Jump to content

New Fusion to be Engineered in North America


Recommended Posts

As far as I know, very little of the Fiesta's components will be shipped to Mexico from Europe. Exchange rates would kill its profitablity. To use another example: C1 Focus. Parts for those vehicles are manufactured in several different locations.

So, this is different than what I said?

Notwhatisaid.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, they do have multiple plants making the same 'part' in many cases.

OK, I'll retract my statement. It's too far out of context now. I and you and the original questioner are all thinking differently.

 

FIXED

Edited by Critic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Austin I am sure it is a very complex topic to try and simplify.

 

Hopefully this time around the end products will be equally good in all markets. In a sense maybe the bad global economic situation will benefit Ford, as all divisions are in the same boat so to speak, plus senior people within the product development organization have in the past worked together on cross-brand, cross-market programs.

Another factor that should help:

 

Centralized decision making. Ford's European European engineers won't be permitted to 'assume' that what's fine for Europe is outstanding for the US, and dictate decisions accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

making the same "part"

 

Kind of depends on what you mean by 'part' as well....

 

Aren't there more than 10,000 -parts- to a car? And that probably treats such assembled components as the radio and PCM as a single 'part'...

 

Even if Tier 1 level 'parts' are made in more than one place, that doesn't mean that those 'parts' aren't made out of 'parts' that only come from one source....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another factor that should help:

 

Centralized decision making. Ford's European European engineers won't be permitted to 'assume' that what's fine for Europe is outstanding for the US, and dictate decisions accordingly.

AND vice versa?.........doubt a King Ranch Fiesta would go down well in Europe...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A King Ranch Fiesta. Wonder what that would look like? Bet it would sell well is South Africa.

Probably not, but, they make a small FWD pickup that a KR moniker might just do quite nicely.

Then again, there's the Falcon Ute. Seems exported from Oz to SA.

Check out the SA site

http://www.ford.com.au/servlet/ContentServ...A&c=DFYPage

Do you think Americans would buy it? How about as an F-100?

 

ford-fg-falcon-ute-2008-4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Paul Mascarenas , Vice President, Engineering, Global Product Development is the head man as far as engineering, whom the global engineering team report to?

Also he will be the one responsible to implement the global engineering system?

 

The more I read on this One Ford system, and compare it to Ford 2000, it appears much more organized and better structured. Looks like a good team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Paul Mascarenas , Vice President, Engineering, Global Product Development is the head man as far as engineering, whom the global engineering team report to?

Also he will be the one responsible to implement the global engineering system?

 

The more I read on this One Ford system, and compare it to Ford 2000, it appears much more organized and better structured. Looks like a good team.

certainly hope so...rather than one upmanship a collaboration to make the best possible overall product and utilize each and EVERYONES expertise means a great future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with Ford 2000 is that it did nothing to remove regional silos. Shared products developed under Ford 2000 were always 'headed' by a particular region---which means that the final product depended on how well that region was operating.

 

In the case of CDW27, FoE plainly was neither interested in what European customers wanted, nor in what NA engineers said that NA customers wanted. Had FoE listened to -either- set of constituents the Mondeo/Contour/Mystique would've been oh so much better.

 

But those were the bad ol' days at FoE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with Ford 2000 is that it did nothing to remove regional silos. Shared products developed under Ford 2000 were always 'headed' by a particular region---which means that the final product depended on how well that region was operating.

 

In the case of CDW27, FoE plainly was neither interested in what European customers wanted, nor in what NA engineers said that NA customers wanted. Had FoE listened to -either- set of constituents the Mondeo/Contour/Mystique would've been oh so much better.

 

But those were the bad ol' days at FoE.

 

Interesting words from John Fleming and his thoughts on Ford 2000 comparing to One Ford.

 

Fleming - who had just been put in charge of seven U.S. plants - arrived in North America in 1995, in time to land on the Ford 2000 transition team. And that gave him an up-close look at the collapse of the plan that was supposed to make Ford the world's most profitable automaker.

 

"We drove quickly to be global and to operate globally," said Liverpool-born Fleming, 56, who had started at Ford as a 16-year-old apprentice working on the launch of the Ford Escort in 1967. "But we forgot that you still need geographically regional business groups to worry every day about product, profit and loss, and all the things that we're responsible for."

 

Under Ford 2000, Ford of Europe had little control over important product decisions in its own market. That miscalculation doomed the plan, and the company was forced to shut plants and lay off workers.

 

Current CEO Alan Mulally says he remembers that lesson as he reorganizes the automaker under his One Ford strategy, which shares Trotman's goal of maximizing global product resources.

 

"What I did was use the best of Ford 2000, but also the best of the customer-facing market organizations, the P&Ls," Mulally says.

 

In Fleming's eyes, the initiative doesn't take Ford full circle to the Ford 2000 days.

 

Instead, Mulally's structure will let regional business units save money on vehicle development while introducing cars customized for local markets.

 

Says Fleming: "We're getting the advantage of global scale and still maintaining the people who are worried about the business every day. And that's a different twist from Ford 2000."

 

Amy Wilson

Automotive News

April 30, 2007 -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FYI....Capt Picard never gave the "Make it so..." order to Engineer Scott, they did meet in Star Trek: TNG episode "Relics" (episode #130)....but that was about it.

 

 

Well... he could have said it.. maybe in another alternative world. or if the show had never really been cancelled. but he could have...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably not, but, they make a small FWD pickup that a KR moniker might just do quite nicely.

Then again, there's the Falcon Ute. Seems exported from Oz to SA.

Check out the SA site

http://www.ford.com.au/servlet/ContentServ...A&c=DFYPage

Do you think Americans would buy it? How about as an F-100?

 

ford-fg-falcon-ute-2008-4.jpg

 

The F-150 is a better truck and I bet it is cheaper to build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...