Jump to content

2.7 vs 3.0 vs 3.5 engines


Recommended Posts

Good day all. I have lost track of the architectural history and evolution of the 3.5, the 2.7, and finally the current 3.0 V-6 Ecoboost units we find in the current Explorer ST.

 

So, is the current 3.0 a de(bored/stroked) version of the 3.5? Or, is the 3.0 an enlarged 2.7? If I recall, there were some significant differences between the 2.7 & 3.5 when the 2.7 was first introduced. Any insight will be greatly appreciated.

 

 

 

 

Edited by marksboss
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had all 3 of these engines in various vehicles although my 3.5 was the first gen version.    The 3.5 has very little, if anything, in common with the 2.7 and 3.0 Nano engines.    The Nano engines, although smaller, produce good power due primarily to higher boost in most applications.   I have the 2.7 in my F150 and it is amazingly capable for such a small engine.    It actually gets better mileage than the 3.0 that I had in a Continental in spite of the truck being heavier and less aerodynamic.   Of course, the 10 speed transmission with the .64 overdrive helps the mileage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...