-
Posts
45,246 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1,639
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Everything posted by akirby
-
Anyone kept from voting because they didn't have proper id only have themselves to blame. You can't force people to get ids - all you can do is make them available and let it be clearly known that it is required - the rest is up to the individual. If this causes voter apathy and that happens to affect one party more than the other then maybe that party should go help these people get ids.
-
BMW juced July Sales with 1 day "demo" offer to dealers
akirby replied to PREMiERdrum's topic in Competing Products
Nope. They only count a sale when the customer actually buys it. -
Honda releases first 2013 Accord Coupe pictures
akirby replied to TomServo92's topic in Competing Products
POTW! -
Lincoln Product Plan: Hits, no Halo Vehicles
akirby replied to mackinaw's topic in Ford Motor Company Discussion Forum
The current Lincoln team had nothing to do with the MKT or the Navigator. What I've seen of the MKZ so far is enough to tell me they will get it right or they won't do it at all. -
MyFord Touch is Still Not Right for 2013
akirby replied to transitman's topic in Ford Motor Company Discussion Forum
This is definitely not good. It almost sounds like you have the old software but I assume you already checked that since you had the Focus. My guess would be a bad APIM if it's already got the latest software. -
Lincoln Product Plan: Hits, no Halo Vehicles
akirby replied to mackinaw's topic in Ford Motor Company Discussion Forum
The market shrank because of better alternatives in midsized crossovers, the availability of nice 4 door F150s and rising fuel prices. People who bought them but didn't really need the extra towing capacity or extra adult seating downsized to smaller more fuel efficient vehicles. The only ones left in the market are the ones who truly need the towing or seating capacity or people who just like big vehicles and don't care about fuel costs and I don't see that changing. There is definitely still a market - it's just a lot smaller than it used to be and it would be difficult to justify a one-off platform going forward which is what happened with the Expedition when it went to IRS. -
The only time this would not apply is if YOU were the aggressor, instigating the fight. You can't go up to someone and start a fight, then resort to deadly force and claim self defense. There is no evidence that Zimmerman initiated any violence or physical confrontation. Martin could have easily outrun him i he wanted to get away from him. I think Martin came back and confronted him for following him and that turned into a fight. Who started the fight will never be proven as there are no witnesses (at least not that I've heard so far). Please note that I'm not condoning anything Zimmerman did - just trying to clarify the facts of the case as it would apply to a defense strategy and ultimately to a jury finding.
-
Lincoln Product Plan: Hits, no Halo Vehicles
akirby replied to mackinaw's topic in Ford Motor Company Discussion Forum
Yes it would and that's why it's the only viable scenario for keeping the Expy and or Navi. But with a shrinking market the business case is probably slim so they have to decide if it's worth keeping at all. -
Ford Reviewing European Product Lineup
akirby replied to mackinaw's topic in Ford Motor Company Discussion Forum
According to Biker16 the European market is perfect and every vehicle they make is a home run and Ford is stupid for not selling all of them here. -
A suggestion for better times ahead-- Performance Cars!
akirby replied to calypsocoral's topic in Ford: Wish List
If it's unacceptable to you don't buy it but it's perfectly acceptable to most buyers. And you're not going to be able to get much more power out of that platform - they had to totally redesign the front clip just to keep it from exploding with the current 365 hp. You'll have to wait for a new RWD platform to get much more power and it's unclear whether that's in the cards or not. -
Everybody understands that minivans have more utility than crossovers or suvs and station wagons ride and handle better. People buy crossovers and suvs because they prefer the styling and/or the taller seating position. Some people simply do not like the look of minivans and station wagons. It's that simple. And who are you to tell people what vehicle they should be driving? You don't know their motives and even if you did it's none of your business. Why aren't you driving a Prius instead of a Corolla? It gets way better gas mileage and it's a hatchback. You're obviously driving the wrong vehicle.
-
It's not MY spin - it's the media spin created by the IIHS press release wording. I don't have any problem whatsoever with the test. If all the IIHS wanted to do was help the mfrs make safer vehicles then they could have just released the test results to the mfrs. Or they could have just released the test results without labeling them as poor or marginal or unacceptable. Or they could have given the ones that passed 6 or 7 stars and left the old ones at 4 and 5 stars. I don't understand why this isn't obvious to everyone.
-
What have the democrats offered the last 4 years that's any better?
-
That's the wi-fi hotspot feature where the car becomes a wi-fi hotspot for other devices using a 3g or 4g data connection. The OP was asking about the feature to connect the vehicle to another wi-fi hotspot which would only really be used by the mft web browser which isn't available yet.
-
Your conclusion and the average consumer's conclusion may be totally different. Show a consumer a test report that says a vehicle scored Marginal or Poor and tell me how they're supposed to respond? And what about Brady's headline: Four luxury sedans fail new Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash test That's how consumers will be presented the test results and that's the impression they will get.
-
What does someone's opinion have to do with his actual fiscal accumen? Nothing. You hate anything labeled Republican or Conservative and you do nothing but look for ways to attack or criticize. Others do the same thing with Liberals and Democrats. It's turned into a game of college football where your team is right and your team must win so you support everything your team does and you attack everything the other team does. And that goes for both sides. It serves no purpose other than to prevent us from getting to a common ground and actually solving problems. If the Republicans got off their religious high horse and stopped talking about gay marriage and abortion (which have nothing whatsoever to do with running the country) and the Democrats would stop hating rich people then we might actually be able to have some bipartisan solutions that benefit the country.
-
Maybe the better question is whether insurance premiums have gone down as cars have gotten safer? I know mine haven't. This gives them an excuse not to lower premiums as cars get safer. If their costs go down due to fewer injuries but their premiums stay the same, who pockets the difference? It would be much better if they used absolute numbers rather than relative measurements. Let's go back to the old 5 star rating system from 10 or 20 years ago. Why not just add stars as cars get better? So a car that was 5 stars in 2002 would still be a 5 star today but newer cars may be 6 or 7 stars now. It keeps the relative rankings intact. Resetting the bar forces car mfrs to keep up or risk sales from poor public perception - even though the 2 star cars of today are much much better than the 5 star cars from 20 years ago. And those expenses get passed on to the customers. That's probably good when you're talking about percentage improvements in the double digits but at this point we're talking about tiny fractions of improvement in real world outcomes and at some point it's simply not worth the cost.
-
Until they get the web browser enabled - not much.