Versa-Tech Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 I was just wondering, since the Democrat party is still in complete denial that they have lost the 2012 Presidential Election, what kind of lies and excuses do you expect them to tell when the results come out? Furthermore, how much financial damage will incur, and how many people will die when the psychotic fringe (>1% of the D party) resort to riotting and domestic terrorism? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerM Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 It's not over until November 7. Overconfidence breeds complacency. Even though Obama's likely to lose North Carolina, I'm not letting it stop me from voting absentee. Remember, Scott Walker was supposed to lose and John Kerry was supposed to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Honestly. Either way the results go, which side do you foresee erupting into violence and/or rioting including damaging private property and assault? Tea Party members or Obama's Base? I see possible rioting from the same group...win or lose. Look what happens when the home team WINS in sports!!!!!!! Kentucky 2012 Lakers NBA win 2010 MLB Giants win World Series Here is a comparison of Tea Party ( supporters of a constitutional government) vs. Occupy Wall Street (darlings of the left) And in general, which group is more likely to be as obsessed with sports? How many reports of violence, larceny, attacks and other destructive behavior have we seen at conservative gatherings vs. liberal? Think back to the National Conventions from the 60's and 70's. 1968 DNC, Can you honestly demonstrate that, sans agent provocateurs, republicans, conservative or Tea Party minded citizens are likely to riot, even if they did lose this election? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 I was just wondering, since the Democrat party is still in complete denial that they have lost the 2012 Presidential Election, what kind of lies and excuses do you expect them to tell when the results come out? Furthermore, how much financial damage will incur, and how many people will die when the psychotic fringe (>1% of the D party) resort to riotting and domestic terrorism? A wake up call for your happy ass. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 A wake up call for your happy ass. That's so funny. You and your ilk are adamant that they have the edge, are likely to win, are ahead in the polls, that Gallup is an outlier. So, I suppose you are saying Romney is Truman? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 That's so funny. You and your ilk are adamant that they have the edge, are likely to win, are ahead in the polls, that Gallup is an outlier. So, I suppose you are saying Romney is Truman? Your reading comprehension sucks. It should be obvious what i'm saying but your trying to be purposely stupid I guess. Me? I haven't made a prediction like you and your ilk here did. the Democrat party is still in complete denial that they have lost the 2012 Presidential Election Your projecting his lack of logic on me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Your reading comprehension sucks. It should be obvious what i'm saying but your trying to be purposely stupid I guess. Me? I haven't made a prediction like you and your ilk here did. Your projecting his lack of logic on me. Oh, my reading comprehension is quite good. I think there are at least a few others on this board who understood the point. You? Not so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Oh, my reading comprehension is quite good. I think there are at least a few others on this board who understood the point. You? Not so much. There are no points in your circular logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 There are no points in your circular logic. I can't make you see what you refuse to believe exists. Denial seems to work for you, so enjoy your little world. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 I can't make you see what you refuse to believe exists. Denial seems to work for you, so enjoy your little world. Here's some sage advice for you. Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth....There is no spoon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 I'm still laughing that you don't realize the significance of the picture. Harry Truman the incumbent Democrat, who many believed had already lost the election is holding up a paper with the headline that he lost after he beat the Republican challenger who was supposed to win. We could even go into the Trib's conservative history and slant. Do you understand why I posted that in reply to his comment? Or are you out there in LaLa land talking about what someone somewhere that I am not discussing is saying? Yes, i'm aware that it's from Chicago and to you that means some sort of something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 (edited) I'm still laughing that you don't realize the significance of the picture. Harry Truman the incumbent Democrat, who many believed had already lost the election is holding up a paper with the headline that he lost after he beat the Republican challenger who was supposed to win. We could even go into the Trib's conservative history and slant. Yes! That is what I knew about the photo. Polls have generally shown Obama in the lead and his supporters refused to accept the Gallup poll showing Romney's gains. Your comment with the photo did not specify who you were attributing Truman's equivalent was. I took the opportunity to point out that the photo could be used to show Obama as Dewey. Do you understand why I posted that in reply to his comment? Or are you out there in LaLa land talking about what someone somewhere that I am not discussing is saying? Yes, i'm aware that it's from Chicago and to you that means some sort of something. Versa-Tech, on 19 October 2012 - 04:49 PM, said: I was just wondering, since the Democrat party is still in complete denial that they have lost the 2012 Presidential Election, what kind of lies and excuses do you expect them to tell when the results come out? Furthermore, how much financial damage will incur, and how many people will die when the psychotic fringe (>1% of the D party) resort to riotting and domestic terrorism? Versa-Tech remarked on the Democrat party's denial that they had lost the election. You post the photo to claim democrats were Truman, thereby confirming Versa-Tech, and in doing so confirming his assertion. I saw the irony that Romney was Truman due to the democrat party's denial. Humorous. Let's try Algebra. Harry Truman the incumbent Democrat, Mitt Romney, who many believed had already lost the election is holding up a paper with the headline that he lost after he beat the Republican challenger the incumbent Democrat who was supposed to win. We could even go into the Trib's conservative history and slant. Edited October 23, 2012 by FiredMotorCompany Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted October 24, 2012 Share Posted October 24, 2012 Versa-Tech remarked on the Democrat party's denial that they had lost the election. You post the photo to claim democrats were Truman, thereby confirming Versa-Tech, and in doing so confirming his assertion. I saw the irony that Romney was Truman due to the democrat party's denial. Humorous. Obama is Truman, Versa-tech is the Tribune and Romney is Dewey in this situation. It's pretty simple. A Conservative proudly declaring ahead of time that the Democrat lost to the republican Challenger. It's really quite simple, no need for silly attempts at word math. Let's try Algebra. Harry Truman the incumbent Democrat, Mitt Romney, who many believed had already lost the election is holding up a paper with the headline that he lost after he beat the Republican challenger the incumbent Democrat who was supposed to win. We could even go into the Trib's conservative history and slant. Hmmm, that's algebra? Looks more like semantics. Now when Parts comes along and says that Romney has already lost feel free to use the picture, but in the context of this discussion your entirely wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted October 24, 2012 Share Posted October 24, 2012 It's useless to try to convince you the Earth is round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 As Election Day nears, Obama supporters step up riot threats @_SweetKiWi If Mitt Romney wins, imma start a riot!— Ganja Nish.✌ (@_SweetKiWi) November 02, 2012 And the left called the Tea Party promoters of violence? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cal50 Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Could be a time to thin the herd. They better be careful what they wish for or threaten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 The silence from the left is deafening. Evidently they are embarrassed by their "Base" voters. Working at a "Base" level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
probowler Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Wasn't it the occupy Wall street movement that was occupied by vandals and rapists? I don't recall anyone being raped at a tea party event. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 The silence from the left is deafening. Evidently they are embarrassed by their "Base" voters. Working at a "Base" level. I'm sorry. It took a while for me to respond once I realized that you were serious, because I was actually rolling on the floor laughing my ass off. All 15 people on twitter are going to start a riot? :chairshot: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 I'm sorry. It took a while for me to respond once I realized that you were serious, because I was actually rolling on the floor laughing my ass off. All 15 people on twitter are going to start a riot? :chairshot: Win or lose, the violence will come. Individual incidents aside, I expect it WILL be riots in the streets. Cars burned, storefronts crashed, bystanders assaulted. Buildings set afire. This is what they do when their Basketball team wins or Halloween!!!??? It won't be Tea Party or Republicans. And I dare say it will be some faction of the left rather than any faction of the right. I'd rather be proved wrong than right. But your laughing at the possibility seems like a veiled attempt to defend your fellow liberals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprinter Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 It will happen. Detroit hasn't had a good riot for a couple of years now. Chicago and Los Angles with the restrictive liberal gun laws, another good place to riot. They do have a little common sense. Don't want to get your @ss blown away by your neighbors where they can protect their property. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.