BlackHorse Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 There have been bombings there everyday since black powder was discovered. People are nuts. But yes, we won. Removed a dictator, displaced his army, built another, and are helping rebuild the country. They don't want us there?.. Really?... Have you asked them, because I have. Those people were so happy to see us they were literally crying and hugging us. Get a clue before you open your mouth. He doesn't want a clue. He wants to be a socialist. That's why I didn't bother responding to his little crybaby tort earlier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefstang Posted November 4, 2008 Share Posted November 4, 2008 uh, then why do they throw bombs at you? why do they hoard their own money instead of using it for the war effort? why should i shut my mouth because YOU say so, bucky boy? more brain washing, and you're the proud recipient. be proud. Yeah, you're right. You probibly know more about what it's like over there. After all you watch the news, and they never put a slant on anything. I was brainwashed by my own fucking eyes. Good thing we have "experts" like you shootin' shit outta your mouth, or we might all get brainwashed by the facts. Do you have any idea who's throwing those bombs at our boys? Either use your whole brain, or shut it down the rest of the way. But don't tell me how it is over there, 'cause you're an ignorant ass. Annnd... I bash you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_spaniard Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 (edited) Double Post Combo! <deleted> Edited November 5, 2008 by the_spaniard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_spaniard Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Great to see another political thread degenerate, even a light-hearted one. If people want to act like children, they should be ignored as such. Bored gets an iggy. Chief gets an iggy. And yeah, STP falls on the hippy side of the fence more often than not (and I don't care for hippies), but does anyone deserve those kinds of attacks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
napfirst Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Great to see another political thread degenerate, even a light-hearted one. If people want to act like children, they should be ignored as such. Bored gets an iggy. Naps gets an iggy. And yeah, STP falls on the hippy side of the fence more often than not (and I don't care for hippies), but does anyone deserve those kinds of attacks? No sure what you are talking about, until now I have not posted on this thread....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefstang Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Great to see another political thread degenerate, even a light-hearted one. If people want to act like children, they should be ignored as such. Bored gets an iggy. Chief gets an iggy. And yeah, STP falls on the hippy side of the fence more often than not (and I don't care for hippies), but does anyone deserve those kinds of attacks? Dirty, dirty hippies... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_spaniard Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 No sure what you are talking about, until now I have not posted on this thread....... Sorry Naps, your good, I meant Chiefs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefstang Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Sorry Naps, your good, I meant Chiefs. Sooo, my bad? Don't see it. Oh well, maybe we can be friends again tomorrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Sooo, my bad? Don't see it. Oh well, maybe we can be friends again tomorrow. Queer. ????? You don't see it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefstang Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 ????? You don't see it? The second one was a complete joke, bub. I've seen far worse.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timmm55 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 The second one was a complete joke, bub. I've seen far worse.... If you say so, bub....hard to tell without emoticons. Hell, I've seen and heard worse....doesn't make it right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford Jellymoulds Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 The BOF Dream Thread! :happy feet: Link to article Meanwhile, Sen. Barack Obama leads among import owners, including Mini (70 percent), With 70% of Classic Mini drivers backing Barack Obama he can't lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerM Posted November 5, 2008 Author Share Posted November 5, 2008 So much for levity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 cliche?? nick, your assertion that the war is won proves that you tow the rights line. the country doesn't even want us there. yep, we won. that's why there are bombings there every day. if that's winning........ :o you can keep your cliche comments to yourself as long as you keep making them yourself. it makes you sound like a hypocrite. Keep the cliches coming. Chiefstang pretty much summed up my end of the argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford Jellymoulds Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Keep the cliches coming. Chiefstang pretty much summed up my end of the argument. Who did you vote for then Nick just interested? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 (edited) Who did you vote for then Nick just interested? McCain. I have no problems admitting it. Not that my vote meant anything anyway. My state hasn't voted Republican in 24 years. Edited November 5, 2008 by NickF1011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ford Jellymoulds Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 McCain. I have no problems admitting it. Not that my vote meant anything anyway. My state hasn't voted Republican in 24 years. Its a free world l can't see any problems admitting Nick it Obama and McCain were both very good, McCain had the legacy of Bushie to carry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Its a free world l can't see any problems admitting Nick it Obama and McCain were both very good, McCain had the legacy of Bushie to carry. No. Neither of them were very good. In fact, both of them were pretty freaking horrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bored of Pisteon Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 McCain. I have no problems admitting it. Not that my vote meant anything anyway. My state hasn't voted Republican in 24 years. So did I, and my state that I unfortunately still live in hasn't either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bored of Pisteon Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 No. Neither of them were very good. In fact, both of them were pretty freaking horrible. But the opposite of the "lesser of two evils" got elected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickF1011 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 (edited) But the opposite of the "lesser of two evils" got elected. Personally, I really don't think there will be much difference between the two. Neither one of them will enact any kind of reforms that we actually need. The best thing that can happen at this point is Obama having a lackluster first term, where nothing really significant gets done, and people call him out on falling through on all of his promises of "change", and then the Republicans offer up another useless candidate who brings the same tired campaign rhetoric to the campaign trail. It would be the perfect scenario for a solid 3rd party candidate to actually gain some traction when offering up real change. And no, Bob Barr, Ron Paul, and Ralph Nader aren't what I'd call "good" 3rd party candidates. Edited November 5, 2008 by NickF1011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savetheplanet Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Great to see another political thread degenerate, even a light-hearted one. If people want to act like children, they should be ignored as such. Bored gets an iggy. Chief gets an iggy. And yeah, STP falls on the hippy side of the fence more often than not (and I don't care for hippies), but does anyone deserve those kinds of attacks? It's ok, they are just having a little fun, I don't take it too serious. But yeah, I am not the hippie they think I am, it might surprise them that I am pro gun and love to hunt and fish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going_Going_Gone Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 I had to laugh yesterday. One of the TV stations aired a clip of John McCain leaving the underground parking garage of his Phoenix condo building to drive up to his vacation home in Cornville. What was he driving? A Toyota...what else would a politician advertising Country First drive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman100 Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 It might be different up in Northern Ohio, or in Michigan, but around here, all the neighborhoods that are considered "liberal" are also the places you are least likely to see an Big 3 domestic product around. Go to Massachusetts and see what people drive - other than taxis and trucks, seeing a Ford product is a rare sight indeed. My brother-in-law lives in Boston - no one buys domestic there. The UAW has thrown in with the wrong crowd - but then again the "handout" mentality has fully blossomed in this country - both rich and poor have been taken in by the power grab in Washington. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
94bronco Posted November 7, 2008 Share Posted November 7, 2008 Personally, I really don't think there will be much difference between the two. Neither one of them will enact any kind of reforms that we actually need. The best thing that can happen at this point is Obama having a lackluster first term, where nothing really significant gets done, and people call him out on falling through on all of his promises of "change", and then the Republicans offer up another useless candidate who brings the same tired campaign rhetoric to the campaign trail. It would be the perfect scenario for a solid 3rd party candidate to actually gain some traction when offering up real change. And no, Bob Barr, Ron Paul, and Ralph Nader aren't what I'd call "good" 3rd party candidates. I have faith that the Republicans can go back to their roots and get back to being the true reform party, I think Jindal would be perfect with Steele as his running mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.