rmc523

Is that a good or a bad thing?

While what you said about Explorer being changed is true, Ford could've done more and can be doing more right now. Stylistically, I like the current Explorers, and we're stuck w/ it's design until the new unibody model arrives. Powertrain-wise, I think Ford needs to find a way to replace the Explorer's aging (and not very fuel efficient) V6. They should try to get the 3.5L in there. I suppose the new model isnt that far off though, so at this point, it'd be a waste of time, money, and effort to try.

You have to remember that the current F-150 is will only be 4-5 model years (depending on the way you look at it) old when it's replaced, which is very quick in the truck world. I'd say all new sheetmetal, new interior, engine upgrades/new engines (at launch/following launch), new options (tailgate step new post-cab bed step, integrated trailer brake system,....etc.) is a pretty significant upgrade for a 4-5 year old truck. That said, on the vehicles you listed above, Ford did drop the ball, but IMO, Ford won't let that happen w/ their bread-and-butter F-series.

I noticed that too, but I assume since they are considered "New-Model Quality Centers," they should be at the factory producing the new model.

Maybe it would help if they had the red reflector strip surround the taillight like the Milan? I also believe some sort of trunk lenses would help as well (even if fake).

I agree.

Funny, I thought I read somewhere that we wouldn't get the 4-door sedan. I suppose we'll find out when it's debuted.

Good find.

Me too

To help the environment as well as save money themselves --through electricity, etc.

I agree, at least on Sable. The Taurus at least has the vent to sorta break things up, but the Sable's side is very boring.

I like your advertising ideas.

Seems like these 'New-Product Quality Centers' ALONG W/ HARD WORK FROM FORD ASSEMBLY LINE WORKERS are helping to increase Ford's quality. Keep up the good work Ford!

that's crazy. I wonder when Tundra rebates will hit the $10,000 mark?

Haha! Good one.

I'd take the F-150 first, followed by the F-150, followed by the F-150..........then eventually maybe throw the new Sierra in there but I probably like that b/c it looks inspired by F-150.

I don't understand why Nissan is able to be exempt while everybody else has to comply with the regulations. It seems like as the article quoted, the NHTSA is giving Nissan a competitive advantage.

sorry, quadruple post.

sorry, quadruple post.

sorry, quadruple post.

Here's my new Thunderbird idea. Let me know what you think.

Great work timmm!

I agree with you.

I believe the Sable's taillights are LEDs, but each bulb is not visible like the Montego's were.

Congrats Ford!