exclusionary group. If she is not then I only have to be concerned with her Living Constitution and Activist positions. Peace and Blessings She is a member of La Raza, and she will be a liberal SCJ. Hello Gun control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macattak1 Posted May 30, 2009 Author Share Posted May 30, 2009 She is a member of La Raza, and she will be a liberal SCJ. Hello Gun control. And apparently she will be a better judge then some white guy cause she has had so many experiences in her life. So, minorities can not be racist and now they have more experiences in life compared to a white man. I wonder how many more experiences a female black/hispanic growing up in Harlem has compared to a white guy? That must be like 4+ times more experiences then the white guy huh? Peace and Blessings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suv_guy_19 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 And apparently she will be a better judge then some white guy cause she has had so many experiences in her life. She was speaking specifically to issues of culture and ethnicity when she made that statement. She also said that she hoped she would be a better judge of such issues. She also followed up by saying that it didn't mean that white males couldn't understand, or something to that effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suv_guy_19 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 She is a member of La Raza, and she will be a liberal SCJ. Hello Gun control. Huh? She's replacing a Liberal. It really changes nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DUCKRACER Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 (edited) Huh? She's replacing a Liberal. It really changes nothing. FOR NOW. BO has 4 (or 8, God Forbid) years to pack the SC with America hating racist liberals. Edited May 30, 2009 by DUCKRACER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpd80 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 La Raza meaning of 'separation of southwestern states' translates to the land being repatriated back to Mexico. They are truly a "hate group" that advocates killing of Americans So, California going back to the Mexicans would be a bad thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macattak1 Posted May 30, 2009 Author Share Posted May 30, 2009 So, California going back to the Mexicans would be a bad thing? Ouch. That hurts. I played hockey last night and took a slap shot to the chest. Laughing makes it hurt even more! Peace and Blessings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macattak1 Posted May 30, 2009 Author Share Posted May 30, 2009 She was speaking specifically to issues of culture and ethnicity when she made that statement. She also said that she hoped she would be a better judge of such issues. She also followed up by saying that it didn't mean that white males couldn't understand, or something to that effect. So she thinks that because she is of one culture she would be better because white men have no culture? Or is that what you are implying? Fail to see how one can blanket statement that they would be a better judge of something then a whole other group of people. Kind of puts her in her own little...what should we call it...? Peace and Blessings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suv_guy_19 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 She has said that she should have used better words when saying what she did. I don't think she's a racist, but I think she did not speak clearly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem12 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 Huh? She's replacing a Liberal. It really changes nothing. The libereal she is replacing would look like a conservative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsonlu Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 La Raza meaning of 'separation of southwestern states' translates to the land being repatriated back to Mexico. They are truly a "hate group" that advocates killing of Americans Funny. I have had many law school classmates who belonged to La Raza. They advocated nothing of that sort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suv_guy_19 Posted May 30, 2009 Share Posted May 30, 2009 The libereal she is replacing would look like a conservative. It doesn't seem that way from listening to either right or left wing radio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprinter Posted June 1, 2009 Share Posted June 1, 2009 Funny. I have had many law school classmates who belonged to La Raza. They advocated nothing of that sort. Funny, I think you don't know what you are talking about. Step 1, remove head from a$$ This is from a left wing pro La Raza site: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupPr...e.asp?grpid=153 Immigration: NCLR strives "to encourage immigration policies that are fair and nondiscriminatory, to encourage family reunification, and to enact necessary reforms to the current immigration system." In short, it favors amnesty for illegals already residing in the U.S., and open borders henceforth. In La Raza's calculus, any restriction on the free movement of immigrants constitutes a violation of their civil rights, and any reduction in government assistance to illegal border-crossers is "a disgrace to American values." Thus La Raza supports continued mass Mexican immigration to the United States, and hopes to achieve, by the sheer weight of numbers, the re-partition of the American Southwest as a new state called Aztlan -- to be controlled by its alleged rightful owners, the people and government of Mexico. La Raza is also a sponsoring organization of the Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride Coalition, which seeks to secure ever-expanding rights and civil liberties protections for illegal immigrants, and policy reforms that diminish or eliminate future restrictions on immigration. At many of the "pro-immigration" rallies that NCLR members have attended in recent times, their signature slogan has been: "La Raza unida nunca sera vencida!" ("The united [Hispanic] race will never be defeated!") http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=50459 http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=44501 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/janua...exicangangs.htm http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/...Latino_KKK.html http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2008/dec...ged-gang-murder http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9...ow_article=1%22 http://www.nbc-2.com/articles/readarticle....&z=3&p= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.