Jump to content

The Ford Order Tracking System Is No Longer Available.  THANKS Cyberdman For Making Available All Of These Past Years.  More Here.

Sign in to follow this  
Decker

Interesting Parts Slipping Out

Recommended Posts

Over the last few weeks there seems to be some interesting info just slipping out on the rona field of play. The numbers game is giving way to or finding some resistance by those interested in the total`s given over the last 18 months. Rona numbers, game players are re spinning some of their accounts in the last 18 months. This rewordings (slightly) by the rona numbers gang are starting to open up a box of questionable stated total`s and category's or labeling of rona patients.   

 

It has been stated on so many releases in the mainstream media by experts that as if these totals were coming from a burning bush. 800K plus Died, NYC Epicenter of Death, and so much in the way of other fear being passed along that most just figure that being labeled as a case was... the kiss of death.

 

Well, then comes the word game or spinners if you like, "Cases" umm maybe that wasn`t the best choice of word? "Incidental" umm just heard that word a few days ago, what's that about?  Then... the spinners go from their kiss of death totals spin to, umm "maybe there`s some over counting going on?" Whaaaat maybe that has something to do with the word spin? Remember the questions asked way back when the profit seekers started the rona game? Those morbid, uncaring and terrible questions about dying "with" or "because". 

 

Anyway, I`ve been conned on occasion, so that is why I am a questioning soul. I think we will see more of the interesting word games being played soon. I could go on about the word game gangs use of the word "test" but, I`ll let this interesting site (most likely already labeled as completely goofy info by numbers game gang) that goes into all forms of the gang's totals and word games and gives some interesting info, facts and data.

 

COVID CHRONICLES (2021) (vimeo.com)

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2022/01/10/cdc-director-finally-admits-major-factor-behind-people-dying-from-wuhan-coronavirus-n2601633

 

***Original post***
After years of government lockdowns, restrictions, school closures and mandates controlling the lives of the American people, Centers for Disease Control Director Rochelle Walensky is finally admitting what we already knew to be true. 
"The overwhelming number of deaths, over 75 percent, occurred in people who had at least four comorbidities. So really, these were people who were unwell to begin with," Walensky told "Good Morning America" Friday. 
"At least four comorbidities." 
"In other words, generally healthy people are not at high risk of dying from the disease. We've known this since summer 2020, and yet, healthy people have been forced to quarantine and work remotely, or not at all, since the pandemic started." 
"CDC director says over 75% of covid deaths were people with “at least four comorbidities” and were “unwell to begin with”
pic.twitter.com/Oq6Oh2qk90
— Lucas Tomlinson (@LucasFoxNews) January 10, 2022
Further, during an interview with "Fox News Sunday," Walensky exposed the data on deaths from Wuhan coronavirus vs. with the disease is mixed together and therefore, completely contaminated. Regardless, the bad data has been used by government officials to justify shutting down schools, regulating private businesses and violating individual medical sovereignty with vaccine mandates. 

 

It is slipping out....

 

"The damage control is in place this morning with the "clarification" of the true meaning to all the "comorbidity" discussion on yesterday's discussion." 

Hmm

Edited by Decker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE: US Military Report States COVID-19 Was Created by a US-Funded EcoHealth Alliance Program at Wuhan Institute of Virology – RedState

 

Hmmm Interesting   

"On Monday night 10 Jan. Project Veritas released a new report announcing that they’d obtained US military documents proving that Dr. Anthony Fauci had lied to Congress and, more specifically, “never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.”

 

"One document, an August 13, 2021 report on Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) letterhead from the Commandant of the Marine Corps Fellow, DARPA to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense carries the subject line: “SARS CoV-2 Origins Investigation With US Government Program Undisclosed Document Analysis.” The analysis reports that the 2018 EcoHealth Alliance coronavirus research proposal that DARPA rejected because it was too risky and likely violated the gain of function research ban was then funded by NIH/NIAID and carried out, and that SARS-CoV-2 – a/k/a COVID-19 – resulted from that research and escaped in August 2019."

 

Kinda put`s some of Rand Paul`s Senate questioning in a new focus.  
 

Edited by Decker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, road turtle said:

Nothing will come of it.


It never does 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fmccap said:

I hope you scrolled down to read the part about where the author is a doctor, but not a medical specialist.  She holds a PhD in electrical engineering and computer science.  Conclusion shopping will always garner what you are looking for, not necessarily what is the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, RedHoncho01 said:

I hope you scrolled down to read the part about where the author is a doctor, but not a medical specialist.  She holds a PhD in electrical engineering and computer science.  Conclusion shopping will always garner what you are looking for, not necessarily what is the truth.

you mean like flip flop lying fauci?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, RedHoncho01 said:

I hope you scrolled down to read the part about where the author is a doctor, but not a medical specialist.  She holds a PhD in electrical engineering and computer science.  Conclusion shopping will always garner what you are looking for, not necessarily what is the truth.

 

Agreed with the shopping reference, completely. As for educational background there leaves little to question other than the medical field you pointed out. If you look at the subject matter within the column it never stated any medical refences that aren`t in a vane of using the educational backgrounds posted by the writer. 

 

At times different highly educated people cross fields of discipline in what is known as a scientific cross referencing partnering studies. This gives the basis of fact checking and counter views from the different disciplines. 

 

Using analytical investigation crosses many fields of discipline. Basing statements of investigation that reference know facts doesn`t have to be in one`s only fields of education. 

 

There are a few terms that have been slowly moved out of our society that are brought to mind, thought provoking statements and food for thought. In some shopper's minds let their eyes read the authors article and find those two terms.   

Edited by Decker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Decker said:

AP instructs editors: Start downplaying case counts in our stories about COVID – HotAir

 

I`m a shopper, of food for thought. The real reasonings behind some plans are slipping out. 

Of course, there is also the quality of the reporting source.  Epoch Times is notorious for making outlandish and abjectly false reports.

 

I had never heard of Hot Air until you posted this.  It is owned by Salem Communications and is dedicated to posting about the Biden administration but not necessarily truthfully.

 

Being a scientist, I rely on peer reviewed scientific journals, not schlocky tabloids.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RedHoncho01 said:

Being a scientist, I rely on peer reviewed scientific journals, not schlocky tabloids.

Be careful of peer reviewed scientific journals.

 

Dr Martenson (researcher, not MD) way back when the whole covid thing started, paid close attention to peer reviewed docs and the writers.  On one particular issue, he found 1/2 dozen peer reviewed articles.  He started seeing a pattern of the same group all peer reviewing each others articles, including being authors on the original "research".  Essentially they were working in the same echo chamber together.  Some of these articles were in main stream med journals, and several were withdrawn by the journals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RedHoncho01 said:

Of course, there is also the quality of the reporting source.  Epoch Times is notorious for making outlandish and abjectly false reports.

 

I had never heard of Hot Air until you posted this.  It is owned by Salem Communications and is dedicated to posting about the Biden administration but not necessarily truthfully.

 

Being a scientist, I rely on peer reviewed scientific journals, not schlocky tabloids.

 

Being just a long-term laborer, I tend to focus of course on the daily decisions that affect not only myself but also those others around me trying to accomplish the similar life achievements. With the educational document from that little corn field school in Indiana I`ve pick up some bad habits. Over the years life experiences show one view and sitting in a classroom show another of the trip we all take on our journey's. Unfortunately, for me I kinda walked my journey somewhat backwards from most. With education I went through the typical lower-level learning as everyone but, had the opportunities to receive training in the real world, as some may call it before the next level of classroom experiences. 

 

This first training was unfamiliar to me at first but soon became realized to be a life experience in education systems, techniques and methods of controlling one's decision making. Basic intelligence gathering, recording and documenting at first. Then the training in filtering. This second step, filtering would lend a bit of a curve ball in my next steps in my journey. When time came, I went to (always part time because of my decisions) to see about expanding (possibly) my abilities in life. So, Boiler Up. It became apparent that the decision making was present on all types of issues, personal and intellectual. On the intellectual level it was kinda different from what I had just been through on that other path. While Boilering Up I became aware, fast, that the factors, ingrediencies given for decisions were given with boundaries. No problem, I listened and proceeded to well go along. Those Prof`s that had instructions in different disciplines with the society or public affairs were very, opinionated at least.  Those Prof`s tended to put forth in my eyes loaded or pretty much weighted material to... stir the body to their decisions that, were already prepared as what is factual and/or correct. So of course, the student body was then made to ..... think as they were instructed. Not instructed as a fundamental outline of education, as in a deductive reasoning manner of education. 

 

This was a contrasting level of awareness I found on this type or manner of applying educational techniques. From hours of reading documents to listening to past and present communications to then move into a decision-making plan, to then moving towards reasons given by an instructor that was posted, agued and instructed as factors to base any decision the body should or could make, to pass the Prof`s course. This was the beginning of my furthering education. Am I an unhappy Boiler Maker in no way. Am I glad to have had training that allowed me to see the other curb running alongside my path, without any doubt. 

 

Now don`t get me wrong RedHonco (scientist) I believe in your rights fully when it comes to your views of the journey you`ve laid claim too. But over the years (way too many to recount or want too) in these old eyes there`s a few things that are not doing the best in the results column. Perception presented by some with some form of an ulterior motive, products that gain profit and those that believe in opinions over the factual balance of deductive reasoning of presented facts. 

 

I only differ from your points made by understanding my chooses in the type of ways I understand the information, that we all on a daily basis are currently bombarded with. The motives either ulterior or not, profit based benefits or not, opinionated or not get all jumbled together, this is from one slightly educated, life experienced trained member of this free society to a scientist and just my take and not judgmental in anyway, I have the bad habit to take in all the road signs along our journey, then try to make the best decision for myself, of course trying to make the right "decision" to best reach my sought-after conclusions for the best results.  Is thinking for oneself, making the best intended decisions and seeing opinions as just the first steps towards understanding... is this really becoming the parts of our path in this land founded on the freedom of free thought.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, road turtle said:

Be careful of peer reviewed scientific journals.

 

Dr Martenson (researcher, not MD) way back when the whole covid thing started, paid close attention to peer reviewed docs and the writers.  On one particular issue, he found 1/2 dozen peer reviewed articles.  He started seeing a pattern of the same group all peer reviewing each others articles, including being authors on the original "research".  Essentially they were working in the same echo chamber together.  Some of these articles were in main stream med journals, and several were withdrawn by the journals.

I read everything with a grain of salt.  Science isn't perfect and some articles were published without being properly peer reviewed.  One study I recall came from the Henry Ford Medical Center regarding treatment of COVID with Ivermectin.  It was supposedly peer reviewed but when looking at the citations at the bottom of the article the reviewers also worked for Henry Ford Medical Center.  Most people in the scientific community would view this as very suspect and eventually the article was withdrawn from the journal it was published in due to this fact.  A peer review is properly conducted when the reviewers have no connection to the study whatsoever so they can view it without prejudice.

 

There are many sources of media available.  Almost all of them are profit driven.  Some have ulterior motives as well.  Some will use video that is highly edited that presents something that is completely out of context to the original; others will go the extremes of deep faking the audio to to flip the script as it were.   Most of them are funded by the far right but some are also funded by the far left.  Those of us in the middle get stuck having the radicals from both ends of the spectrum making the most noise and getting the most attention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NIH Reveals Wuhan Lab Partner EcoHealth Alliance Committed More Grant Violations
By Zachary Stieber January 13, 2022 Updated: January 13, 2022

 

The nonprofit that funneled United States grant money to a high-level laboratory in China committed a slew of violations, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) revealed this week.

 

(EPOCH TIMES)
 

 

Edited by Decker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, RedHoncho01 said:

 

 

Being a scientist, I rely on peer reviewed scientific journals, not schlocky tabloids.

 

 

They were just a tad off on HIV / AIDS.....

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With most situations things slip out that are at times not obvious, at some point in the ongoing situation. But, in time will slip through the press (AP) that of course the media then plays as in most slips, toward the obvious. Again But... in a lowkey way move to the reasons for the obvious in a fashionable finger pointing article.  

 

“People are feeling like they’re getting less than they bargained for when they put their co leaders of the free world in office. There’s a lot of emotions, and none of them are good," said Quentin Wathum-Ocama, president of the Young Democrats of America. “I don’t know if the right word is ‘apoplectic’ or ‘demoralized.’ We’re down. We’re not seeing the results.”

 

Sometimes when the portrayed picture of paradise comes into focus after the obvious is realized and those that believed in their leaders slightly different view of the promised paradise see... the obvious as an after effect. For those that looked closer at the promises, predictions and read all the great story lines through the last 12 plus months it has become just another ground hog day. The slipping out most likely will continue. 

Edited by Decker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/14/2022 at 5:10 AM, cal50 said:

 

 

They were just a tad off on HIV / AIDS.....

 

 

Perhaps because we had a President who was both senile and homophobic.  Reagan ignored the AIDS crisis for years.  Even when he did finally pay attention is was too little too late.

 

The good thing about science is we don't know everything about everything, especially new things like AIDS then or COVID now.  We learn as we go.  Once we know better we do better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another sign along one of the curbs that I just past on this journey, I became aware of what may give a little directional flow for the other travelers in their hyper fear type of journey. Those passing lanes are so filled with fear and dangerous when travelers only listen to those that profess to know the only way and insist, they are the science. 

 

But for sure I believe in the sciences, all. (period) With some of the road signs I and many travelers have passed in the last !8 plus months have been like the fore telling of the second coming (in my discipline first) a few scientists (disciples) have stepped out from mortal humanity to raise to a level of a scientist form a heavenly status. With a specific scientist putting forth a form of gospel in a backlite manner to address the followers from near a burning bush. 

 

But Hey on a lower level the shit is still sneakin out ....

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/stacey-lennox/2022/01/15/two-omicron-studies-are-fantastic-news-that-should-end-mandates-and-restrictions-n1549676

 

Yep....schlocky tabloid.

Edited by Decker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good read for the road. JMO of course

 

https://unherd.com/2022/01/how-our-universities-became-sheep-factories/

 

Arif Ahmed
Arif Ahmed is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Cambridge, Fellow of Gonville and Caius College, and a campaigner for free speech. 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some pure underground Art.....

 

image.thumb.png.90c55f8642b7b136dc6757406a3a3522.png

 

Street Art is in itself a pure form of realism. Praying to read the word from the church of all that is of pure light through written word by the all-knowing all-seeing lord of the science. 

 

image.thumb.png.1a7512fd2d33700140ad77c802d45f15.png

 

"It is the first time in all medical history that a less than effectiveness of a medicine is being blamed on those who.... chose not to take the medicine." 

 

 

Edited by Decker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"That raise meant nothing": Inflation's "unexpected" reality dawns at WaPo – HotAir

 

Giving away any hourly rate increases.... 

 

schlocky tabloid ummm I guess but, numbers are numbers. $35 to fill my Focus that was $20 or $22 just a year ago. 

Edited by Decker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Figures don't lie. Inflation supposedly 7%. Medicare premium up 14.5%. Natural Gas up 30%. Groceries and Gasoline, too afraid to calculate. Social Security payment up 5.9%, Ford Pension (salary) 0%. Priceless... At least I got a pension!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×