Reigner92 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 (edited) Side View consists of : Holden 600 coupe, Challenger, 2007 Ford Mustang GT Front View consists of : GMC Denali concept, Ford Mustang GT concept ( I think from 2005), Jaguar XF, SMS mustang BTW, this is the GT model and i was hoping Ford would start to make the GT model look more extreme compared to the base models and such.... just something to keep in mind...(although this might be a bit too extreme) I doubt the Mustang will go this route...but its just a topic to think about, and i had fun doing the renderings...(sorry for the change of background around the wheels in the front image...i tried to get rid of it and failed..so i just left it) tell me what you think? If suggestions are made, I will be happy to do a followup rendering ala your comments and post it... Edited July 2, 2009 by Reigner92 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerM Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 (edited) Is the first one a hatch? If so, I'm seeing a lot of this in it. It's not a problem, since there was a time when the Mustang WAS a hatch, but maybe it's because I grew up in the '80s that it just doesn't seem (to me) to fit the mold of the retro-style that the Mustang currently has. Just my $0.02. Edited July 2, 2009 by RangerM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 I hope you don't mind, I played with it, worked on the proportions and the "C" scoop has to be turned around! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigner92 Posted July 2, 2009 Author Share Posted July 2, 2009 Is the first one a hatch? If so, I'm seeing a lot of this in it. It's not a problem, since there was a time when the Mustang WAS a hatch, but maybe it's because I grew up in the '80s that it just doesn't seem (to me) to fit the mold of the retro-style that the Mustang currently has. Just my $0.02. No, its not a hatchback,... sorry, I didn't mean it to come off as one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigner92 Posted July 2, 2009 Author Share Posted July 2, 2009 What do you guys think of the front views? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 (edited) What do you guys think of the front views? It's better, needs a "corral" to be a Mustang........[[---------]] Without changing it too much, maybe something like this................ Edited July 2, 2009 by timmm55 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigner92 Posted July 2, 2009 Author Share Posted July 2, 2009 It's better, needs a "corral" to be a Mustang........[[---------]] Without changing it too much, maybe something like this................ Damn i liked it before...but now i really like it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerM Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 No, its not a hatchback,... sorry, I didn't mean it to come off as one. No need to be sorry. It's your artistic prerogative, and my misinterpretation. It takes a level of courage to put yourself out there for others to critique. That said, you could be onto something even it it were a hatch. I always have had a soft spot for the Mustangs of the '70s. I liked the way they looked, although I admit I never cared for the interiors. (Yeah, I actually like a lot of the music from then, too. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 I hope you don't mind, I played with it, worked on the proportions and the "C" scoop has to be turned around! Still looks too stubby, here's elongated version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREMiERdrum Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 Still looks too stubby, here's elongated version. I really like this one... It has a Ferarri look to it, in a good way. The C pillar looks a little thick, what if the window line extended a little further? Really, really good work guys. Keep it up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigner92 Posted July 3, 2009 Author Share Posted July 3, 2009 Timm, I put all the side lines and curves on mine to make it busier and give it more appearance.. right now it is more sleek than muscular.. as premierdrum stated "It has a Ferarri look to it, in a good way". We should keep the ferrari look...but add more lines... at least in my opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 It can get too busy however.......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigner92 Posted July 3, 2009 Author Share Posted July 3, 2009 Sorry Tim, I still think that is too plain for a modern day muscle car.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREMiERdrum Posted July 3, 2009 Share Posted July 3, 2009 It can get too busy however.......... I actually think that's getting there... I agree that it needs to be a bit more, how do I say, ballsy. Maybe define the C line a bit more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigner92 Posted July 4, 2009 Author Share Posted July 4, 2009 I actually think that's getting there... I agree that it needs to be a bit more, how do I say, ballsy. Maybe define the C line a bit more? How about this? It is a combination of mine and Tim's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREMiERdrum Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 How about this?It is a combination of mine and Tim's. This is good... here's a thought though: What if you moved the pony (no corrall) to the space under the upkick in the window line? I'm thinking that would look really cool there as a dimentional emblem, chromed, or maybe even body color. I'm just thinking about loud here, but the emblem down there would weigh down the base enough so that the c pillar seems anchored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigner92 Posted July 4, 2009 Author Share Posted July 4, 2009 I don't think that would look good when seeing it in person as that would put the icon on the shoulder. The shoulder sticks out a bit...I think it would just look odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donzuchowski Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 No need to be sorry. It's your artistic prerogative, and my misinterpretation. It takes a level of courage to put yourself out there for others to critique. That said, you could be onto something even it it were a hatch. I always have had a soft spot for the Mustangs of the '70s. I liked the way they looked, although I admit I never cared for the interiors. (Yeah, I actually like a lot of the music from then, too. ) i loved also the mustang II i wish the next one would be based off the design, so sexy... i would name my kids after it.... and ford should also re-consider a full range mustange, 4 door, stationwagon and all, and cross over and small truck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 i loved also the mustang II i wish the next one would be based off the design, so sexy... i would name my kids after it....and ford should also re-consider a full range mustange, 4 door, stationwagon and all, and cross over and small truck Ummmm ...........NO. Were you the guy who wanted side pipes on a Town Car? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted July 4, 2009 Share Posted July 4, 2009 A GT....remember that the Mustang in base vanilla trim is not festered with a lot of do-dads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerM Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 Ummmm ...........NO. Were you the guy who wanted side pipes on a Town Car? Either that, or he's been smoking one. (a pipe, that is.) He's confused with the Dodge Magnum. IIRC, it would meet nearly all the criteria he mentioned (over the span of many years) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmc523 Posted July 5, 2009 Share Posted July 5, 2009 A GT....remember that the Mustang in base vanilla trim is not festered with a lot of do-dads. I like that one Tim. Good work both of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREMiERdrum Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 A GT....remember that the Mustang in base vanilla trim is not festered with a lot of do-dads. VERY nice! The stripe terminating into the scoop looks awesome... good work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dans07gt Posted August 23, 2009 Share Posted August 23, 2009 The front looks great and i like the side view. i hope they work on the tail lites. not everyone is happy with the 2010 tailites . other than that with a new motor and more HP Ford has a great car for the future, as for going green just offer different greens and keep the HP. lol thank you Ford for the Best Muscle car ever produced and keeping it in production after 45 years plus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustang84isu Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 I like Timmm's latest effort. Some of the earlier designs were too busy and oddly proportioned, but this more recent one is getting on the right track. And the Mustang II had awful proportions...there is no need to base any future Mustang off that era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.