Jump to content

August 2007 Fullsize Pickup Trucks


waymondospiff

Recommended Posts

F-Series

69,220 August... -9.9%...481,146 YTD...-11.9%

 

Silverado

71,172 August..+23.1%...461,796 YTD...-1.1%

includes Avalanche:

3,686 August...-44.6%...36,417 YTD...+13.4%

 

RAM (includes specialty SRT-10)

32,309 August...-5%...246,878 YTD...-2%

 

Sierra

23,574 August...+34.2%...138,759 YTD...-2.4%

 

Tundra

18,919 August...+69.3%...124,909 YTD...+57.5%

 

Titan

6,985 August...+23.6%...45,766 YTD...-9.2%

 

Specialty:

Mark LT

768 August...-23.7%...5,858 YTD...-31.2%

 

Escalade EXT

652 August...-11.8%...5,353 YTD...+56.4%

 

The F-Series isn't the top-selling truck for a month. There's still a solid 20K YTD advantage for the F-150 over the Silverado...but that seems within striking distance if Ford can't manage to push the F-150 like Chevy & Toyota are pushing their trucks.

 

Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F-Series

69,220 August... -9.9%...481,146 YTD...-11.9%

 

Silverado

71,172 August..+23.1%...461,796 YTD...-1.1%

includes Avalanche:

3,686 August...-44.6%...36,417 YTD...+13.4%

 

RAM (includes specialty SRT-10)

32,309 August...-5%...246,878 YTD...-2%

 

Sierra

23,574 August...+34.2%...138,759 YTD...-2.4%

 

Tundra

18,919 August...+69.3%...124,909 YTD...+57.5%

 

Titan

6,985 August...+23.6%...45,766 YTD...-9.2%

 

Specialty:

Mark LT

768 August...-23.7%...5,858 YTD...-31.2%

 

Escalade EXT

652 August...-11.8%...5,353 YTD...+56.4%

 

The F-Series isn't the top-selling truck for a month. There's still a solid 20K YTD advantage for the F-150 over the Silverado...but that seems within striking distance if Ford can't manage to push the F-150 like Chevy & Toyota are pushing their trucks.

 

Scott

 

But really, who cares? Combining the Silverado and Sierra...who's really on top?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 months toyota, you better start throwing money like crazy if you want to sell 200K Turdas this year.

 

I still find it funny that they say their projected sales target was 200K when the actual capacity for the two plants building them now is around 300K. Can we say underperforming?

 

I think Toyota was hoping this truck would sell well over 200K so they could claim they "smashed our internal targets" while still coming nowhere close to fully utilizing capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

around 300K.

If you figure 240k at San Antonio and 120k or so at Princeton, you're at 360k.

 

Not smart.

 

I mean they can run the line slow at San Antonio and pretend that they never planned on building more than 200k trucks there, but who are they kidding?

 

Not to mention declining sales of the 4Runner & Sienna have opened up capacity for the Tundra at Princeton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly I still don't see what is so appealing about the Tundra personally. It doesn't look good, it's damned expensive and it's not as rugged or capable as the F150 pound for pound. If you gave me one for free I'd likely sell it. The Tacoma vs the Ranger I can see why people opt for the Tacoma. But that Tundra is just not that good of a truck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly I still don't see what is so appealing about the Tundra personally. It doesn't look good, it's damned expensive and it's not as rugged or capable as the F150 pound for pound. If you gave me one for free I'd likely sell it. The Tacoma vs the Ranger I can see why people opt for the Tacoma. But that Tundra is just not that good of a truck.

 

I saw a brand new Tundra at my local Ford dealer in the used lot the other day. I don't blame the guy, but at the same time, he shouldn't have bought it in the first place. At least he realized his mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But really, who cares? Combining the Silverado and Sierra...who's really on top?!

Well, the GM duo has outsold the F-Series for years. But the F-Series is the best selling nameplate.

 

do you mean the 71,172 number includes Avalanche meaning 67,486 Silverado sales, or 71,172 + 3,686 = Silverado/Avalanche sales?

67,486 + 3,686 = Chevy GMT900 sales

 

Frankly I still don't see what is so appealing about the Tundra personally. It doesn't look good, it's damned expensive and it's not as rugged or capable as the F150 pound for pound. If you gave me one for free I'd likely sell it. The Tacoma vs the Ranger I can see why people opt for the Tacoma. But that Tundra is just not that good of a truck.

The Tundra may not be as tough as the F-150 but it's more than capable of daily commuting work and weekend runs to Home Depot. And when sold thousands under sticker it becomes pretty attractive.

 

Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the GM duo has outsold the F-Series for years. But the F-Series is the best selling nameplate.

67,486 + 3,686 = Chevy GMT900 sales

The Tundra may not be as tough as the F-150 but it's more than capable of daily commuting work and weekend runs to Home Depot. And when sold thousands under sticker it becomes pretty attractive.

 

Scott

 

Attractive being a subjective term. I can get an F150 to do all of that commuting / Home Depot stuff too, and I don't have to drive an ugly truck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...