akirby

While we’re at it get rid of the ridiculously outdated DOT lighting regulations.

China’s battery costs are vastly different in part due to govt subsidies.

This is a chance at a clean sheet to create a low priced platform probably starting with C2. The question is how much of the infrastructure can be clean sheet vs having to reuse the old stuff that was highly inefficient.

That’s past even the Ford ESP which is typically 7 years.

You mean like Bronco and Bronco Sport? That would never work…..😎

6 seater? Not unless the two in back are headless.

Bronco, Bronco EV and Bronco EREV. Or some other trim names to distinguish them. Looks like the same body/styling.

True. 😎

I believe him but we won’t know if it’s working for another 1-2 years.

It measures actual defects not customer satisfaction.

Nautilus ICE is way more powerful in addition to aerodynamics.

And just as many folks are buying the hybrid for max performance as for fuel economy. Definitely a win/win.

EREV is a range extender, not a PHEV. You still have to charge the batteries just not as often.

Do you have a diesel? Those might be different.

The article you quoted implies you can replace a 1.5 turbo with a NA 1.5 hybrid. But most hybrids are 2.5 Atkinson cycle for max mpg and a 1.5 Atkinson cycle won’t have enough power even with hybrid assist.