Jump to content

fuzzymoomoo

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    16,297

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    392

 Content Type 

Everything posted by fuzzymoomoo

  1. fuzzymoomoo
    The what?
  2. fuzzymoomoo
    I don’t want to say any more beyond I’ve heard rumors. The only reason I mentioned the flat rock thing to begin with was because it’s publicly available information that was shared in the 2023 UAW agreement. If/when the company is ready to announce something I’ll comment further.
  3. fuzzymoomoo
    I’ve heard some rumors, but I’ll leave it at that because there’s nothing concrete.
  4. fuzzymoomoo
    if you’re shopping 100% on budget like a ton of people do, you’re not paying attention to that
  5. fuzzymoomoo
    If you’re shopping purely on budget, when you can get a lease on a Ranger for the same monthly payment as a better equipped F-150, why would you choose a Ranger? I’m willing to bet most people would choose the F-150.
  6. fuzzymoomoo
    My flex is just as bad. I have terrible luck with windshields. Every vehicle I’ve ever owned has needed a replacement at one point or another. Best decision I ever made was adding window coverage to my insurance. Only costs me a $100 deductible and most places around here will pay that so it ends up being nothing out of pocket for me.
  7. fuzzymoomoo
    Yeah I’m aware of what the specs are, but seeing is believing. I’ve sat in both and there is a difference even though the physical dimensions say otherwise.
  8. fuzzymoomoo
    This isn’t entirely accurate. They basically modified the Ranger cab to fit on the Bronco underbody, which resulted in better legroom for rear seat passengers. also, not a refresh. Completely different program number.
  9. fuzzymoomoo
    It was never happening to begin with. I hate how that stupid clickbait website got that much attention for that.
  10. fuzzymoomoo
  11. fuzzymoomoo
    That would be a HUGE investment into MAP. The body shop would probably have to expand.
  12. fuzzymoomoo
    Sounds like another fancy electronic gizmo that doesn’t add anything except yet another thing that can fail to me.
  13. fuzzymoomoo
    Yeah but Ford already did that 5 years ago. GM is kind of in the process of starting that now.
  14. fuzzymoomoo
    The Chinese government has no fucks to give, they have no problem with subsidizing their entire industry if they have to. Works well for their propaganda machine.
  15. fuzzymoomoo
    That front end is.. a decision
  16. fuzzymoomoo
    Im at the point where the less technological gizmos, the better. Give me Sync 3/4, a decent variety of information in the instrument cluster and power windows/seats and I’m good with that. Unfortunately for me nobody will build what I want without waiting ungodly amounts of time for them to get around to scheduling it, if it even gets built in the first place.
  17. fuzzymoomoo
    EcoSport was imported from India
  18. fuzzymoomoo
    You’re thinking of Hermosillo where Maverick is already being built. Cuactitlan builds Mach-E.
  19. fuzzymoomoo
    I think they bought one of the presses to test out at some R&D facility in Dearborn but no Ford stamping facility currently has one in operation and AFAIK there aren’t currently any plans to have any installed.
  20. fuzzymoomoo
    bullshit
  21. fuzzymoomoo
    Because your UAW overlords demand it of you
  22. fuzzymoomoo
    Because you’re like me and are unnecessarily anal about how your music is organized.
  23. fuzzymoomoo
    I saw an interesting mini-doc about that. That all started when Boeing merged with McDonnell-Douglas. The two cultures clashed completely and because the executives at McDonnell ended up with more control over the board their corporate culture ended up weeding out the Boeing culture.
  24. fuzzymoomoo
    Hard to disagree with any of it
  25. fuzzymoomoo
    Exactly this.
×
×
  • Create New...