cal50 Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Ouch! Wow! You got me there. I just didn't recall these people having been called "Adolph Hitler and Saddam Hussein".BTW, where'd you get the crappy photoshoped photo of Saddam here at the bottom? Rule of Photoshop#1 You have to make the shadows match. I am a photographer and I look at light much more closely than amateurs do. Most novices cannot visualize the difference between hard light and soft light. That's the tell here. BTW, hasn't other administration's representatives greeted foreign leaders with a hand shake? As opposed to bowing in submission? Swing and a miss. Maybe he has pics of the JFK, Elvis and Hitler all hanging out together alive and well ? (That's a pretty weak & funny Photoshop job but enough to fool the gullible & stupid.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 Ouch! Wow! You got me there. I just didn't recall these people having been called "Adolph Hitler and Saddam Hussein".BTW, where'd you get the crappy photoshoped photo of Saddam here at the bottom? Rule of Photoshop#1 You have to make the shadows match. I am a photographer and I look at light much more closely than amateurs do. Most novices cannot visualize the difference between hard light and soft light. That's the tell here. BTW, hasn't other administration's representatives greeted foreign leaders with a hand shake? As opposed to bowing in submission? Swing and a miss. Google. Wow, you really showed me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 24, 2013 Author Share Posted September 24, 2013 As usual you are missing the point...forget what I believe....do you agree with his comments about socialism?..... did you ride the short bus to school? He didn't miss the point and he's not going to answer your question just like he still can't figure out how to use the words your and you're correctly among the myriad of other grammar and reasoning errors that he makes here all the time. Why do you guys insist on engaging Langston? He is a low intelligence drone who spews liberal talking points. You will never help him to understand the failure of liberalism because he believes in it with all his heart and soul. It is his god. If he had to actually face the fact that liberalism is failure and a lie and just closet socialism it would shatter his self image and his world view. He wouldn't know what do with himself. For him the act of debating the rest of you in defense of his liberal belief system is a means to reassure himself that he is right and the rest of us are wrong. This is evident in his regular attemtps to try and paint all conservatives as racist, homophobes who are filled with hate and malice. It is a textbook indicator. If you can't disagree with someone based on logic and reason, demonize them with lies and propaganda. But in his heart he knows that liberalism has failed time and again just as he knows that Obama has had a failure of a Presidency. But to actually openly admit it to any of you is a thought he just can't come to grips with. Better to make excuses and defend the indefensible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 24, 2013 Share Posted September 24, 2013 He didn't miss the point and he's not going to answer your question just like he still can't figure out how to use the words your and you're correctly among the myriad of other grammar and reasoning errors that he makes here all the time. Why do you guys insist on engaging Langston? He is a low intelligence drone who spews liberal talking points. You will never help him to understand the failure of liberalism because he believes in it with all his heart and soul. It is his god. If he had to actually face the fact that liberalism is failure and a lie and just closet socialism it would shatter his self image and his world view. He wouldn't know what do with himself. For him the act of debating the rest of you in defense of his liberal belief system is a means to reassure himself that he is right and the rest of us are wrong. This is evident in his regular attemtps to try and paint all conservatives as racist, homophobes who are filled with hate and malice. It is a textbook indicator. If you can't disagree with someone based on logic and reason, demonize them with lies and propaganda. But in his heart he knows that liberalism has failed time and again just as he knows that Obama has had a failure of a Presidency. But to actually openly admit it to any of you is a thought he just can't come to grips with. Better to make excuses and defend the indefensible. Wow, all that and the only thing you got right was not a damn thing. As for the grammar I've told you before that i'm not making the effort. I was a conservative who converted to liberalism after being shown the error of the my conservative ways. Now I disagree with you based solely on logic and reason while you present only ideological beliefs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 25, 2013 Author Share Posted September 25, 2013 Wow, all that and the only thing you got right was not a damn thing. As for the grammar I've told you before that i'm not making the effort. I was a conservative who converted to liberalism after being shown the error of the my conservative ways. Now I disagree with you based solely on logic and reason while you present only ideological beliefs. And yet you still refuse to answer napfirst's question. You're a drone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted September 25, 2013 Share Posted September 25, 2013 Wow, all that and the only thing you got right was not a damn thing. As for the grammar I've told you before that i'm not making the effort. I was a conservative who converted to liberalism after being shown the error of the my conservative ways. Now I disagree with you based solely on logic and reason while you present only ideological beliefs. You admit to being wrong twice. Converting to liberalism and falling for the liberal propaganda that guilted you into becoming a liberal. If you were Catholic you could pray for forgiveness and redemption. They work with guilt often. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 25, 2013 Author Share Posted September 25, 2013 You admit to being wrong twice. Converting to liberalism and falling for the liberal propaganda that guilted you into becoming a liberal. If you were Catholic you could pray for forgiveness and redemption. They work with guilt often. And he still hasn't answered napfirst's question. Because he's a drone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 (edited) And he still hasn't answered napfirst's question. Because he's a drone. That's funny. I'm called a drone by one of the wind up talking points dolls. Just pull the string on your back and out comes any one of a few conservative talking points. Then there's your buddies, the conservative bobble heads who just nod along and like every talking point you regurgitate. Edited September 26, 2013 by Langston Hughes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 26, 2013 Author Share Posted September 26, 2013 That's funny. I'm called a drone by one of the wind up talking points dolls. Just pull the string on your back and out comes any one of a few conservative talking points. Then there's your buddies, the conservative bobble heads who just nod along and like every talking point you regurgitate. And yet you still haven't answered napfirst's question, . . . drone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 And yet you still haven't answered napfirst's question, . . . drone. It's called deflection and mis-direction. Make a statement, and it become a conversation regarding the speakers personality. Banter and bickering back and forth without addressing the original comment. Works well in the political arena. And here if you let it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 26, 2013 Author Share Posted September 26, 2013 It's called deflection and mis-direction. Make a statement, and it become a conversation regarding the speakers personality. Banter and bickering back and forth without addressing the original comment. Works well in the political arena. And here if you let it. Oh I'm well aware. That is exactly what he's doing. We all know his game front and back. But I'll just keep reminding him that he still hasn't answered napfirst's question because he's a drone and having to come to grips with the fact that the democrat party is just a bunch of socialists is not something he can handle or openly admit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edstock Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 the fact that the democrat party is just a bunch of socialists is not something he can handle or openly admit. It's all about perspective. The fact that the republic party is just a bunch of fascists is not something you can handle or openly admit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 26, 2013 Author Share Posted September 26, 2013 (edited) It's all about perspective. The fact that the republic party is just a bunch of fascists is not something you can handle or openly admit. Fascism -- ( sometimes initial capital letter ) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism. Suppressing oppostion? Like maybe the IRS scandal? The power of the federal government suppressing those that liberal democrats didn't agree with. I think someone needs to educate himself about what fascim really is. Regimenting industry? Like maybe the medical industry via Obamacare? Or the auto industry or the coal industry? These are all hallmarks of liberal democrats. Regulating commerce? Like maybe forcing every American to buy health insurance even if they don't want it. Who gets the nod for that? Oh yes, the democrats again. Racism? You mean like labeling all white people as racist by the likes of Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson, who happen to be democrats? Yes, we know who the facists are. Edited September 26, 2013 by BlackHorse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 26, 2013 Share Posted September 26, 2013 Oh I'm well aware. That is exactly what he's doing. We all know his game front and back. But I'll just keep reminding him that he still hasn't answered napfirst's question because he's a drone and having to come to grips with the fact that the democrat party is just a bunch of socialists is not something he can handle or openly admit. LOL. You mean that someone keeps pulling the string and you keep saying the same thing. I wish that the Obama administration was acting socialist, but it's not. You forget that i'm to the left of the admin on fiscal matters. The last person's word i would take for it is Alan Grayson. He's just a another rabid talking head, the left's version of Allen West. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 26, 2013 Author Share Posted September 26, 2013 LOL. You mean that someone keeps pulling the string and you keep saying the same thing. I wish that the Obama administration was acting socialist, but it's not. You forget that i'm to the left of the admin on fiscal matters. The last person's word i would take for it is Alan Grayson. He's just a another rabid talking head, the left's version of Allen West. As predicted, you are unable to face reality in this matter. Either that or you know that admitting the truth that the democrat party is just a bunch of socialists will not help their cause so you have to pretend that its not true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 As predicted, you are unable to face reality in this matter. Either that or you know that admitting the truth that the democrat party is just a bunch of socialists will not help their cause so you have to pretend that its not true. The democratic party is not a bunch of socialists. Its made up of mostly of the center left. They look like socialists to people like you who are so far to the right. And as expected i answered the question only to be told my feeling on socialism is wrong by a non-socialist. Funny how that works. I'm much more socialist than the Obama admin and yet you tell me i'm not. Whatever dude, that's why i don't answer these questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 27, 2013 Author Share Posted September 27, 2013 I never said that you're not a socialist Langston. I believe that you absolutely are a socialist. I also know that the democrat party is absolutely socialist which is why you support them. I coudln't care less if you want to accept that reality or not. It is reality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 I never said that you're not a socialist Langston. I believe that you absolutely are a socialist. I also know that the democrat party is absolutely socialist which is why you support them. I coudln't care less if you want to accept that reality or not. It is reality. No, it's your view from the far end of the right. To you everything on the left looks socialist, but it is not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 27, 2013 Author Share Posted September 27, 2013 No, it's your view from the far end of the right. To you everything on the left looks socialist, but it is not. No they're socialists. Just becuase you can't bring yourself to admit it is of no interest to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 No they're socialists. Just becuase you can't bring yourself to admit it is of no interest to me. If it was of no interest to you then you wouldn't be arguing the point would you? Since I admit that I'm to the left of most Democrats and the DNC itself why would i be unwilling to admit if they were socialist? I don't see socialism as a bad thing, you do. Therefore if they were really socialists then i'd be really happy and willing to spread that joy. However they are not and probably never will be. And the reason I support the Democrats is that they are not Republicans. I'd prefer a labor party or even a viable socialist party but it's not going to happen so i stay with the center left because they are not the far right republicans. The Democrats get my vote by default, not by winning it. I have two choices, the idiots on the far right or the slightly less idiotic ones on the center left, so i vote for the lesser of two evils, the center left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 27, 2013 Author Share Posted September 27, 2013 (edited) I'm not arguing any point. I'm simply pointing out reality. Whether or not you can accept it or admit it is of no interest to me. The democrat party is a bunch of socialists. You are a socialist. There is nothing to argue there, it simply is. Edited September 27, 2013 by BlackHorse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 27, 2013 Share Posted September 27, 2013 You are indeed arguing the point, but please feel free to convince yourself otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackHorse Posted September 28, 2013 Author Share Posted September 28, 2013 There is no point to argue. You might as well try to deny that the sky is blue. The democrat party is a bunch of socialists. Your inability to comprehend or otherwise admit this is irrelevant. It is a fact. Sky is blue Democrats are socialists. See how easy that is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Hughes Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 There is no point to argue. You might as well try to deny that the sky is blue. The democrat party is a bunch of socialists. Your inability to comprehend or otherwise admit this is irrelevant. It is a fact. Sky is blue Democrats are socialists. See how easy that is? I do believe that we see the sky as blue, but from there your perception of the left is skewed based on your far right beliefs. Everything is socialism to a person who is that far right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiredMotorCompany Posted September 29, 2013 Share Posted September 29, 2013 I do believe that we see the sky as blue, but from there your perception of the left is skewed based on your far right beliefs. Everything is socialism to a person who is that far right. So what is it that you don't like about socialism? Too far right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.