Jump to content

valve

Member
  • Posts

    114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

valve's Achievements

64

Reputation

  1. Closing of this thread is long overdue.
  2. No fear. Just respect for everyone else, enough to research and know that masks do help and do work. Keep living in your denial of the scientific facts. This isn't oppression, it's respect for your fellow man. Get over yourself.
  3. You're correct. That opinion piece contains absolutely no scientific fact and should be ignored for the ignorance that it is.
  4. It never applied - you're not pregnant.
  5. I've driven the 1.5 AWD and 8.9s seems slow to me. It definitely felt much faster than that and other reviewers seem to agree. For example Car and Driver recorded 7.7s.
  6. Ford Authority has a few images of the Maverick beside a current generation Mustang, showing a good comparison on length. Based upon the length of the current Mustang (189 inches), it looks to be less than 200 inches overall for the Maverick. A good length I think. https://fordauthority.com/2021/03/2022-ford-maverick-prototype-spied-next-to-ford-mustang-shows-its-size/
  7. I'm thinking it is the final bumper - the license plate will go to the right of the hitch.
  8. Nice, we must be getting close the official reveal
  9. Still an odd comparison since I don't think the intention of either is to beat the CX-5. They are competing for different buyers. They may be in the same size class but that's about it.
  10. Seems like an odd comparison. The CX-5 isn't really a direct competitor to the other two.
  11. Agreed. I think it's the rear that could use some attention.
  12. It's a dependability study... Interior design or lacking features is not relevant.
  13. Jim Farley decided to reply to a post on Twitter for the Puma ST. Could it be a subtle hint that he is bringing it across the pond to NA? This would be a great replacement for the Ecosport.
×
×
  • Create New...