Mark R. Boler Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 Pretty sure that is normal for all newer Ford Autos. Not the weird shifting, the no fill/ no dip stick. No. I just bought an '09 Flex that has the filler/dipstick. I really would like to replace the crap fluid with synthetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenCaylor Posted July 16, 2008 Share Posted July 16, 2008 No. I just bought an '09 Flex that has the filler/dipstick. I really would like to replace the crap fluid with synthetic. Don't most Ford autos come with Mercon V? That's allready synthetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted August 19, 2008 Author Share Posted August 19, 2008 Don't most Ford autos come with Mercon V? That's allready synthetic. Good point. Latest results just posted for the Mustang, covering owner experiences through the end of June. The 2006 and 2007 continue to have very low repair rates. The 2005 is a little higher, but still better than the average 2005. We need more participants, especially for the 2007 and 2008. For all results: TrueDelta Vehicle Reliability Survey results Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckshot Barry Posted August 24, 2008 Share Posted August 24, 2008 (edited) Oops, wrong thread Edited August 24, 2008 by Buckshot Barry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted October 15, 2008 Author Share Posted October 15, 2008 Updated results in November. Additional participants always helpful. Vehicle reliability research Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted January 5, 2009 Author Share Posted January 5, 2009 Those results were updated--the current Mustang continues to require few repairs, though the repair rate for the 2005 has crept up to about average. This month's survey is the last before the February results. Additional participants would be very helpful, especially 2008s and 2009s. For the details, and to sign up to help: Vehicle reliability research Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckshot Barry Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 From participating in www.mustangforums.com for the past 2 years, I think you should monitors these problem areas. Water leaking in to the passenger side floor board. In addition to getting the carpet wet it has caused major electrical issues. Popping noise from the front struts. Ford redesigned the upper strut mount rubber thingy (sorry I don't remember the name of the part). Ford also started adding the 4R3Z5025A Cross Member and (4) W711553-S440 Nuts on all models in March or April 1999. The crossmember brace was originally only on the convertible models. Vertical scratches on the door windows caused by the molding. I believe there are TSB's on all 3 of the above issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted February 3, 2009 Author Share Posted February 3, 2009 Thanks for the tip. Which model years are affected? The 2005 on cars seem pretty solid based on TrueDelta's survey results. For earlier years especially we still need more participants. Car reliability research Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted February 9, 2009 Author Share Posted February 9, 2009 (edited) The latest Car Reliability Survey results were recently posted. The reported number of repair trips per 100 cars per year: 2007: 15 -- very low 2006: 38 -- still "better than average" 2005: 60 -- average, maybe a bit better Insufficient data so far for the 2008, and the sample size for the 2005 was three short of the minimum. So that result is asterisked and only visible to members or the site itself. We'll have further updates in May, August, and November, so additional participants would certainly be helpful. Especially for the 2005, 2008, 2009, and (when it arrives) 2010. We now have a separate results page for each model. The ones for the Mustang: Ford Mustang reliability comparisons Edited February 9, 2009 by mkaresh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2k05gt Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 (edited) In late 2005 I started conducting my own reliability research. I'm reporting absolute stats like "times in the shop" that will make the differences between cars much clearer. Relative ratings obscure too much--how large is the difference between "better than average" and "worse than average"? I’ll also be updating results four times a year, so there will be information on new models sooner. I'm collecting data on recent years of the Mustang, but the number of participants is marginal. More Mustangs in the panel would be very helpful. To encourage participation, panel members will receive full access to the results free of charge. Details: Vehicle reliability research Comments, questions, and suggestions welcome. I for one have only had my car in the shop once for an issue. I have a 2005 Mustang GT and have 71,000 miles now, I race every weekend at the track and other than my abuse, the cars runs spectacular. I had replaced the Rear end Bushings on both Lower and upper controls arms but that is again my abuse, a normal car would not see Launching at 3000 rpm with Drag Radials and running upto 110 mph 5-8 times a week Edited March 3, 2009 by 2k05gt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefstang Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 I for one have only had my car in the shop once for an issue. I have a 2005 Mustang GT and have 71,000 miles now, I race every weekend at the track and other than my abuse, the cars runs spectacular. I had replaced the Rear end Bushings on both Lower and upper controls arms but that is again my abuse, a normal car would not see Launching at 3000 rpm with Drag Radials and running upto 110 mph 5-8 times a week Dude. Just checked out your timeslips. Pretty sick for what's done to the car! Nice job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dans07gt Posted March 14, 2009 Share Posted March 14, 2009 I just bought a 2004 Mustang GT last August with 23,000 miles on it and love it. no problems with it. the only thing is can't put top down as much as i'd like because Spring doesn't seem to want to get here in full bloom lol. but warmer weather is just right around the corner here in Maryland. saw enough Robins. can't wait for the road trip to the 45 Anny in Alabama next month. Save a Horse and drive a Mustang. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted April 24, 2009 Author Share Posted April 24, 2009 Updated results in May. 295 Mustangs signed up so far. #300 soon? This is a good start, but more are needed to cover all years from 1995 on. Car reliability research Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted May 27, 2009 Author Share Posted May 27, 2009 (edited) We've updated the results for the Mustang to include owner experiences through March 2009. In terms of successful repair trips per 100 cars per year: 2008: 43, about average, very small sample size 2007: 22, better than average 2006: 53, about average 2005: 60, about average, marginal sample size A big thank you to everyone who has been helping. We'll have further updates in August and November. With more participants, we could provide more precise information and cover all model years. Ford Mustang reliability comparisons Edited May 31, 2009 by mkaresh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. KABC Posted June 3, 2009 Share Posted June 3, 2009 I just signed up my 2005! :happy feet: 300 is getting closer and closer. Just FYI, I have 65000 miles. Replaced rack and pinion and a window motor under warranty. The convertible top window glass is separating from the top. THAT bad boy isn't under warranty so I am going to have to eat an expensive top soon. SIGH... Other than that the car has been flawless and fun to drive since August 2005. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted July 29, 2009 Author Share Posted July 29, 2009 Thanks, I appreciate it. Updated results next month. Car reliability research Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtstakelin Posted August 11, 2009 Share Posted August 11, 2009 Karesh, thanks for your work. For those of us who had (have) been repeatedly burned by poor-reliability vehicles. every little bit counts. As someone who ran to Japanese vehicles 25 years ago after two crap cars (Trans Am, Mustang) in a row, I can attest how important the reliability is to many consumers. Since my defection, with three cars (Toyota, Nissan, Isuzu) with a combined 1,200,000 miles, I've had ONE relianility issue - a bum transmission - and that was covered by warranty. Consumer Reports is my bible, Karesh is my torah, and other consumer reflections matter as well. It's all good, and adds up to make a wise consumer decision. It seems only recently (6-7 years) that Ford is getting serious about improving their vehicles - a very welcomed move on their part. Hopefully the reliability holds up as well. Consumer Reports is your Bible? You're a freaking moron!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tico Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 2004 GT coup, atx 55K miles. Drive it year round even in the snow (snow tires). No probelms. Oil, Tires and wiper blades. That is all. Yes I beat on it sometimes. I don't need a survey. In 2014 I will buy another Mustang.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted October 2, 2009 Author Share Posted October 2, 2009 We've updated the results for the Mustang to include owner experiences through June 2009. In terms of successful repair trips per 100 cars per year: 2008: 53, about average, small sample size 2007: 39, better than average 2006: 52, about average 2005: 60, about average A big thank you, once again, to everyone who has been helping. We'll have further updates in November and February. With more participants, we could provide more precise information and cover all model years. Ford Mustang reliability comparisons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob O. Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 I've got an 05 Coupe and really enjoy it--the only issue I've had is a broken door handle about a month or so ago--I was a little disapointed that it wasn't covered under my ESP (they considered it a "trim item" ) but overall its a great car!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted November 4, 2009 Author Share Posted November 4, 2009 Updated results again later this month. We're going to start providing new stats for the odds of requiring no repairs and the odds of getting a lemon. These require larger sample sizes, so additional participants would be helpful. For the details, and to sign up: Car reliability research Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted December 14, 2009 Author Share Posted December 14, 2009 We've updated the results for the Mustang to include owner experiences through September 30, 2009. In terms of repair trips per 100 cars per year: 2008: 33 2007: 44 2006: 50 2005: 55 All are better than average. A big thank you, once again, to everyone who has been helping. We'll have further updates in February and May. With more participants, we could provide more precise information and cover all model years. Ford Mustang reliability comparisons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted January 18, 2010 Author Share Posted January 18, 2010 (edited) 376 Ford Mustang owners now signed up. A good start, but more are needed to provide precise results for all model years from 1995 on. Not yet signed up? Details here: Car reliability research Edited January 18, 2010 by mkaresh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted February 21, 2010 Author Share Posted February 21, 2010 We've updated the results for the Mustang to include owner experiences through December 31, 2009. In terms of repair trips per 100 cars per year: 2010: 63, small sample size 2008: 37 2007: 38 2006: 46 2005: 37 The 2010 is about average, the others are better than average. A big thank you, once again, to everyone who has been helping. We'll have further updates in May and August. With more participants, we could provide more precise information and cover all model years. Ford Mustang reliability comparisons Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkaresh Posted March 26, 2010 Author Share Posted March 26, 2010 Just enhanced the related repair history survey so that it can (optionally) be used as a personal car maintenance record. As always, more participants would be helpful. Car reliability research Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.