LIST OF G.W. BUSH ACCOMPLISHMENTS

[napfirst]

The only thing I see that you contrubute is your hate spreading right wing slander. I ask what any republician has accomplished in the last 8 years and you cannot respond with any intelligent answer. Maybe you should change your name to cut the cheese because you are starting to stink up this post.

Hate?...I see no hate in his comments...it's not hate to disagree with the president...I don't hate him...he seems to be a good father and husband......but as a leader he sucks........he's just no smart enough to do the job......

[TBodette68]

Where are the list of accomplishments from the conservitives for their hero Gorge W.

 

 

Besides the obvious things he messed up his biggest mistake was screwing things up so bad that a majority would elect an even bigger Jackass in Barack Hussein Obama as president. Shame on him.

[Racin' Rick]

First of all, I do not consider myself a "conservative", or a "republican". I consider myself an independent...why is being the President of a automotive company different than being the President of a country?

Best post I've ever read and 100% correct: well said, Cocheese!

[fordworker]

Sorry louie that was Chriss Dodd DEMOCRAT and Barney Frank DEMOCRAT you know the one that had to resign his post because he is a crook...do you home work if you want to have an honest conversation about the issues. THEY let Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac run wild and of course it wasClinton who took restrictions off of home lending and Clinton admits that was a problem.No doc loans are you kidding me? do the persons who took out these loans without even having a job at all responsible for their own bankruptcy? what about the people who use their houses for credit cards and financed them to the limit...then just walk away? THESE are things that cause the markets to crash..Dodd and Frank turned their heads. and by the way this so called finance reform does NOTHING to address Fannie And Freddie...they should be hung...Are you DEMOCRATS ever going to stop propping obama up with this b.s.? WHERE ARE THE JOBS? Every job he has created has cost the tax payers 1.2 million. 6 months from now you will be blaming that on Bush too. are you people ever going to let obama stand on his own record? This will really send you over the edge...in the latest NBC poll NOT FOX yes NBC as liberal as you can get... showed Bush 1 point behind obama if an election were held today...NOW WHAT? join the rest of us who can admit our mistakes. If you can't admit you made a mistake you surely can't fix it.

hey dumby who had the congress from 1994-2006?? REPUBLICANS.....so Barnet Frank and Dodd didnt have control...but dont let facts get in the way...it was Bush who made the 0% down mortgages widespread after 9/11 to artificially prop up the economy which fell like the ponzi scheme it was in 2007 and 08... it was the GOP that relaxed the regulations not the dems.. and every recovery starts with dow jones going up and the jobs follow go back and look at history or r u not allowed as u listen to Hannity and Rush your saviors.. maybe ask them who the ONLY 2 term president to leave office with the dow jones lower than when he took office is or who is the #1 2 term president to leave with the most jobs lost is.. both r Bush....

[fordworker]

"Clinton did not invade Iraq." Maybe he should have!

 

Clinton also did not act on Osama bin Ladin when he had acknowledged the threat he represented and the opportunity to act.

 

What Clinton did was educate a million preteens on what "oral sex with the president" was.

 

Oh, he also brought us NAFTA. Though Bush Sr. started it, Clinton signed it. How many American jobs went to Mexico since 1994?

Clinton acted on Al Queda and u republicans accused him of wagging the dog, and Bush was informed about Bin Laden in spring of 2001 and again right before he took his 39 day vacation in Texas in august 2001.... what did Bush do?? nothing thats what, instead he took all of the CIA off that case and sent most of them to New Orleans to battle the prostitution rings as Ashcroft demanded... ..As far as Clinton what about your 96 candidate Dole who left his family in kansas and married his interm( Elizabeth Dole) and what about Gingrich who let his hooker listen to natl security info... We wont mention Gov Sanford who did the worse thing ever done by a Gov.. and Ensign, Veeter, Craig asking for in bathroom,, ect ect ect

Edited April 30, 2010 by fordworker

[fordworker]

Clinton acted on Al Queda and u republicans accused him of wagging the dog, and Bush was informed about Bin Laden in spring of 2001 and again right before he took his 39 day vacation in Texas in august 2001.... what did Bush do?? nothing thats what, instead he took all of the CIA off that case and sent most of them to New Orleans to battle the prostitution rings as Ashcroft demanded... ..As far as Clinton what about your 96 candidate Dole who left his family in kansas and married his interm( Elizabeth Dole) and what about Gingrich who let his hooker listen to natl security info... We wont mention Gov Sanford who did the worse thing ever done by a Gov.. and Ensign, Veeter, Craig asking for in bathroom,, ect ect ect

[FiredMotorCompany]

I wasn't convinced until you repeated it.

[fmccap]

Clinton acted on Al Queda and u republicans accused him of wagging the dog, and Bush was informed about Bin Laden in spring of 2001 and again right before he took his 39 day vacation in Texas in august 2001.... what did Bush do?? nothing thats what, instead he took all of the CIA off that case and sent most of them to New Orleans to battle the prostitution rings as Ashcroft demanded... ..As far as Clinton what about your 96 candidate Dole who left his family in kansas and married his interm( Elizabeth Dole) and what about Gingrich who let his hooker listen to natl security info... We wont mention Gov Sanford who did the worse thing ever done by a Gov.. and Ensign, Veeter, Craig asking for in bathroom,, ect ect ect

If this turns out to be true then will you say the same thing?

OBAMA CHEATING SCANDAL

[RockofCashel]

Does the FD not sign a contract with the city to provide emergency response when it's called upon, whenever it's called upon, if it is ever called upon?

 

Maybe your city is different than other cities, but in my city, the FD has a no bid contract to provide fire response when called upon. They are employes of the Fire Department, not the city.

 

KBR and Dyncorp.

 

Neither has the ability to do what Haliburton does as well as they they can do them.

 

Chrysler and GM can provide cars that can be used as Police Interceptors, but they aren't as good as the one Ford provides

 

Torture is torture. It is illegal.

 

Again, your hippy description. I call it interrogation. No different then what the Police do every day

 

We have to be better than other countries, we are the big brother of the world according to you.

 

And if we have to fight with our hands tied behind our back, we will never win.

 

You're forgetting one organization that can do what Haliburton did more effectively and professionally: The United States Military. The money spent on the "No Bid Contracts" should have been spent on better equipment for our kids fighting over there. All Haliburton was pretty much ex-military, so Haliburton didn't even have to spend money on training.

 

In regard to torture, no, it doesn't work. You don't know if the information is true or not. What if you're torturing a person who really doesn't know anything, but he gives you false information to get you to stop? They've interviewed interogators from previous wars who said the best way to get information is to befriend as best as you can. They'll talk because they feel like they can trust you.

 

Lastly, Hussein was never a threat and never would've been. All invading Iraq did was take our eyes off of the real threat: Bin Laden. While screwing around in Iraq, Al Qaeda had the opportunity to move and reorganize.

[napfirst]

Does the FD not sign a contract with the city to provide emergency response when it's called upon, whenever it's called upon, if it is ever called upon?

 

Maybe your city is different than other cities, but in my city, the FD has a no bid contract to provide fire response when called upon. They are employes of the Fire Department, not the city.

 

KBR and Dyncorp.

 

Neither has the ability to do what Haliburton does as well as they they can do them.

 

Chrysler and GM can provide cars that can be used as Police Interceptors, but they aren't as good as the one Ford provides

 

Torture is torture. It is illegal.

 

Again, your hippy description. I call it interrogation. No different then what the Police do every day

 

We have to be better than other countries, we are the big brother of the world according to you.

 

And if we have to fight with our hands tied behind our back, we will never win.

 

You're forgetting one organization that can do what Haliburton did more effectively and professionally: The United States Military. The money spent on the "No Bid Contracts" should have been spent on better equipment for our kids fighting over there. All Haliburton was pretty much ex-military, so Haliburton didn't even have to spend money on training.

 

In regard to torture, no, it doesn't work. You don't know if the information is true or not. What if you're torturing a person who really doesn't know anything, but he gives you false information to get you to stop? They've interviewed interogators from previous wars who said the best way to get information is to befriend as best as you can. They'll talk because they feel like they can trust you.

 

Lastly, Hussein was never a threat and never would've been. All invading Iraq did was take our eyes off of the real threat: Bin Laden. While screwing around in Iraq, Al Qaeda had the opportunity to move and reorganize.

 

If as you say hussein was no threat, then why did Senator Rockefeller (D) say the following on CNN on Feb 5th, 2003.."Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a real threat to America today, tomorrow"...he further cited.." the Oct. 2002 death of a US foreign service officer at the hands of abu musab al-zarqawi, a known al-qaeda associate who fled to Iraq from Afghanistan after the taliban was overthrown".........

 

and then there is Jane Harman (D), the highest ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee in late 2002said that "Saddam Hussein's belligerent intentions and his possession and ongoing development of weapons of mass destruction to fullfill those intentions make him a clear and present dander to the US and the world"....

 

then there's Bob Graham (D), who after 9/11 wrote a letter with several other dem and Republican to Bush that said.."There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs......we are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction"

 

 

now let's talk about enhanced interrogation techniques (EIT), (you call it tortue)...it was authorized by the Department of Justice in August of 2002 and done only with the explicit authorization of the CIA director....after 9/11 the US captured abu zubaydah, a top lieutenant of bin laden...after using EIT on him he provided information on key al-qaeda operatives, including info that led to the capture of the terririst ramzi bin al-shibh, before he could follow thru on his plot an encore to 9/11 by flying planes into Heathrow Airport and London

 

 

you need to do a litte reasearch before you come on here spouting off the dem's talking points....

Edited May 1, 2010 by napfirst

[FiredMotorCompany]

ame='RockofCashel' date='01 May 2010 - 08:17 AM' timestamp='1272716262' post='612424']

 

 

If as you say hussein was no threat, then why did Senator Rockefeller (D) say the following on CNN on Feb 5th, 2003.."Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a real threat to America today, tomorrow"...he further cited.." the Oct. 2002 death of a US foreign service officer at the hands of abu musab al-zarqawi, a known al-qaeda associate who fled to Iraq from Afghanistan after the taliban was overthrown".........

 

and then there is Jane Harman (D), the highest ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee in late 2002said that "Saddam Hussein's belligerent intentions and his possession and ongoing development of weapons of mass destruction to fullfill those intentions make him a clear and present dander to the US and the world"....

 

then there's Bob Graham (D), who after 9/11 wrote a letter with several other dem and Republican to Bush that said.."There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs......we are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction"

 

 

now let's talk about enhanced interrogation techniques (EIT), (you call it tortue)...it was authorized by the Department of Justice in August of 2002 and done only with the explicit authorization of the CIA director....after 9/11 the US captured abu zubaydah, a top lieutenant of bin laden...after using EIT on him he provided information on key al-qaeda operatives, including info that led to the capture of the terririst ramzi bin al-shibh, before he could follow thru on his plot an encore to 9/11 by flying planes into Heathrow Airport and London

 

 

you need to do a litte reasearch before you come on here spouting off the dem's talking points....

 

For clarification, your comments were addressed toward RockofCashel, correct?

[Aces]

Perhaps a giant oil leak in the Gulf is one of the Bush administrations accomplishments?

 

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/papantonio-thank-dick-cheney-and-his-meeti

[Trimdingman]

Perhaps a giant oil leak in the Gulf is one of the Bush administrations accomplishments?

 

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/papantonio-thank-dick-cheney-and-his-meeti

 

You are believing something that one side's lawyer is saying before it even goes to court. Do you believe that an oil company will put everything at risk just to save $500,000 on a safety device because the government doesn't require this device? This shows a mindset that government has to govern your every move. This disaster is undoubtably going to cost the oil company billions. It is the last thing that they wanted to happen. It is not the government's fault. They screwed up, and they will have to pay. The timing of this disaster is suspicious, as Obama just announced that he was going to expand off-shore drilling. I think that the cause is still under investigation.

[Aces]

Perhaps a giant oil leak in the Gulf is one of the Bush administrations accomplishments?

 

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/papantonio-thank-dick-cheney-and-his-meeti

 

 

You are believing something that one side's lawyer is saying before it even goes to court. Do you believe that an oil company will put everything at risk just to save $500,000 on a safety device because the government doesn't require this device? This shows a mindset that government has to govern your every move. This disaster is undoubtably going to cost the oil company billions. It is the last thing that they wanted to happen. It is not the government's fault. They screwed up, and they will have to pay. The timing of this disaster is suspicious, as Obama just announced that he was going to expand off-shore drilling. I think that the cause is still under investigation.

 

 

I don't think I need you to tell me what I believe.

 

Perhaps you need to learn the meaning of "perhaps"? And the meaning of a question mark?

 

Maybe you should stick to cleaning toilets.

[napfirst]

For clarification, your comments were addressed toward RockofCashel, correct?

Yes......

[rainbownthdrk]

Where are the list of accomplishments from the conservitives for their hero Gorge W.

 

I would like to remind this fact to all the Obama loving and UN glorifying libs: It was a U.S. Army soldier and not some United Nations bureaucrat that Saddam Hussein surrendered to. The UN tried Ump-teen different sanctions against Saddam and he laughed. Both Pres. Bush AND Congress (including plenty of Democrats) saw a threat in Saddam. They voted "YES" in favor of invading Iraq.When the war went south the libs reneged on their vote and campaigned against the war in Iraq. The American military won the Iraq war IN SPITE OF the libs lack of support. The future of Iraq now is pretty much up to the Iraqis. Oh yeah......How many Conservatives are against Obamas surge in Afghanistan? I believe that would be Zero....except for some that wanted more troops sent there.

[RockofCashel]

ame='RockofCashel' date='01 May 2010 - 08:17 AM' timestamp='1272716262' post='612424']

 

 

If as you say hussein was no threat, then why did Senator Rockefeller (D) say the following on CNN on Feb 5th, 2003.."Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a real threat to America today, tomorrow"...he further cited.." the Oct. 2002 death of a US foreign service officer at the hands of abu musab al-zarqawi, a known al-qaeda associate who fled to Iraq from Afghanistan after the taliban was overthrown".........

 

and then there is Jane Harman (D), the highest ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee in late 2002said that "Saddam Hussein's belligerent intentions and his possession and ongoing development of weapons of mass destruction to fullfill those intentions make him a clear and present dander to the US and the world"....

 

then there's Bob Graham (D), who after 9/11 wrote a letter with several other dem and Republican to Bush that said.."There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs......we are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction"

 

 

now let's talk about enhanced interrogation techniques (EIT), (you call it tortue)...it was authorized by the Department of Justice in August of 2002 and done only with the explicit authorization of the CIA director....after 9/11 the US captured abu zubaydah, a top lieutenant of bin laden...after using EIT on him he provided information on key al-qaeda operatives, including info that led to the capture of the terririst ramzi bin al-shibh, before he could follow thru on his plot an encore to 9/11 by flying planes into Heathrow Airport and London

 

 

you need to do a litte reasearch before you come on here spouting off the dem's talking points....

 

You're using politicians as your source of information and I need to do research?

 

Look, taking out Hussein was a good thing from a moral standpoint, but Iraq never was never a threat. An American getting killed in the Middle East does not count as a threat either. I am talking about threats to our nation directly. Foreign officers know the risks they are taking by going into certain areas of the world. The people who went to work on September 11th, 2001 were killed by terroritsts, not Iraq.

 

Bush should've taken a page from Reagan while dealing with the Middle East: keep them fighting each other. That way they'll leave us alone and the price of oil will stay down. Invading Iraq just gave the Middle East a common enemy, us.

[whereswaldo]

Where are the list of accomplishments from the conservitives for their hero Gorge W.

Maybe I missed it but i am still waitng for his Accomplishments.....the positive ones......

[EdselBryantFord]

is george bush an employee?

[fmccap]

Cheney worked for Halliburton and they were awarded no bid contracts to rebuild Iraq. Fact.

Obama does the same thing. FACT!!! There is no difference.

OBAMA PENTAGON GIVES $500M 'NO BID' CONTRACT TO HALLIBURTON...

[partsisparts]

Obama does the same thing. FACT!!! There is no difference.

OBAMA PENTAGON GIVES $500M 'NO BID' CONTRACT TO HALLIBURTON...

It is not the same. Obama never worked for KBR. Cheney worked for Halliburton.

[fmccap]

It is not the same. Obama never worked for KBR. Cheney worked for Halliburton.

So he made the right decision and Cheney didn't?

 

Should Cheney have used a company less capable of doing the job just because he worked for them?