silvrsvt Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 7 hours ago, Rick73 said: Did you see the part where I stated “provided engine displacement is ideal to minimize fuel None of this really matters since 3.3L is gone, and buyers who prefer NA engines are essentially left with 5.0L V8. I’m not counting 5.2L. You can’t because it comes only with a big stonking Supercharger on it now ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick73 Posted September 15, 2023 Share Posted September 15, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, silvrsvt said: You can’t because it comes only with a big stonking Supercharger on it now ? Yeah, at a personal level, I can’t relate to that extreme any more than opposite extreme of wanting a vehicle that requires standing still for over 30 minutes while it charges. Like most buyers, the middle ground works just fine for me. Not critiquing extremes, just not my thing. Edited September 15, 2023 by Rick73 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2005Explorer Posted September 27, 2023 Share Posted September 27, 2023 (edited) On 9/12/2023 at 8:02 PM, DeluxeStang said: Some people are just never pleased. I saw some comments on a YouTube vid of how getting rid of the 3.3 in favor of the 2.7 was a big mistake. Claiming they didn't want an unreliable turbocharged engine, tell me you know nothing about cars without telling me you know nothing about cars. Someone else was bitching about the new looks. People are so predictable these days. I think they nailed it. If you don't like or trust a turbo get the 5.0 V8. I would assume except for a single cab or SuperCab 4x2 the 3.3 NA V6 had to be underpowered. Edited September 27, 2023 by 2005Explorer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.