T-dubz

This makes no sense. You already have a vehicle that slots in below the kuga and above the puma with a boxy design and the bronco name. It’s called the bronco sport! Why not just use that?

Got an email from Ford for 25% off Ford accessories for cyber Monday. Use code DEAL2025

I also think manufacturers have a hard time offering a cool, sporty looking designs at an affordable price. Not because it costs them more, but because they think they can sell it for more. The xiaomi su7 has one of the lowest drags in a production vehicle and starts at roughly $30k in US dollars in China. I doubt an automaker would sell something like this for less than twice that price here.

I like the idea of this, but not the execution. the front bumper is weird looking. The price is crazy. Interior looks good though. For $70k, all the windows should roll down instead of having to remove them.

Europeans prefer small cars, have more expensive gas, have better public transportation and everything is closer. The average European drives 6500 miles a year vs 13,500 for Americans. Europe is literally the perfect environment for EVs.

That’s why I was thinking it could be a street legal version of the Le Mans hyper car. Otherwise it seems like a lot of money to be investing into two separate high end sports cars when ford surely has other more important things to be concerned about.

Maybe it’s a street legal version of that? I can’t see it being any variant of a mustang, 4 door or otherwise. It could be a completely new GT, but I don’t see ford developing both the hyper car and a new GT at the same time.

Side and rear look great. The front is the low point for me. It’s not bad, but I think they could have done a better job. Interior looks good but it’s the same as all Kia interiors.

I personally don’t care about any of that stuff. I’d rather them hire a few more techs so that it doesn’t take 2.5 hrs for an oil change every time I go in.

No one said it wasn’t. People are much more likely to purchase something if it comes from the factory instead of a dealer installed option that costs thousands of dollars. If this 300T was an additional trim, it would probably sell pretty well, but I have to believe being a custom garage item will limit its popularity.

I wonder how many of these custom garage packages are actually sold. I see this and think it’s cool, then see it’s from the custom garage and instantly lose interest. Sign me up if it’s from the factory though.

Bout time for the free wheelin. I still can’t believe it stuck around on the Bronco for another year. Heritage needs to go next for the Bronco sport.

I think we can know. Colorado and ranger don’t even offer a longer option. Frontier and Tacoma do, but I’d guess their sales are so low that no one would even notice. The most popular f150 comes with the shortest bed. Now with that said, long bed trucks look ridiculous IMO and they can be harder to maneuver. This mid gate solves those problems so that’s a plus. However, I think ford should keep these new EVs as simple as possible for a few reasons: 1. Lower price will attract more customers 2. Ford has a problem with quality and recalls so the less places for failure, the better. 3. If these EVs are being built on some new assembly line, then I would think you’d want to make it as simple as possible to ensure everything runs smoothly.

It sounds cool, but as the Maverick has shown, the bed size doesn’t really seem to matter. People who buy small trucks aren’t buying them to move big things. If you are trying to build an affordable EV, there’s no need to have features like this that increase cost when the customers would have been perfectly happy without it. There’s probably a reason GM is the only brand that offers midgates (that I know of).

I like it. Let’s not forget that Toyota took the Prius and made it a good looking sedan too. If you squint a bit, the Corolla looks a bit like the Prius but with sharper edges.